Sam Sloan wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 23:52:19 GMT, "Gunny Bunny"

wrote:

"Any testimony elicited at trial in which there is reason
to anticipate that
the name of the child victim or any other information
concerning the child
victim may be divulged in that testimony, shall be taken in a closed
courtroom," Granade wrote.

Wait until Judge Granade finds out that there is no child
victim; just
a male adult FBI agent pretending to be a child.

Sam Sloan

Sam,

It does not matter. The courts are full of rejected appeals on tha
basis.

The applicable law that Mr Sherzer is charged under does not require an
underage victim. Although in this case there was a minor involved
initially.

Section 2423(b). Interstate or Foreign Travel with Intent to Engage in a
Sexual Act with a Juvenile

Whoever knowingly travels or conspires to do so in interstate or foreign
commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, with
the intent to engage in any sexual activity with a person under 18 years
of age for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.

================================================== ======================

The law is written so that as long as someone travels or conspires to so
with the intent to engage in sex with underage person is guilty. In
other words, as long as he he/she believes he is dealing with a person
underage , he/she is guilty - even if the other side is a 6" 4' male FBI
agent. I like this law a lot as it is getting a lot of creeps locked
up.

relevant link:

http://csmail.law.pace.edu/lawlib/le...-circuit/test3
/99-1759.html

================================================== ======================

With your known self profess desire to engage in sex with as many people
as you can before you die, you probably should be aware of that little
known law.

--
Posted via http://web2news.com the faster web2news on the web