![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bringing, crossville, lawsuit, move, opinions, stop, thinking, wanted |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On 15 Nov 2004 19:44:28 -0800, (KidDon) wrote: (Sam Sloan) wrote in message ... On 15 Nov 2004 07:31:17 -0800, (KidDon) wrote: Still think so, Sam? It looks like the Judge is leaning the other way: "The attorney should address issues such as standing and the appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of an injunction against an official of another state)." kiddon When I first read the decision, I was discouraged for that reason. However, on reconsideration I feel that I am winning on the big important issues, which is whether sections 510 and 511 apply. If those sections do apply, then the only question would be to get the right sort of plaintiff that the court would have to agree does have standing. My conclusion is that I will be successful in the goal of stopping the move to Crossville. It might turn out that I personally lose my case but nevertheless somebody else such as the Attorney General of New York will jump in and stop the move. Sam Sloan PS Please note that I put you on my mailing list. ____________________ Thank you for putting me on your mailing list, but you can save the snail mail postage, as I had already read the same pleadings, motions and orders on-line via samsloan.com, and check out cases of interest via my PACER account on a fairly regular basis. kiddon Interesting, because I am just finding out about PACER. A law student called me two days ago saying that she found my cases against the Republican Party on PACER. According to her, everything I have filed in court on that case is available on PACER. I am wondering if this is true. Is somebody scanning in all my documents? Sam Sloan _______________________ With regard to the Federal cases, yes, somebody is scanning in all of the documents you file. I'm not sure about the NY State cases. kiddon |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On 15 Nov 2004 19:44:28 -0800, (KidDon) wrote: (Sam Sloan) wrote in message ... On 15 Nov 2004 07:31:17 -0800, (KidDon) wrote: Still think so, Sam? It looks like the Judge is leaning the other way: "The attorney should address issues such as standing and the appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of an injunction against an official of another state)." kiddon When I first read the decision, I was discouraged for that reason. However, on reconsideration I feel that I am winning on the big important issues, which is whether sections 510 and 511 apply. If those sections do apply, then the only question would be to get the right sort of plaintiff that the court would have to agree does have standing. My conclusion is that I will be successful in the goal of stopping the move to Crossville. It might turn out that I personally lose my case but nevertheless somebody else such as the Attorney General of New York will jump in and stop the move. Sam Sloan PS Please note that I put you on my mailing list. ____________________ Thank you for putting me on your mailing list, but you can save the snail mail postage, as I had already read the same pleadings, motions and orders on-line via samsloan.com, and check out cases of interest via my PACER account on a fairly regular basis. kiddon Interesting, because I am just finding out about PACER. A law student called me two days ago saying that she found my cases against the Republican Party on PACER. According to her, everything I have filed in court on that case is available on PACER. I am wondering if this is true. Is somebody scanning in all my documents? Sam Sloan No, all the court documents are being scanned, not just yours. I work in a government office, and all the attorneys and paralegals use PACER. David Ames |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Sam Sloan) wrote in message ...
On 27 Oct 2004 06:17:21 -0700, (KidDon) wrote: Without even getting to issues of liability and available relief, if any; my first question would be whether or not you have standing. I have not and will not research the issue, but I seriously doubt if you would survive a motion to dismiss on grounds of standing. kiddon I am a dues paying member of the USCF. That gives me standing. The board members are guilty of self-dealing. Beatriz wants the move to Crossville so that she can fire Bill Goichberg and take his job. The last ED was paid more than $100,000 per year. The stated qualifications for Executive Director are in the November issue of Chess Life. I wonder if Beatriz Marinello meets those requirements, such as an advanced degree. Since Sam Sloan alleges that she is unqualified, it would be interesting to have her depose and say whether or not she is qualified as stated in Chess Life. David Ames |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Centre Game Results! | Ken Lovering | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 3 | April 11th 06 08:20 AM |
| Report on the Crossville, Tennessee MOVE by Andrew Zito | the Pushed Pawn | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | October 6th 05 01:03 AM |
| Report on the Crossville, Tennessee MOVE by Andrew Zito | the Pushed Pawn | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 1 | October 6th 05 01:03 AM |
| USCF VOTE TO MOVE TO CROSSVILLE BY March 31, 2005 | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 2 | October 19th 04 01:47 AM |