StanB wrote:

"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
ups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,
can be an excellent writer. He could easily mask his usual style. Sam also
likes to crosspost mucho rubbish just to whip up activity here. But he's not
the only one doing it.

Total effin bs from stan the immaculate man. Getta life dead**** & pls.
turn off the gruesome rgcp crap. thks. yrs' for ever 'arsehole' -
****ing arsehole..

Sam Sloan wrote:

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:10:09 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
oups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,




snip

This insipid NY turkette has a mind? Pls. he's a nobody, a hack, his
daughter will no doubt outdo W. Allen in comedy, like when daddy Sam
went into the creche on 406 st. & asked 'em about their insurance
policy, & really spoiled their day? - hilarious stuff. Yeah, really
funny, whadda'n effin tosser - & you effin yank, creepy, ****s lap it up
like elixir. Give me a break you creeps!..




snip..

"michael adams" wrote in message
...

Total effin bs from stan the immaculate man. Getta life dead**** & pls.
turn off the gruesome rgcp crap. thks. yrs' for ever 'arsehole' -
****ing arsehole..

Same to you fellow.

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:33:01 GMT, (Sam Sloan)
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:10:09 -0500, "StanB"
wrote:


"Bruce Leverett" wrote in message
roups.com...

Your use of "Charlie" here reminded me of something that I would have
forgotten, which is that "Frank Dreck" seems a lot like a pseudonym.
"Frank Dreck" came into existence since the lawsuit, and "Frank Dreck"
posts messages only about the lawsuit, and only to take Sam's side, but
usually saying things that Sam would rather not have over his own
signature. So perhaps "Frank Dreck" is Sam.

It has occurred to me lately that Sam may very well be behind so many of the
anonymous posters that come and go here. Sam, when he puts his mind to it,
can be an excellent writer. He could easily mask his usual style. Sam also
likes to crosspost mucho rubbish just to whip up activity here. But he's not
the only one doing it.

However, it is not my style. My preference is to be the only one right
when everyone else is wrong.

Therefore, I would never create an anonymous poster who agrees with
me. In contrast, Kevin Bachler and Bruce Draney feel a need to have
someone in the group agree with them, so when they feel outnumbered
they go out and create a fake personality. I never do that.

I was just researching the Bible to find out an example of this.
Repent sinners and read your Bible. There is a story in the Old
Testament that goes something like this:

They brought 30 great and wise men and they all said that A was true,
but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 60 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 100 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

In the end it comes out that the prophet was right and all those other
190 were wrong.

Can anybody find the name of this prophet because I am just looking
and I cannot remember it? It might have been the same one who was told
by God to lie.

Sam Sloan

I need to add that while I would never create an anonymous poster who
agrees with me, I might consider creating an anonymous poster who
disagrees with me. When I receive a letter from someone who strongly
disagrees with me, I often post it here.

Fortunately, there is no shortage of people who disagree with me, so I
do not need to create fake personalities who do so.

Sam Sloan

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...

I need to add that while I would never create an anonymous poster who
agrees with me, I might consider creating an anonymous poster who
disagrees with me. When I receive a letter from someone who strongly
disagrees with me, I often post it here.

Hmmmnnnn.

ok,?

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 Sam Sloan wrote:

However, it is not my style. My preference is to be the only one right
when everyone else is wrong.

Therefore, I would never create an anonymous poster who agrees with
me. In contrast, Kevin Bachler and Bruce Draney feel a need to have
someone in the group agree with them, so when they feel outnumbered
they go out and create a fake personality. I never do that.

I was just researching the Bible to find out an example of this.
Repent sinners and read your Bible. There is a story in the Old
Testament that goes something like this:

They brought 30 great and wise men and they all said that A was true,
but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 60 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

Then they brought 100 great and wise men and they all said that A was
true, but this prophet said, no A is false and B is true.

In the end it comes out that the prophet was right and all those other
190 were wrong.

Can anybody find the name of this prophet because I am just looking
and I cannot remember it? It might have been the same one who was told
by God to lie.

Sam Sloan

I have found the passage in the Bible I had in mind. It is in 1 Kings
22.

In this passage, the King of Israel is thinking of going to battle
against the King of Syria. Therefore, he calls 400 prophets and asks
them who will win the battle.

All 400 prophets tell himthat he will win the battle.

As the King of Israel is preparing for the battle, the King of Judea
recommends that he call just one more prophet.

With great reluctance,the King of Israel calls that one more prophet.

That prophet,whose name is Micaiah, is called.

Micaiah tells the King of Israel the same thing, which is that he will
be victorious.

The King of Israel says to Micaiah,"OK. Now, tell me what you really
see."

Micaiah replies,"Well actually I forsee that you will be defeated and
your army will be scattered."

The King of Israel gets very angry and orders Micaiah to be sent to
prison.

The King of Israel goes into battle and, just as the Prophet Micaiah
has forseen, the Army of Israel is defeated and the King of Israel is
killed.

So, the 400 prophets were wrong and the one prophet Micaiah was right.

The moral and application to this story is obvious.

Sam Sloan