![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: again, board, executive, george, john, running, uscf |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:24:53 GMT, "George John"
wrote: "The Masked Bishop" wrote in message om... Dear TMB, Gee, everyone says that. You are right, words are cheap. Actions are what counts. I think my past actions support my words that have been an independent. One wonders how such a past and present collection of leaders with such high integrity have managed to screw things up so much. Integrity is important, but it's not sufficient by itself. The basic keys to any business success is understand your market and customer, have something to sell they want, adequately advertise what you have, and service it well. IMO, the USCF has done none of this anywhere as well as I think it could or should be done. Maybe somebody SHOULD come in with some craven agenda and crush all the opposition. At least something other than finger-pointing would actually happen. Clearly, finger-pointing isn't what we need. But, accountability is important, as well as understanding what went wrong in the past so the same mistakes don't keep being made over and over. The important lesson here is to come up with a reasonable plan and then carry it out to completion. It seems to me too often in the past USCF leadership comes up with plan A, only to have the next wave of leadership decide that plan B is better. Plan A is dropped before it is completed and any money and time spent on Plan A is wasted. Then Plan B gets dropped for C, and so on. Nothing gets done. Back to the idea of integrity for a moment, it is important for the USCF to do the right thing whenever reasonably possible beyond the minimum required by law, the Bylaws, BOD motions, etc. An example might be the move to Crossville. Based on the limited reading I have done on the subject, it seems that USCF leadership made a commitment to Crossville that it would move there. While moving there may not be the best plan, it seems to be considered by many a reasonable plan (assuming the move is managed competently). Therefore, even if a better deal were to come along, the USCF should do the right thing and stick with its original plan (and commitment) to move to Crossville should they still want us. Best regards, George George John is Running for USCF Executive Board Again!! The above is his opening campaign statement. Sounds good, does it not. However, George John comes with some baggage: He engineered the two biggest mistakes the USCF ever made, namely the firing of Executive Director Mike Cavallo and the introduction of US Chess Live. These acts with the full participation and involvement of George John caused the USCF to lose ONE MILLION DOLLARS. If he wants to run again he had better find a way to explain away this. In addition, he claims to be a computer expert but his actual job was working in a used furniture store. He had better explain this. Those with good memories will recall that George John was a full-fledged member of the Redman Gang which came close to destroying the USCF. Now, George John is returning as a member of the Beatriz Marinello Gang, which is determined to succeed in destroying the USCF where the Redman Gang had failed. Once again above, George John issues the same trite and meaningless platitudes which are so characteristic of his every campaign, but when it comes to actual action, George John has been on the wrong side of every issue. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| $am $loan for USCF Executive Board | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 12 | May 2nd 06 08:24 PM |
| $am $loan for USCF Executive Board | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 11 | May 2nd 06 08:24 PM |
| The 4 Polgar Proposals: To which did the Executive Board agree? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 0 | February 27th 06 03:48 PM |
| The 4 Polgar Proposals: To which did the Executive Board agree? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | February 27th 06 12:41 AM |
| Reply to Affidavit of Leroy Dubeck | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 26 | March 29th 05 04:44 PM |