![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: fake, numbers, uscf, year |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF
USCF Executive Director Bill Hall writes the following in the USCF BINFOS: "To the USCF Executive Board: "The audit is winding down and we should have a Draft for circulation by Tuesday. The bottom line should show a loss of $53,000. Although you never can be happy with a loss, considering the extra expenditures for Spectrum (and the profit-sharing plan), increased legal expenses, a significant write-off in inventory, and some significant losses on two investments, I believe we did not do too poorly this year." If the loss was really only $53,000 we might agree. By the way, that number includes $13,000 in unnecessary Internet Insurance that Joel Channing insisted that the USCF get to protect HIS assets. However, as Grant Perks explains in a posting to Susan's chessdiscussion group, that number is arrived at after the office ignored the $50,000 cap that the delegates voted to place on imaginary money received from the Life Membership Account. Grant Perks explains, "the office knows the year end adjustment will be made each year and they can spend based on the cap being reversed". The money is called "imaginary money" because the USCF office is supposed to receive $120,000 this year from the Life Membership Assets to service the the 10,000 life members who paid their life membership dues years ago and their funds were supposed to have been placed in a restricted reserve account. However, all of that money was "borrowed" out of that account years ago and in 2003 the account was closed. Therefore, the $120,000 is money the office is supposed to have received but does not actually get. (Usually, the amount is about $100,000, but this year Grant Perks says that the figure is $120,000.) In addition, a member of the Finance Committee says that USCF Sales and Hanon Russell owe $85,000 and this amount is put in "accounts receivable", but Hanon Russell is disputing this and says that he is not paying the money. The last time this happened was in 2005 when Hanon Russell was refusing to pay $145,000 that was owed and nevertheless that amount was included as an "account receivable". Eventually the board wrote off the entire $145,000, so we can feel certain that Hanon Russell is not going to be paying this $85,000 either. So, in reality, the USCF has lost $53,000 plus $120,000 plus $85,000, so the actual loss in real money this past fiscal year is $258,000, one of the biggest losses ever. And Bill Hall says, "I believe we did not do too poorly". When will they ever report the real numbers? Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan wrote:
Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF USCF Executive Director Bill Hall writes the following in the USCF BINFOS: "To the USCF Executive Board: "The audit is winding down and we should have a Draft for circulation by Tuesday. The bottom line should show a loss of $53,000. Although you never can be happy with a loss, considering the extra expenditures for Spectrum (and the profit-sharing plan), increased legal expenses, a significant write-off in inventory, and some significant losses on two investments, I believe we did not do too poorly this year." If the loss was really only $53,000 we might agree. By the way, that number includes $13,000 in unnecessary Internet Insurance that Joel Channing insisted that the USCF get to protect HIS assets. However, as Grant Perks explains in a posting to Susan's chessdiscussion group, that number is arrived at after the office ignored the $50,000 cap that the delegates voted to place on imaginary money received from the Life Membership Account. Grant Perks explains, "the office knows the year end adjustment will be made each year and they can spend based on the cap being reversed". The money is called "imaginary money" because the USCF office is supposed to receive $120,000 this year from the Life Membership Assets to service the the 10,000 life members who paid their life membership dues years ago and their funds were supposed to have been placed in a restricted reserve account. However, all of that money was "borrowed" out of that account years ago and in 2003 the account was closed. Therefore, the $120,000 is money the office is supposed to have received but does not actually get. (Usually, the amount is about $100,000, but this year Grant Perks says that the figure is $120,000.) In addition, a member of the Finance Committee says that USCF Sales and Hanon Russell owe $85,000 and this amount is put in "accounts receivable", but Hanon Russell is disputing this and says that he is not paying the money. The last time this happened was in 2005 when Hanon Russell was refusing to pay $145,000 that was owed and nevertheless that amount was included as an "account receivable". Eventually the board wrote off the entire $145,000, so we can feel certain that Hanon Russell is not going to be paying this $85,000 either. So, in reality, the USCF has lost $53,000 plus $120,000 plus $85,000, so the actual loss in real money this past fiscal year is $258,000, one of the biggest losses ever. And Bill Hall says, "I believe we did not do too poorly". When will they ever report the real numbers? Sam Sloan The real numbers will be ferreted out by the trustee in bankruptcy. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First Draft: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess | samsloan | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 4 | February 16th 08 03:46 PM |
| "half-truths, unsupported rumors and paranoid fantasies" | samsloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 9 | June 23rd 07 02:06 AM |
| $am $loan for USCF Executive Board | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 12 | May 2nd 06 08:24 PM |
| Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 9 | March 29th 06 11:52 PM |