A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 08, 01:52 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.accounting,rec.games.chess.computer,misc.legal
samsloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,798
Default Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF

Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF

USCF Executive Director Bill Hall writes the following in the USCF
BINFOS:

"To the USCF Executive Board:

"The audit is winding down and we should have a Draft for circulation
by Tuesday. The bottom line should show a loss of $53,000. Although
you never can be happy with a loss, considering the extra expenditures
for Spectrum (and the profit-sharing plan), increased legal expenses,
a significant write-off in inventory, and some significant losses on
two investments, I believe we did not do too poorly this year."


If the loss was really only $53,000 we might agree. By the way, that
number includes $13,000 in unnecessary Internet Insurance that Joel
Channing insisted that the USCF get to protect HIS assets.

However, as Grant Perks explains in a posting to Susan's
chessdiscussion group, that number is arrived at after the office
ignored the $50,000 cap that the delegates voted to place on imaginary
money received from the Life Membership Account. Grant Perks explains,
"the office knows the year end adjustment will be made each year and
they can spend based on the cap being reversed".

The money is called "imaginary money" because the USCF office is
supposed to receive $120,000 this year from the Life Membership Assets
to service the the 10,000 life members who paid their life membership
dues years ago and their funds were supposed to have been placed in a
restricted reserve account. However, all of that money was "borrowed"
out of that account years ago and in 2003 the account was closed.
Therefore, the $120,000 is money the office is supposed to have
received but does not actually get. (Usually, the amount is about
$100,000, but this year Grant Perks says that the figure is $120,000.)

In addition, a member of the Finance Committee says that USCF Sales
and Hanon Russell owe $85,000 and this amount is put in "accounts
receivable", but Hanon Russell is disputing this and says that he is
not paying the money. The last time this happened was in 2005 when
Hanon Russell was refusing to pay $145,000 that was owed and
nevertheless that amount was included as an "account receivable".
Eventually the board wrote off the entire $145,000, so we can feel
certain that Hanon Russell is not going to be paying this $85,000
either.

So, in reality, the USCF has lost $53,000 plus $120,000 plus $85,000,
so the actual loss in real money this past fiscal year is $258,000,
one of the biggest losses ever.

And Bill Hall says, "I believe we did not do too poorly".

When will they ever report the real numbers?

Sam Sloan
Ads
  #2  
Old July 23rd 08, 02:03 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.accounting,rec.games.chess.computer,misc.legal
Brian Lafferty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,067
Default Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF

samsloan wrote:
Another year of Fake Numbers from the USCF

USCF Executive Director Bill Hall writes the following in the USCF
BINFOS:

"To the USCF Executive Board:

"The audit is winding down and we should have a Draft for circulation
by Tuesday. The bottom line should show a loss of $53,000. Although
you never can be happy with a loss, considering the extra expenditures
for Spectrum (and the profit-sharing plan), increased legal expenses,
a significant write-off in inventory, and some significant losses on
two investments, I believe we did not do too poorly this year."


If the loss was really only $53,000 we might agree. By the way, that
number includes $13,000 in unnecessary Internet Insurance that Joel
Channing insisted that the USCF get to protect HIS assets.

However, as Grant Perks explains in a posting to Susan's
chessdiscussion group, that number is arrived at after the office
ignored the $50,000 cap that the delegates voted to place on imaginary
money received from the Life Membership Account. Grant Perks explains,
"the office knows the year end adjustment will be made each year and
they can spend based on the cap being reversed".

The money is called "imaginary money" because the USCF office is
supposed to receive $120,000 this year from the Life Membership Assets
to service the the 10,000 life members who paid their life membership
dues years ago and their funds were supposed to have been placed in a
restricted reserve account. However, all of that money was "borrowed"
out of that account years ago and in 2003 the account was closed.
Therefore, the $120,000 is money the office is supposed to have
received but does not actually get. (Usually, the amount is about
$100,000, but this year Grant Perks says that the figure is $120,000.)

In addition, a member of the Finance Committee says that USCF Sales
and Hanon Russell owe $85,000 and this amount is put in "accounts
receivable", but Hanon Russell is disputing this and says that he is
not paying the money. The last time this happened was in 2005 when
Hanon Russell was refusing to pay $145,000 that was owed and
nevertheless that amount was included as an "account receivable".
Eventually the board wrote off the entire $145,000, so we can feel
certain that Hanon Russell is not going to be paying this $85,000
either.

So, in reality, the USCF has lost $53,000 plus $120,000 plus $85,000,
so the actual loss in real money this past fiscal year is $258,000,
one of the biggest losses ever.

And Bill Hall says, "I believe we did not do too poorly".

When will they ever report the real numbers?

Sam Sloan


The real numbers will be ferreted out by the trustee in bankruptcy.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Draft: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess samsloan rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 4 February 16th 08 03:46 PM
"half-truths, unsupported rumors and paranoid fantasies" samsloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 June 23rd 07 02:06 AM
$am $loan for USCF Executive Board Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 12 May 2nd 06 08:24 PM
Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 9 March 29th 06 11:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Symbian Cell Phone Software - Credit Cards - BabbFest - Novela romantica - Hotels