A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

The Official Trolgar Attitude Toward the USCF Membership



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 19th 08, 11:58 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer
samsloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,796
Default The Official Trolgar Attitude Toward the USCF Membership

What Polgar actually wrote seems reasonable unless one considers the
fact that when they ran for election they knew that the board met four
times a year and the most important part of their duties was that they
would be expected to attend those four meeting.

It was known months in advance that there would be a meeting this past
weekend in Tulsa. No doubt some details were not provided but they
knew that there would be a meeting.

It is to be recalled that they announced that they would not be
attending the first meeting of the board, which was held in
Crossville, because of a "security breach". However, to everybody's
surprise, they showed up anyway. That is where they were served with a
summons and complaint.

The second meeting was held online because Truong refused to travel to
California to attend and Goichberg refused to travel to any other
state because he was living in California at the time.

Here is what Polgar (or Trollgar as they are known because it is
impossible to tell which are written by Polgar and which are written
by Truong) actually wrote explaining why she did not attend the third
meeting, that was held in Tulsa yesterday:

"A. Because the exact details were presented to us too late to make
the proper arrangements. Randy Bauer complained about this as well.
The details should have been given to all board members at least a
month in advance and not a week or so. Some board members do not have
children or just grown children. Their schedules are more flexible.

"B. Many board members have attended the meetings by phone in the
past. This is nothing unusual about this. I worry more about the state
of the USCF and not this issue. I am currently on 3 non-profit boards
and we do many of our meetings by phone with the other two.

"We met Bill G., Bill H., Jim B., Pat Knight and others in Tulsa. The
only 2 we did not meet were Randy Hough and Randy Bauer. Overall, the
meeting went quite well I think. I think we covered a lot of issues
which I believe will help the USCF. As I stated before, we obviously
have a number of differences in opinion and some compromises were
made. Most of the votes went 6-0 with a few minor abstentions.

"There will be more discussions with Bill Hall and Bill Goichberg in
the near future about increasing the USCF revenues via sponsorship,
advertisement, and donation. It is up to them to accept our offer to
help or not.

"Susan Polgar"
Ads
  #2  
Old May 21st 08, 09:58 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer
samsloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,796
Default The Official Trolgar Attitude Toward the USCF Membership

On May 21, 3:32 am, "Greg Wren" wrote:
Hold the conference electronically! That way it could be done more often.
Why travel all over the USA?


When I was on the board, the board exchanged emails almost every day.

A lot gets accomplished that way, but often the only real progress
comes when everybody is in the same room together.

Sam Sloan
  #3  
Old May 21st 08, 12:14 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer
Brian Lafferty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 625
Default The Official Trolgar Attitude Toward the USCF Membership

samsloan wrote:
On May 21, 3:32 am, "Greg Wren" wrote:
Hold the conference electronically! That way it could be done more often.
Why travel all over the USA?


When I was on the board, the board exchanged emails almost every day.

A lot gets accomplished that way, but often the only real progress
comes when everybody is in the same room together.

Sam Sloan


Meetings a la Resident Evil.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Draft: Blue Book Encyclopedia of Chess samsloan rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 4 February 16th 08 03:46 PM
Chaning Attacks Donna Alarie's Integrity B. Lafferty[_3_] rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 0 November 7th 07 03:00 AM
$am $loan for USCF Executive Board Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 12 May 2nd 06 08:24 PM
$am $loan for USCF Executive Board Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 11 May 2nd 06 08:24 PM
Reply to Affidavit of Leroy Dubeck Sam Sloan alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) 26 March 29th 05 04:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Science Articles Online - Bad Credit Mortgages - Mortgages - Wedding Flower Bouquet - Flights