A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Fine-Reshevsky Knight vs Bishop Semmering 1937



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 04, 06:00 AM
Nomen Nescio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fine-Reshevsky Knight vs Bishop Semmering 1937

This game ended in a draw in which Fine had knight and g- and h-pawns
against Reshevsky's bishop. In BASIC CHESS ENDINGS (page 215 of the
original edition), Fine gives an analysis including a missed win before
the knight plus two pawns vs bishop position was reached. Averbakh seems
to agree that the game was drawn after that point.

Anthony Saidy reviewed the new edition of BCE on Jeremy Silman's
web site. I think he is claiming that an analysis by Moroney in 1970
showed this could be won, with one of the key moves being g6.

Has anybody seen details of this? Maybe it could be checked
using a six-man database.

Ads
  #2  
Old October 16th 04, 06:56 PM
Doctor SBD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This position is not part of the six man tablebases, which does not yet include
all possible six man positions.

SBD
  #3  
Old October 16th 04, 07:06 PM
Doctor SBD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Additionally I have checked Moroney's analysis with a computer and it seems to
lead to a draw after all. So perhaps GM Benko just didn't include it, but it
would of course been better to show the refutation!

SBD
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I demasked Masked Bishop - He is Randy Bauer Goran Tomic rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 127 June 19th 04 07:32 AM
What do you think of my method of king, bishop, and knight checkmate? Robert Richter rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 23 March 27th 04 02:14 AM
Would anyone with chessbase analyse this game? Dr. David Kirkby rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 16 January 2nd 04 11:57 AM
Would anyone with chessbase analyse this game? Dr. David Kirkby rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 16 January 2nd 04 11:57 AM
Bishops are definitely better than knights Alex Dvorak rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 24 November 25th 03 11:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - TurboTax Software - Facebook proxy list - Mobile Phone - Mobile Phone