![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 1d4, against, gambits |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a friend who always starts with 1.d4, and plays a slow,
strategic game to win in the endgame. This takes a long time and it's quite frustrating for me. So here's my question. Do you have any offbeat gambits against 1.d4 that I could use to surprise my opponent? It doesn't have to be 100% sound or anything, I just want to try something new and different. Thanks Toey |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The direct gambits against 1.d4 are not very sound but maybe worth a
shot. You may look up: Budapest Defence, Albin Counter, von Hennig-Schara, Englund. You can strive for active play without going the gambit route: the Dutch Defence, the Nimzo-Indian, the King's Indian, the ben-Oni Defences (and relatives), the Benlo gambit, some versions of the semi-Slave (although White has the exchange variations.) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
ben-Oni This is more commonly written `Benoni', though Wikipedia says the name comes from the Hebrew for `son of sorrow' so your version is probably more historically accurate. Benlo gambit [...] semi-Slave `Benko gambit' and `semi-Slav'. (I point these typos out not in order to deride ttw's very helpful post but to help the original poster search for information on these openings.) Dave. -- David Richerby Addictive Cheese (TM): it's like a www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ brick of cheese but you can never put it down! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have found that 1.d4 d5 followed by a quick ...c5 often leads to more open
games with lots of piece play. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"mike" wrote in message ... I have found that 1.d4 d5 followed by a quick ...c5 often leads to more open games with lots of piece play. heh heh |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
42N83W wrote:
"mike" wrote in message ... I have found that 1.d4 d5 followed by a quick ...c5 often leads to more open games with lots of piece play. heh heh To me, 1. d4 used to mean locked pawns, where pieces jockey for ideal positions for 30 moves and then an all-out tactical blitz ensues when our clocks run low. it doesn't have to be that way--it can be tactical. You don't have to change openings. As Mike said, a simple c5 early on often opens up the game. dxc4 or any other pawn exchange will also do the trick. If you really want a new opening, the QGD / Tarrasch Defense uses the first move; the QGD / Slav Defense uses the second. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1...d6 Defensive Suystem | Lloyd Uhler | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 0 | January 13th 06 10:51 PM |
| 7m blitz (2005-11-01), 1.d4 Nf6 Nc3 | Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (wlod) | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 0 | November 2nd 05 10:58 AM |
| 7m blitz (2005-11-01), 1.d4 Nf6 Nc3 | Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (wlod) | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 2nd 05 10:58 AM |
| Good Openings for E-Mail Chess | Lloyd Uhler | rec.games.chess.play-by-email (Chess - Play by Email) | 0 | October 24th 05 03:40 PM |
| recommend me on queen gambit. 1.d4 | jamiejar | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | October 3rd 05 11:42 AM |