![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: between, funny, game, getclub, jester |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Good luck on your website! |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sanny wrote: I used to think Jester plays very good, But today in a game with Beginner Level, It lost a winning game. Um, no, it did not. It's pretty obvious that "somebody" intervened to stop the game when it became apparent that the GetClub program was making zero headway. That "somebody" seems to have unjustly forfeited the Jester program, when it was doing just fine on the board (see link below). View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?...934&game=Chess So what do you think about this game was it won because of Jester Mistake or it was won because of good moves by GetClub Beginner Level. Neither one; the game was not completed, so we will never know what the result would have been had it been played out in accordance with the rules of chess, and not halted prematurely. Do you find the moves much stronger than earlier or you still find mistakes in the game of GetClub Beginner Level. In this game, Jester was winning but it tried to win the Bishop on d8 and in the process, it let a passed pawn get too far. (The Bishop could have easily been won by pinning it with a Rook instead of chasing it with the Knight, which was rather busy defending a key pawn.) In the final stage, the GetClub program seemed unable to manage anything more than -- at best -- a perpetual check. In fact, there was still a chance that Jester could have advanced its passed pawn up the board and ultimately promoted it, then gone on to *win* the game. Believe it or not, I've seen that sort of thing done to 2100 players, so it's not a stretch here. The same old problem reared its ugly head once mo the GetClub program refuses to activate its King-- ever. A lone Queen cannot administer checkmate except in unusual circumstances, so by keeping its King "safe", the Beginner level in effect throws away its material advantage in the endgame. This is a *huge* weakness, even if the opponent must somehow survive to an endgame for it to manifest itself. Here is an oversimplified solution: if the material remaining on the board adds up to less than X number of points, switch from a King-safety bonus to a small penalty. Better yet, always give a bonus in the scoring for *mobility*, including the King, but offset this in the early part of the game. In other words, in the endgame, a King which is in a corner can only "attack" three squares, so this will be penalized in comparison to a King in the center of the board, which "attacks" eight squares. I don't have a /simple/ solution to the problem of when is it good versus when is it bad to activate the King; that's a judgment call, requiring enormous skill-- which is why I keep winning and GC keeps losing. ;D -- help bot |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
first move out of the Benko book, and black goes wrong.
i assume 'nomal' level is here measured in seconds - or about 2 minutes a move. 6. a2-a3{36} a7-a5{104} 7. a3-b4{72} c5-b4{100} 8. e2-e4{18} e7-e5{120} 9. Bf1-d3{26} d7-d6{92} 10. Nd2-b3{20} h7-h5{150} then another 5 consecutive pawn moves, making 9 out of 10 Yes, I found that there was something wrong with positional analysis and it was playing pawns.unnecesarily. Now the Problem has been corrected. Can you tell me something about what are the good squares for White Bishop and White Knights? And how much penalty should be given to a King when it is moved without Chastling. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 12, 10:51*am, help bot wrote:
Sanny wrote: I used to think Jester plays very good, But today in a game with Beginner Level, It lost a winning game. * Um, no, it did not. *It's pretty obvious that "somebody" intervened to stop the game when it became apparent that theGetClubprogram was making zero headway. * That "somebody" seems to have unjustly forfeited the Jester program, when it was doing just fine on the board (see link below). View Recorded Game:http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?...934&game=Chess So what do you think about this game was *it won because of Jester Mistake or it was won because of good moves byGetClubBeginner Level. *Neither one; the game was not completed, so we will never know what the result would have been had it been played out in accordance with the rules ofchess, and not halted prematurely. I do not complete the game as Much of it was over and It would have taken 30-40 moves for GetClub to win. As it know nothing in end game. The reasion it plays bad in End Game is That In end game you are not getting any advantage of killing pieces So all moves are equal unless it sees a Mate move. But that wont stop me from developing end game. Butr let me first make the Middle Game Perfect. Once it becomes perfect in Middle Game I think End Game can be taught later. Most Often if the opponent is loosing a game It will atleast save its pieces and force the opponent to Resign. After playing 10-20 Moves Opponent will understand It cannot win and will Resign. Incase it has equal Material the Game will draw by Three fold repetition. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
A new game between Jester and Beginner Level. Here again Beginner lost
badly was there a way to save its pawns? Game Played between sanjay11 and beginner at GetClub.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jester: (White) beginner: (Black) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?...357&game=Chess -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- White -- Black (Jester) -- (beginner) 1. e2-e4{4} e7-e6{0} 2. d2-d4{6} d7-d5{0} 3. e4-d5{6} e6-d5{0} 4. Bf1-d3{6} Ng8-f6{0} 5. Bc1-g5{12} Nb8-c6{8} 6. Qd1-e2{14} Bc8-e6{6} 7. Bd3-b5{18} Bf8-b4{10} 8. c2-c3{10} Bb4-d6{8} 9. Bb5-c6{10} b7-c6{6} 10. Qe2-a6{12} Qd8-c8{6} 11. Qa6-c8{24} Ra8-c8{6} 12. Bg5-f6{14} g7-f6{8} 13. Ng1-f3{10} c6-c5{8} 14. Nb1-d2{12} Rh8-g8{8} 15. g2-g3{16} Rg8-g6{8} 16. Ke1-c1{12} c5-c4{10} 17. Nf3-h4{10} Rg6-g7{8} 18. Rh1-e1{14} Bd6-e7{6} 19. f2-f4{10} f6-f5{6} 20. Nh4-f3{12} c7-c5{6} 21. Nd2-f1{14} Be7-f6{6} 22. Nf1-e3{12} Ke8-f8{6} 23. Kc1-c2{10} h7-h6{8} 24. Rd1-d2{10} Rg7-g6{8} 25. d4-c5{10} Rc8-c5{6} 26. Re1-d1{10} Rc5-b5{6} 27. Ne3-d5{12} Bf6-g7{8} 28. Nf3-h4{12} Rg6-g4{8} 29. Nd5-e3{12} Bg7-f6{6} 30. Ne3-g4{16} f5-g4{10} 31. Nh4-g2{10} Rb5-h5{8} 32. Ng2-e3{12} Rh5-b5{6} 33. Rd2-d6{12} Bf6-e7{6} 34. Rd6-a6{10} Rb5-h5{12} 35. Rd1-d2{14} Be7-c5{6} 36. Ra6-a5{12} Kf8-g7{10} 37. Kc2-d1{12} Kg7-h7{8} 38. Ne3-c4{10} Kh7-h8{8} 39. Nc4-e3{10} Be6-a2{8} 40. b2-b4{10} Ba2-b3{8} 41. Ne3-c2{12} f7-f6{6} 42. b4-c5{14} Bb3-g8{6} 43. Nc2-e3{14} f6-f5{8} 44. c5-c6{12} Rh5-h3{14} 45. Rd2-d8{38} Rh3-h2{10} 46. Kd1-e1{10} a7-a6{6} 47. c6-c7{10} Rh2-h1{8} 48. Ne3-f1{10} Kh8-g7{6} 49. Qc7-c8{Q}{12} Bg8-f7{6} 50. Qc8-f5{12} Bf7-c4{8} 51. Rd8-d7{8} Kg7-g8{6} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jester : (White) beginner: (Black) Game Played at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html View Recorded Game: http://www.getclub.com/playgame.php?...357&game=Chess Here again Beginner lost badly was there a way to save its pawns? It has to sac its rook for no reasion else its two pawns would get killed. So it lost badly. I think it played the opening badly, What do you say which were the worst moves by GetClub Chess. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sanny" wrote in message ... first move out of the Benko book, and black goes wrong. i assume 'nomal' level is here measured in seconds - or about 2 minutes a move. 6. a2-a3{36} a7-a5{104} 7. a3-b4{72} c5-b4{100} 8. e2-e4{18} e7-e5{120} 9. Bf1-d3{26} d7-d6{92} 10. Nd2-b3{20} h7-h5{150} then another 5 consecutive pawn moves, making 9 out of 10 Yes, I found that there was something wrong with positional analysis and it was playing pawns.unnecesarily. Now the Problem has been corrected. Of course it has. Can you tell me something about what are the good squares for White Bishop and White Knights? Yes. It depends on 2 things; the position of your pawns, and also the position of the other player's pawns. For instance - for black, remove the Benko from your opening book, [take out the b5 move], and stick to a Modern Benoni, see also Czech Benoni, and Old Benoni. The Benko is a gambit which offers to give up a pawn for strategic pressure against the White Q side - because your program can't see any further than the NY Times Blog page, then you too should avoid strategic ventures for a moment's actions. And how much penalty should be given to a King when it is moved without Chastling. It should be put into a cage with Messers Lafferty and Sloan for 20 minutes - then the boy'll learn to chastle early! and chastle right! You might also think of penalising it for every move it stays in the centre after move 10 - look what happened to them! But most of all you should leave here for 6 months and talk to the people in chess.computer and learn about their evaluation rubrics [also for free]. If you leave you King in the centre, the whole game becomes about you and your king [like "ego", no?] And its not paranoia - All the other player's pieces are //really// out to get you while you are stuck in the center. The only problem with this practice is that while it suits meglomaniacs, it almost always loses ;( A sad story, but true. Cordially, Phil Innes Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 12, 2:38 am, Sanny wrote:
Neither one; the game was not completed, so we will never know what the result would have been had it been played out in accordance with the rules ofchess, and not halted prematurely. I do not complete the game as Much of it was over and It would have taken 30-40 moves for GetClub to win. I disagree; the program was obviously playing meaningless spite checks, which could very easily have led to a draw, or in some cases where it may attempt to avoid a repetition, to the opponent advancing its pawn to become a Queen (and possibly even win). There is no reason to assume it was going to inevitably win. You can /say/ that GC won the game, but it did not; a game is "won" via checkmate, or the resignation of the other program-- neither of which occurred. As it know nothing in end game. See? All those mean critics who kept saying that Sanny knows nothing about chess are hereby proved wrong! He knows enough to recognize that his program knows nothing in the endgame-- the very same assessment a grandmaster would have made. ;D The reasion it plays bad in End Game is That In end game you are not getting any advantage of killing pieces So all moves are equal unless it sees a Mate move. Mobility: this is the key. The mobility of the chess men must be scored, so that that of the enemy is minimized, and that of the GC program is maximized. This can often lead to checkmate. But that wont stop me from developing end game. Butr let me first make the Middle Game Perfect. Once it becomes perfect in Middle Game I think End Game can be taught later. If you can get the openings perfect and the middle game perfect, you may not /need/ an endgame anymore! It's like dropping a nuke and then sending in the National Guard to "mop up". (Just hand out some purple rain-suits and tell them that wearing them will protect them from the radiation.) Most Often if the opponent is loosing a game It will atleast save its pieces and force the opponent to Resign. Some players are no doubt "resigning" only because there is no other way to stop the game and begin another one; this is a flaw in the interface-- there is no way to stop a drawn game (such as K & N vs. K) apart from resigning. Although such games are scored at GetClub as "wins" for the computer, they are in fact drawn according to the laws of chess. -- help bot |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
* Some players are no doubt "resigning"
only because there is no other way to stop the game and begin another one; this is a flaw in the interface-- there is no way to stop a drawn game (such as K & N vs. K) apart from resigning. *Although such games are scored atGetClubas "wins" for the computer, they are in fact drawn according to the laws ofchess. In case of (such as K & N vs. K) Program will automatically give Draw. Here are the cases where the Game will automatically end in draw. 1. K vs K 2. K-N vs K 3. K-B vs K 4. K-B vs K-N 5. K-N vs K-B 6. K-R vs K-N 7. K-R vs K-B 8. K-Q vs K-R In all above end games the game will endup as a draw. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 13, 1:24 am, Sanny wrote:
Some players are no doubt "resigning" only because there is no other way to stop the game and begin another one; this is a flaw in the interface-- there is no way to stop a drawn game (such as K & N vs. K) apart from resigning. Although such games are scored atGetClubas "wins" for the computer, they are in fact drawn according to the laws ofchess. In case of (such as K & N vs. K) Program will automatically give Draw. Here are the cases where the Game will automatically end in draw. 1. K vs K 2. K-N vs K 3. K-B vs K 4. K-B vs K-N 5. K-N vs K-B 6. K-R vs K-N 7. K-R vs K-B 8. K-Q vs K-R In all above end games the game will endup as a draw. That is all mucked up. In cases where it is K-R vs. K-N, some positions allow the Knight to be "cornered", then captured; for this to happen, the King and Knight must be separated from one another-- preferably in opposite corners. In some cases of K-R vs. K-B, if the weaker side's King is against the side, it may be possible to force a win (using /zugzwang/). In any case, the laws of chess allow for an attempt to be made-- up to the fifty moves. And of course, in K-Q vs. K-R, it is always a forced win if the side with a Queen is not already in a mess. Once again, it is not possible to demonstrate an "attacking" strategy which forces the win; to the contrary, the win can be accomplished using a combination of attacks, plus /zugzwang/. Also note that only the K vs. K, K-N vs. K, K-B vs. K, and K-B vs. K- same color B are drawn automatically (insufficient mating material), according to the laws of chess. Let me just say that before everyone jumps on Sanny for not knowing this stuff, I once played a USCF-rated Expert who offered me a draw after the game was already over! I believe it was K-N vs. K, or something like that. LOL -- help bot |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Today 2 big bugs were removed So It will play much better game, I saw
the game you won with Master. Actually I can see a few wrong moves by that bug. But now I think you will not get those weak moves atleast with Higher Levels. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GetClub Chess beat Jester in just 28 Moves !!! | Sanny | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 7 | February 11th 08 10:21 AM |
| An very interesting game between GetClub & Jester. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 0 | November 1st 07 07:02 PM |
| An very interesting game between GetClub & Jester. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 1 | November 1st 07 05:14 PM |
| An very interesting game between GetClub & Jester. | Sanny | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | November 1st 07 05:14 PM |
| An very interesting game between GetClub & Jester. | Sanny | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 1 | November 1st 07 05:14 PM |