![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: beginner, end, game, getclub, moves, played, rybka, till |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
However below things may be improved Like
1. End Game 2. Think on Opponents Time 3. Use Dual/Core Quad Core power To which I would add 4. Play by the rules of chess. |
| Ads |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 23, 4:36 pm, yearlypap08
wrote: could try Rybka on an easier level, or else try the GNU engine. The GNU chess engine is much stronger than Jester, Try a game with GNU vs. GetClub and see what I mean. http://chess.delorie.com/ The default is 1 second think time per move. (Its range is 1/10th sec to 2 min think time per move) ok, i've done that, getclub at easy level, and delorie/gnu at approx 1 min/move but in fact it moved much faster. even although GNU was choosing a risky (Cochrane) gambit sacrificing a knight in the opening (never do that against rybka i would say..), Getclub was easily beaten white: GNUchess/delorie black: getclub 1.e4 e5 2,Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 (Petrov) 4.Nxf7?! Kxf7 (Cochrane gambit) 5.d4 Qe7 6.Nc3 Ke8 7.Bg5 Nc6 8.Bc4 a6 9.0-0 Qd7 10.Rfe1 Be7 11.e5 dxe5 12.dxe5 Ng4? 13.Nd5 Bg5 14.e6! Qd8 15.Qg4 b5 16.Qf3 Rhf8 17.Qh5 g6 18.Qxh7 Nce7 19.Nde7 Rf2 20.Nd5 Qd6 21.Qg8 Rf8 22.Qg6 Kd8 23.Qg5 Ke8 24.Qh5 Kd8 (black, i.e. getclub no says 'i'm winning boy.. :- ) 25.e7 Qe7 26.Ne7 c6 27.Qc5 Kd7 28.Qc6 Kc6 and resigns 1-0 (sorry for the imperfect notation, entered it by hand, so it might have some little mistakes while getclub seems to have some potential to become a better engine, i would advise Sanny to develop a standalone version in c or so, compatible with UCI or winboard, and start some testing against other engines. after move 20/25 or so kings attack seems to understood quite bad by the engine (also seen this in one test game against rybka). and while the java interface isnt really bad, some features could be improved of course, especially the notation (like eg. P-to-e4 for pawn move, why not make it compatible with pgn notation) PS but personally i wouldnt be surprised if the chess game is just a test case and Sanny would be more interested to get participants in his clubs to sell it later for a few millions to google or so; certainly a more sensible business strategy then trying to build yet another best chess or Go engine.. ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Analyze this game between GetClub & Zester played today | Sanny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 1 | February 18th 08 09:18 AM |
| GetClub game again Improved !!! | Sanny | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | January 18th 08 12:40 PM |