![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: defense, question, slav |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, i am very new to chess. I started playing about 6 months ago, so the
solution to the question i have may be obvious, but i cannot see it. From what i have read the slav defense goes like 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 i.e. black does not take the gambit and decides on strengthening his d5 pawn. next, (as you all know) the main variations are like 3.Nc3 or 3.Nf3, the goal developing a piece and defending d4 (in case of Nf3) or preparing e4 (in case of Nc3). What about 3.b3 ? white could defend c4 and try to gain control of the queenside with a nice pawn structure. maybe sometime in the future playing c5 and b4. Well, as i could not find any comments on this move the pawn structure resulting from it may not be so nice and the move may not be recommended, but i fail to see why. Could anybody here help me? Thanks, Tobias |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Tobias Heidelmann wrote: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 i.e. black does not take the gambit and decides on strengthening his d5 pawn. next, (as you all know) the main variations are like 3.Nc3 or 3.Nf3, the goal developing a piece and defending d4 (in case of Nf3) or preparing e4 (in case of Nc3). What about 3.b3 ? white could defend c4 and try to gain control of the queenside with a nice pawn structure. maybe sometime in the future playing c5 and b4. Well, as i could not find any comments on this move the pawn structure resulting from it may not be so nice and the move may not be recommended, but i fail to see why. Well, you're violating opening principles, for starters, by moving pawns which you don't have to move. c4 doesn't really need pawn support. You're defending it, from what? An eventual e-pawn move (which furthers white's development) does the same thing, but really, white doesn't want to discourage black from abandoning the center. b3 also takes moves like Qb3 (with double attack on d4 and b7 - it's a very thematic move) or Qa5 (which works well with moves like Nf3-e5) away from white. -Ron |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ron schrieb:
Well, you're violating opening principles, for starters, by moving pawns which you don't have to move. c4 doesn't really need pawn support. You're defending it, from what? An eventual e-pawn move (which furthers white's development) does the same thing, but really, white doesn't want to discourage black from abandoning the center. b3 also takes moves like Qb3 (with double attack on d4 and b7 - it's a very thematic move) or Qa5 (which works well with moves like Nf3-e5) away from white. -Ron ok, thanks. so basically the pawn on c4 is an encouragement for white to leave d5. i guess that is why it is called a gambit. sometimes i just cannot see the obvious. thank you for mentioning the queen moves. i have trouble finding good moves in a given opening position. Tobias |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
ok, thanks. so basically the pawn on c4 is an encouragement for white to
leave d5. i guess that is why it is called a gambit. sometimes i just cannot see the obvious. thank you for mentioning the queen moves. i have trouble finding good moves in a given opening position. You need to practise Chess a lot. I think your rating is 1200+ You should play at GetClub Chess with Beginner Level. I am also 1100 Rated. Beginner is 1800+ Play Chess: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html Have a game Daily and you will find your game improved a lot. It plays Opening moves in the beginning and then a very strong Middle game. Beginner: 5-10 sec/ move. So you can complete a game with beginner Level in just 5 min. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scandinavian Defense question | renaissanceman@i-plus.net | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | September 13th 07 01:37 AM |
| Win with Damiano's Defense | samsloan | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 11 | August 10th 07 05:03 PM |
| Win with Damiano's Defense | samsloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 11 | August 10th 07 05:03 PM |
| Slav defense with Bg4 | levelerman2000@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 2 | October 1st 06 01:46 PM |
| Tarrasch defense question | Ron | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 3 | December 12th 05 04:33 PM |