A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners


Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 4th 08, 06:14 PM posted to rec.games.chess.analysis
external usenet poster
Posts: 110

I wrote a post a while back on a draw between a queen and a rook.
Obviously in theory its not a draw. Its a clear win for the queen. But
unless one knows how to accurately play, the rook and king could just
wangle out a draw PROVIDED the player with the queen makes a mistake.
It could be an obvious mistake which may result in the rook taking out
the queen and the king than taking out the rook leaving only the kings
on board, or it could be a mistake whereby the player with the queen
comes so close with the king and queen as to result in a stalemate.
But if the player with the queen is smart and careful than it is
always a win. No matter what the rook player does he or she will lose.
Theoritically its a win but in practice its not so easy.

Now, if the two knights with the king is a THEORITICAL draw vs the
queen with the king while the rook and king vs the queen and king is a
THEORITICAL WIN for the queen, the assumption here would be that its
better to have two knights vs just a rook. HOWEVER, if we take an end
game with just two kings and one side only having a rook and take an
end game with just the two kings and one side having only 2 knights.
Even a child would take the end game with the rook and king because
winning is a certainty. (Unless the person blunders). Winning with two
knights is a virtual impossibility. Unless the other player stupidly
corners himself or herself in such a ridiculous position and even then
the player with two knights has to be careful to avoid a stalemate. In
practicality a win is most unlikely. However, with a rook and king
even a child can win the game.

STILL when it comes to an end game with the queen and one has to
defend oneself, having two knights together with the king is a better
defence vs having the rook with the king. Now I find this extremely

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2018 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.