![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: clock, deducts, digital, erroneously, minutes, opponent |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just played a game where I showed up a couple of minutes late. My
opponent was using a Digital Clock, set for the appropriate default Time Delay. However, he also had deducted 5 minutes from each clock, apparently based on the erroneous assumption that such a deduction was mandatory. I talked to the Tournament Director, and he had made no announcement that instructed players to make this time deduction. Indeed, since the play took place on a Club meeting weeknight, and there was only one round that evening, time was not of the essence, at least in terms of keeping to a tournament schedule for the rounds. My understanding is that the default option is NOT to deduct the 5 minutes from the clocks, unless specifically instructed to do so by the TD. Morever, the new rule book apparently states that deducting the 5 minutes is not the preferred option, and is clearly not the default option. Rather, it is an option that should be taken **By the TD** when, for instance, a tournament is running behind schedule, and the TD is worried that the next round will be delayed. By implication, the TD probably ought not be mandating a time deduction for every round, unless there is a specific and pressing reason to do so. Moreover, such a time deduction must be made only when announced by the TD; it should not be made by the players thenselves, unless they are directed to do so. My question is: In the situation described above, do I have the right to complain to the TD, and request that the incorrectly deducted time be restored to my clock. If the time is restored to my clock, is it proper to also have the time restored to my opponent's clock, even though he mis-set his own clock, in ignorance of the rules? |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for convincing me never to direct a tournament.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... My question is: ..., do I have the right to complain to the TD, But of course. You'd be surprised at how many exercise this right time and time again. Sigh. StanB |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
if you did not show up on time, you have no standing to dispute the matter.
i am not sure your understanding of the rule is correct. are you refering to uschess rules or another national system? "Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... I just played a game where I showed up a couple of minutes late. My opponent was using a Digital Clock, set for the appropriate default Time Delay. However, he also had deducted 5 minutes from each clock, apparently based on the erroneous assumption that such a deduction was mandatory. I talked to the Tournament Director, and he had made no announcement that instructed players to make this time deduction. Indeed, since the play took place on a Club meeting weeknight, and there was only one round that evening, time was not of the essence, at least in terms of keeping to a tournament schedule for the rounds. My understanding is that the default option is NOT to deduct the 5 minutes from the clocks, unless specifically instructed to do so by the TD. Morever, the new rule book apparently states that deducting the 5 minutes is not the preferred option, and is clearly not the default option. Rather, it is an option that should be taken **By the TD** when, for instance, a tournament is running behind schedule, and the TD is worried that the next round will be delayed. By implication, the TD probably ought not be mandating a time deduction for every round, unless there is a specific and pressing reason to do so. Moreover, such a time deduction must be made only when announced by the TD; it should not be made by the players thenselves, unless they are directed to do so. My question is: In the situation described above, do I have the right to complain to the TD, and request that the incorrectly deducted time be restored to my clock. If the time is restored to my clock, is it proper to also have the time restored to my opponent's clock, even though he mis-set his own clock, in ignorance of the rules? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The default way is to not deduct. The USCF has very little interest in
explaining these rules to its members. I would guess less than 1% of players, and less than 50% of directors are well versed in time dealy and sudden death rules. I have done a lot of study of these rules and have spoken to MANY ANTDs and NTDs and still feel do not feel confident. Your opponent incorrectly set the clock, but not intentionally. Both sides should get an extra 5 min and the game continue, as people before me have stated. The USCF should update its webpage from 1999 and explain the rules for SD and time delay in a clear and concise fashion. They should also take 1/4 of a page or so in each Chess Life issue to explain these procedures. I have directed and played in over 100 tournaments, and almost nobody knows or understands time delay and sudden death rules. IM and Senior TD Ben Finegold "marc margolies" wrote in message ... if you did not show up on time, you have no standing to dispute the matter. i am not sure your understanding of the rule is correct. are you refering to uschess rules or another national system? "Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... I just played a game where I showed up a couple of minutes late. My opponent was using a Digital Clock, set for the appropriate default Time Delay. However, he also had deducted 5 minutes from each clock, apparently based on the erroneous assumption that such a deduction was mandatory. I talked to the Tournament Director, and he had made no announcement that instructed players to make this time deduction. Indeed, since the play took place on a Club meeting weeknight, and there was only one round that evening, time was not of the essence, at least in terms of keeping to a tournament schedule for the rounds. My understanding is that the default option is NOT to deduct the 5 minutes from the clocks, unless specifically instructed to do so by the TD. Morever, the new rule book apparently states that deducting the 5 minutes is not the preferred option, and is clearly not the default option. Rather, it is an option that should be taken **By the TD** when, for instance, a tournament is running behind schedule, and the TD is worried that the next round will be delayed. By implication, the TD probably ought not be mandating a time deduction for every round, unless there is a specific and pressing reason to do so. Moreover, such a time deduction must be made only when announced by the TD; it should not be made by the players thenselves, unless they are directed to do so. My question is: In the situation described above, do I have the right to complain to the TD, and request that the incorrectly deducted time be restored to my clock. If the time is restored to my clock, is it proper to also have the time restored to my opponent's clock, even though he mis-set his own clock, in ignorance of the rules? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Isidor Gunsberg" wrote in message om... I just played a game where I showed up a couple of minutes late. My opponent was using a Digital Clock, set for the appropriate default Time Delay. However, he also had deducted 5 minutes from each clock, apparently based on the erroneous assumption that such a deduction was mandatory. [Sob story snipped] The players should not mess with the clocks before a game, i had this at a tourney I arrived late but just as the TD announced to start white's clocks, 5 mins was missing from time so I reset the clock, my opponent was not pleased , until I suggested he explain how 5 mins could have passed since he announced to start the matches. Thankfully I went on to cane the guy, with a variation of the Vienna ..... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|