A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

can someone analyze this?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 16th 14, 04:50 AM posted to rec.games.chess.analysis
Raj Sekhar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default can someone analyze this?

[Event "7398"]
[Site "AICCF"]
[White "Khan, Shams"]
[Black "Atteri, Rajasekhar"]
[EventDate "2014.02.20"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Date "2014.05.16"]

1.e4 c5 2.f4 d6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Nc3 g6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.Bc4 Bg7 7.O-O e6 8.d3 Nge7
9.Be3 a6 10.Bf2 O-O 11.a3 Nd4 12.Nxd4 Bxd4 13.Ba2 Nc6 14.Qe1 Qa5 15.Bxd4 cxd4 16.Ne2 Qxe1
17.Raxe1 Kg7 18.f5 e5 19.f6+ Kg8 20.Bd5 Rac8 21.c4 Rb8 22.b4 Nd8 23.Rc1 Ne6 24.c5 Nc7
25.cxd6 Nb5 26.Kf2 Nxd6 27.Ng1 Nb5 28.Nf3 Rfe8 29.Ng5 Rf8 30.Rc4 h6 31.Nf3 Rfe8 32.Re1 g5
33.h3 b6 34.a4 Nd6 35.Rc7 Bxa4 36.Rec1 Bb5 37.Ke2 Kh7 38.Bxf7 Nxf7 39.Rxf7+ Kg6 40.Rcc7 Rbc8
41.Rg7+ Kxf6 42.Rcf7+ Ke6 43.Rb7 1-0


I was playing black and was happy to exchange many of the pieces by move 17. I didnt think my doubled pawns would be a liability. After that I am not able to figure out what I should have played differently.

Any inputs will be appreciated.

Thanks
Sekhar Atteri
  #2  
Old October 8th 16, 03:05 AM
Radrook Radrook is offline
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by ChessBanter: Oct 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raj Sekhar View Post
[Event "7398"]
[Site "AICCF"]
[White "Khan, Shams"]
[Black "Atteri, Rajasekhar"]
[EventDate "2014.02.20"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Date "2014.05.16"]

1.e4 c5 2.f4 d6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Nc3 g6 5.Bb5 Bd7 6.Bc4 Bg7 7.O-O e6 8.d3 Nge7
9.Be3 a6 10.Bf2 O-O 11.a3 Nd4 12.Nxd4 Bxd4 13.Ba2 Nc6 14.Qe1 Qa5 15.Bxd4 cxd4 16.Ne2 Qxe1
17.Raxe1 Kg7 18.f5 e5 19.f6+ Kg8 20.Bd5 Rac8 21.c4 Rb8 22.b4 Nd8 23.Rc1 Ne6 24.c5 Nc7
25.cxd6 Nb5 26.Kf2 Nxd6 27.Ng1 Nb5 28.Nf3 Rfe8 29.Ng5 Rf8 30.Rc4 h6 31.Nf3 Rfe8 32.Re1 g5
33.h3 b6 34.a4 Nd6 35.Rc7 Bxa4 36.Rec1 Bb5 37.Ke2 Kh7 38.Bxf7 Nxf7 39.Rxf7+ Kg6 40.Rcc7 Rbc8
41.Rg7+ Kxf6 42.Rcf7+ Ke6 43.Rb7 1-0


I was playing black and was happy to exchange many of the pieces by move 17. I didnt think my doubled pawns would be a liability. After that I am not able to figure out what I should have played differently.

Any inputs will be appreciated.

Thanks
Sekhar Atteri
Thanks for allowing me to analyze your game.
Unfortunately I had to stop because the annotation went awry.


Sicilian Defense
1.e4 c5

2.f4 d6

Aggressive play which carries a certain risk due to opening immediate avenues towards the white king.

3.Nf3 Nc6

4.Nc3 g6

Characteristic of the Dragon Sicilian where counter-play is planned along the long diagonal.

5.Bb5 Bd7

Immediately unpinning the knight.

Please note that the problem with the Bb5 is that one must either be willing to exchange it for the knight or else have it kicked out of the area via black's pawn pushes a7-a6 and b7 - b5 which he achieves via a gain of tempo.

Unfortunately in this position the Bishop would be unable to retreat to b3 since the pawn push to c4 would trap it there. But even if he could it would be temporarily trapped in that corner and out of play.

So if the pawn attack is started immediately he must retreat beyond that possibility or capture the knight or of suffer tempo and space losses.

6.Bc4

Needless loss of tempo since all the Bishop accomplished was to provoke a development of a black piece.

Bg7

Developing the bishop. Two pieces developed while white moved Bishop twice.

7.O-O e6

To prevent the knight from honing in on f7.

8.d3 Nge7 ?????????

Here I stop because neither of the Knights are in any position to go to the seventh rank. Annotation needs tweaking. Not saying that the two tempo losses due to moving the bishop twice contributed significantly to the loss of the game since I could not examine the whole game.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze? Sanny rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 29 May 13th 08 05:05 AM
Zebediah win against the Advance Level, Please Analyze? Sanny rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 34 May 13th 08 05:05 AM
Please Analyze the Advance Level best Game Sanny rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 6 April 23rd 08 10:47 AM
Please Analyze this Game. Sanny rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) 10 March 14th 07 10:39 PM
Please Analyze this Game. Sanny rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 10 March 14th 07 10:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright 2004-2017 ChessBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.