![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2000, chessmaster, dos, playing, strength |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi EZoto,
Be assured, there is nothing 'wrong' with CM 3000! De initial versions of CM were definititely fun to play with and would still be suitable for the occasional player. It's just that with CM 4000 there was a sentational improvement in playing strength. Bedore that, CM had never really been taken seriously as compared to the Big Guys like Rebel, Chess Genius and Fritz. "EZoto" schreef in bericht news:50fc7e35ea82cafa356994b944fb8755@TeraNews... I wouldn't bother with any versions before CM 4000. I would like to know what is wrong with CM 3000. I'm not defending it or anything but I have it on a computer with Win 3.1 and it works very well and it plays pretty strong. I collect Win 3.1 software so I don't know much about CM 3000. Just would like to know why. EZoto |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|