A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Question about Philip Innes AKA Phil Innes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old March 16th 07, 02:51 PM posted to rec.games.chess.computer,rec.games.chess.misc
Chess One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,003
Default Question about Philip Innes AKA Phil Innes


"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chess One wrote:

a lot of ****, as usual

I hate to break it to you,


On the contrary - you do it because you like to, and its all you have
learned to do, and because its enough for you at your stage of development.

And because you can't talk chess, and because having called everyone else
the same garbage in the Shakespeare newsgroup, not even bigots want to
associate with Trollsby. If you admit you /like to do it/ [not to me, to
yourself], then, as an experiment, see what happens next

But if you are content with the way you are - why protest it so much?

Its difficult with superior beings for them to tell if its everyone else who
is mad or themselves, which is an apparent flaw in the superiority game,
which neverthless everyone else notices but the superior one - casting some
doubt on that approach.

Phil, but you habitually assassinate your
*own* character, not least because of your tendency to avoid the truth,
and, worse, your tendency to behave like a three-year-old.

You give three-year-olds everywhere a bad name. I think that if I were
a three-year-old, and I knew what you were doing, I'd be miffed.


If you were a three year old you would be told to play nice, or sent out
back to play with Jason. And if you were miffed, who would care?

Its not like anyone was missing stimulating conversation on chess or
Shakespeare, and more like someone monkey-wrenched the mullah's loud
speaker, so he was forced out of his tower to mumble with the rest of us in
the dusty streets.

Phil

Have a nice day.



Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interview with CJA Award Winning Historian in The Chess Journalist The Historian rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 215 November 16th 06 08:34 PM
Phil Innes and the "Andean" language Taylor Kingston rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 15 September 27th 06 08:46 AM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 160 January 10th 06 01:25 PM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 163 January 10th 06 01:25 PM
Parr challenges Blair parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 201 January 3rd 06 01:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Mortgages - Credit Cards - Debt Help - Internet Advertising