A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , ,

how to test mp engines within chessbase gui on dual core machines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 22nd 07, 02:40 AM posted to rec.games.chess.computer
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default how to test mp engines within chessbase gui on dual core machines

I have a dual core 4200 and several MP engines, running without the Fritz10
GUI, I was wondering if I wanted to test a MP program such as deep fritz or
loop64:32 would I use ponder on or ponder off? Also if I run two MP engines
against themselves should I turn off ponder or not?
thanks for the help


Ads
  #2  
Old January 22nd 07, 11:02 AM posted to rec.games.chess.computer
Dave (from the UK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 446
Default how to test mp engines within chessbase gui on dual core machines

george wrote:
I have a dual core 4200 and several MP engines, running without the Fritz10
GUI, I was wondering if I wanted to test a MP program such as deep fritz or
loop64:32 would I use ponder on or ponder off?


Depends what you are trying to test.

Also if I run two MP engines
against themselves should I turn off ponder or not?
thanks for the help


From a 'fairness' point of view, it should make no difference - either
ponder on or off (assuming same on each) will give each an even chance.

But you would I suspect get a better game (engines able to find a better
move), by having ponder off. When it is off, the engine on move will
have 100% of the CPU time to think about the move to be played. If
ponder is on, the engine on move has only 50% of the CPU time - the
engine not on move has the other 50%. But it can't put that 50% CPU time
to such effective use as the engine on move, as it will have to consider
all moves the other engine can play. That would limit it to one ply
deeper I suspect.

If I'm playing a game, I get the same time as my opponent. I can think
in his time. But if instead of thinking in my opponents time, I had
twice as long to think on my own move, it would be preferable.

Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games.

I'm no expert though - this just seems intuitive to me.

--
Dave (from the UK)

Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form:
Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually.

http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database
  #3  
Old January 22nd 07, 05:01 PM posted to rec.games.chess.computer
Gian-Carlo Pascutto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default how to test mp engines within chessbase gui on dual core machines

Dave (from the UK) wrote:

Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games.


Not if you're testing 2 single CPU engines on a dual CPU system, then
ponder is fine, since each will get the full CPU power they can use.

But for 2 dual engines on a dual system, it should be off again.

--
GCP
  #4  
Old January 22nd 07, 05:31 PM posted to rec.games.chess.computer
Dave (from the UK)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 446
Default how to test mp engines within chessbase gui on dual core machines

Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
Dave (from the UK) wrote:


Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games.



Not if you're testing 2 single CPU engines on a dual CPU system, then
ponder is fine, since each will get the full CPU power they can use.

But for 2 dual engines on a dual system, it should be off again.


Yes, I forgot to say that. When I play engine vs engine on this machine,
assuming the engines are single threaded, I still leave ponder on as it
has 4 CPUs (rather slow old ones it must be said, but still 4).

--
Dave (from the UK)

Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form:
Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually.

http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
machines, engines, automata, Turing Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod) rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 1 December 22nd 06 01:22 AM
The cheating IBM Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod) rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 148 July 22nd 06 02:52 PM
Fritz 9 & Dual core PCs .. GSV Three Minds in a Can rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) 9 November 5th 05 02:10 PM
ChessCafe blackmailing USCF? parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 165 October 7th 05 08:05 PM
ChessCafe blackmailing USCF? parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 117 October 7th 05 06:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Myspace Proxy - 0 Credit Cards - Mortgage - Repair Bad Credit - American Flags