![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: chessbase, core, dual, engines, gui, machines, test, within |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a dual core 4200 and several MP engines, running without the Fritz10
GUI, I was wondering if I wanted to test a MP program such as deep fritz or loop64:32 would I use ponder on or ponder off? Also if I run two MP engines against themselves should I turn off ponder or not? thanks for the help |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
george wrote:
I have a dual core 4200 and several MP engines, running without the Fritz10 GUI, I was wondering if I wanted to test a MP program such as deep fritz or loop64:32 would I use ponder on or ponder off? Depends what you are trying to test. Also if I run two MP engines against themselves should I turn off ponder or not? thanks for the help From a 'fairness' point of view, it should make no difference - either ponder on or off (assuming same on each) will give each an even chance. But you would I suspect get a better game (engines able to find a better move), by having ponder off. When it is off, the engine on move will have 100% of the CPU time to think about the move to be played. If ponder is on, the engine on move has only 50% of the CPU time - the engine not on move has the other 50%. But it can't put that 50% CPU time to such effective use as the engine on move, as it will have to consider all moves the other engine can play. That would limit it to one ply deeper I suspect. If I'm playing a game, I get the same time as my opponent. I can think in his time. But if instead of thinking in my opponents time, I had twice as long to think on my own move, it would be preferable. Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games. I'm no expert though - this just seems intuitive to me. -- Dave (from the UK) Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam. It is always of the form: Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually. http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave (from the UK) wrote:
Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games. Not if you're testing 2 single CPU engines on a dual CPU system, then ponder is fine, since each will get the full CPU power they can use. But for 2 dual engines on a dual system, it should be off again. -- GCP |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
Dave (from the UK) wrote: Hence I feel ponder should be off in engine vs engine games. Not if you're testing 2 single CPU engines on a dual CPU system, then ponder is fine, since each will get the full CPU power they can use. But for 2 dual engines on a dual system, it should be off again. Yes, I forgot to say that. When I play engine vs engine on this machine, assuming the engines are single threaded, I still leave ponder on as it has 4 CPUs (rather slow old ones it must be said, but still 4). -- Dave (from the UK) Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam. It is always of the form: Hitting reply will work for a few months only - later set it manually. http://chessdb.sourceforge.net/ - a Free open-source Chess Database |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| machines, engines, automata, Turing | Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod) | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | December 22nd 06 01:22 AM |
| The cheating IBM | Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (Wlod) | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 148 | July 22nd 06 02:52 PM |
| Fritz 9 & Dual core PCs .. | GSV Three Minds in a Can | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 9 | November 5th 05 02:10 PM |
| ChessCafe blackmailing USCF? | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 165 | October 7th 05 08:05 PM |
| ChessCafe blackmailing USCF? | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 117 | October 7th 05 06:04 PM |