Post #75595 refers to my statement, "I think you guys are really
stupid", which was in response to the motion that was one vote away
from passing that the US Championship tournament be canceled and
replaced with a match between the champion and a challenger.

That was not a false statement. It was a true statement. They were
stupid. The USCF was formed in 1939 for the purpose of holding a US
Championship tournament, as opposed to the previous practice of
determining the championship by a match between the champion and a
challenger.

Abolishing the US Championship tournament would probably have required
a change in the charter. Doing this without a vote by the membership
or the delegates would have caused tremendous outrage. By the way,
Goichberg voted for the motion to abolish the US Championship
tournament, which shows that Goichberg does not have good judgment at
times.

Sam Sloan

The chances of Paul being innocent are so close to zero as to be
infinitesimal. My wife is now taking a course in calculus in college
and is studying limit theory, so I have had to brush up. The line gets
closer and closer to the limit but never quite reaches there.

However, we have to be practical. I am well aware of the risks of
litigation. Judges often do crazy, irrational things, especially when
pro se litigants are involved. Thus, if counsel for the USCF
approaches me with something reasonable, I will certainly consider it.
Meanwhile, I have an idea in my mind of a reasonable offer. However,
so far nobody has contacted me and I doubt that will happen soon.

Sam Sloan

On Oct 29, 8:35 am, samsloan wrote:
The chances of Paul being innocent are so close to zero as to be
infinitesimal. My wife is now taking a course in calculus in college
and is studying limit theory, so I have had to brush up. The line gets
closer and closer to the limit but never quite reaches there.

However, we have to be practical. I am well aware of the risks of
litigation. Judges often do crazy, irrational things, especially when
pro se litigants are involved. Thus, if counsel for the USCF
approaches me with something reasonable, I will certainly consider it.
Meanwhile, I have an idea in my mind of a reasonable offer. However,
so far nobody has contacted me and I doubt that will happen soon.

Sam Sloan

How about a night with a 13-year old virgin?

http://tinyurl.com/3dk5r5

What I have been wondering is, let us say for the sake of argument,
that not only does the supposedly forthcoming report from an as yet
unnamed "expert" find Truong guilty, but Truong is actually arrested,
tried, convicted and sentenced to prison, but still refuses to resign.
What then? How can we kick him out?

Mark Nibbelin, a defender of Truong, tries to compare his case to
mine. The cases are completely different. Millions of people know
about my case. The USCF voters certainly knew about it when they
elected me. My entire website is devoted to it. I have written and
sent thousands of emails about it. I displayed it prominently on the
new blog I started yesterday at http://samsloan.blogspot.com

The 2006 Delegates meeting that voted to require me to publish a
statement about in Chess Life did not realize that I wanted to publish
a statement about it in Chess Life and therefore did not object to it.
Kind of like Burr Rabbit who says, "Please don't throw me into that
briar patch." The motion passed only because Grant Perks got Herbert
Rodney Vaughn, who posts here as Tanstaafl, seated as a delegate from
Ohio, where he has never lived, just to try to overturn the election
results in which I had defeated Grant Perks for election. Vaughn spoke
repeatedly on the motion, tying up the meeting and nobody knew who he
was. The motion passed by one vote, Vaughn's vote. In the two previous
years, 2004 and 2005, a similar motion had been made by Tim Redman and
had failed both times. In 2006, the maker of the original motion was
Howard Cohen (brother of Larry, the infamous arbiter) and he thought
that I had actually been convicted of Child Molestation. When he found
out that the real case against me was a child custody case, he was
appalled and said that he never would have made that motion and never
would have voted for it had he known that.

Sam Sloan

On Oct 29, 3:59 pm, samsloan wrote:

Kind of like Burr Rabbit who says, "Please don't throw me into that
briar patch."

Is "Burr Rabbit" related to Aaron, Raymond, or Eddie?

On Oct 29, 3:02 pm, Taylor Kingston wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:59 pm, samsloan wrote:

Kind of like Burr Rabbit who says, "Please don't throw me into that
briar patch."

Is "Burr Rabbit" related to Aaron, Raymond, or Eddie?

Isn't that a children's book by Gore Vidal?

On Oct 29, 2:59 pm, samsloan wrote:
What I have been wondering is, let us say for the sake of argument,
that not only does the supposedly forthcoming report from an as yet
unnamed "expert" find Truong guilty, but Truong is actually arrested,
tried, convicted and sentenced to prison, but still refuses to resign.
What then? How can we kick him out?

Question: in the Sam Sloan fantasy wherein Paul Truong
is sent to prison, what exactly is the charge which would
warrant a prison sentence (i.e. attempted murder of MR)?



Mark Nibbelin, a defender of Truong, tries to compare his case to
mine. The cases are completely different. Millions of people know
about my case. The USCF voters certainly knew about it when they
elected me. My entire website is devoted to it. I have written and
sent thousands of emails about it. I displayed it prominently on the
new blog I started yesterday athttp://samsloan.blogspot.com

Mr. Sloan is famous the world over. Everyone knows about
him and is concerned with the ups and downs of his latest, um,
activities. (The only reason he has yet to appear on the cover
of Time magazine is that they don;t want to make prior cover
stories look bad in comparison.)


The 2006 Delegates meeting that voted to require me to publish a
statement about in Chess Life did not realize that I wanted to publish
a statement about it in Chess Life and therefore did not object to it.
Kind of like Burr Rabbit who says, "Please don't throw me into that
briar patch."

That was Brer Rabbit. He consistently outsmarted the
likes of Brer Bear, much like Bugs Bunny outsmarted
Porky Pig, the Roadrunner outsmarted Wile E. Coyote
and I have outwitted Sanny's GetClub program (with a
few exceptions).


The motion passed only because Grant Perks got Herbert
Rodney Vaughn, who posts here as Tanstaafl, seated as a delegate from
Ohio, where he has never lived, just to try to overturn the election
results in which I had defeated Grant Perks for election. Vaughn spoke
repeatedly on the motion, tying up the meeting and nobody knew who he
was. The motion passed by one vote, Vaughn's vote. In the two previous
years, 2004 and 2005, a similar motion had been made by Tim Redman and
had failed both times. In 2006, the maker of the original motion was
Howard Cohen (brother of Larry, the infamous arbiter) and he thought
that I had actually been convicted of Child Molestation. When he found
out that the real case against me was a child custody case, he was
appalled and said that he never would have made that motion and never
would have voted for it had he known that.

It looks like the voters in the USCF don't have a clue.
Maybe someone should make a motion to prevent them
from voting on anything ever again.


-- help bot

There is about zero chance that will happen. I am trying to save the
USCF, not destroy it. I have received a tremendous outpouring of
support. I have received letters and telephone calls from all over the
country supporting me. Not one letter or phone call has arrived
disagreeing with what I have come.

The members are fed up. This has been going on for years. The USCF
just keeps sinking lower and lower, getting worse and worse and it is
time somebody tried to do something about it.

You are a new member of the USCF and do not know this history.

Sam Sloan

samsloan wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Payne Sam, Being very serious for a minute. I am sure you realize that the USCF is 86,000(roughly) members, it is not an office in Tenn. nor is it the EB volunteers. I am hoping you will see the need to drop the USCF from your lawsuit. If Brian M's facts are correct, you have a good suit there, collect what you can fom those that caused you the biggest problem. It was not me, nor was it the majority of the other 85,999(roughly) members but it will hurt those members the most. As a member I thank you.

There is about zero chance that will happen. I am trying to save the
USCF, not destroy it. I have received a tremendous outpouring of
support. I have received letters and telephone calls from all over the
country supporting me. Not one letter or phone call has arrived
disagreeing with what I have come.

The members are fed up. This has been going on for years. The USCF
just keeps sinking lower and lower, getting worse and worse and it is
time somebody tried to do something about it.

You are a new member of the USCF and do not know this history.

Sam Sloan

Sam, the members resoundingly rejected you in the last election. You
received about half as many votes as in the previous election, despite
a larger turnout. Are you really arguing with a straight face that
some scurrilous postings on rgcp -- read by a mere handful, many of
them not USCF members -- accounted for the difference? If anything,
those posts got you a few sympathy votes. You were rejected by the
voters because of your disastrous performance on the Board.

"Not one letter or phone call has arrived disagreeing with what I have
come (sic)." Why would the vast majority, who long ago gave up on you
as a litigious loon, bother calling you? You're obviously a lost
cause. Only your tens of followers would waste time speaking to you.

Settlement negotiations are off for the time being, as real attorneys
have just appeared in the case.

Sam Sloan