A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

can computer kick human ass in music as in chess?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 04, 09:29 PM
my pet goat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default can computer kick human ass in music as in chess?

deep blue kicked human ass in chess.

can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any
human?

i guess it can electronically.

but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly
or better than a human?

i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing.
Ads
  #2  
Old August 20th 04, 09:48 PM
Samuel Vriezen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

my pet goat wrote:

but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly
or better than a human?


You don't even need a computer. Machines have been excellent musicians
even before the invention of the pianola.

i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing.


I think a robot conductor is going to have a big problem keeping the
orchestra under control.

--
samuel
concerten.free.fr
http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm
  #3  
Old August 20th 04, 10:15 PM
Dr.Matt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Samuel Vriezen sqv.do.not.spam@xs4all wrote:
my pet goat wrote:

but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly
or better than a human?


You don't even need a computer. Machines have been excellent musicians
even before the invention of the pianola.

i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing.


I think a robot conductor is going to have a big problem keeping the
orchestra under control.


Depends on the orchestra. We do coordinated locks on databases all
the time, so having a central timeserver issuing timecodes to multiple
devices while operating an output-mixer is straightforward.

--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
A genuine countertenor voice silences all arguments. --Salman Rushdie
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
  #4  
Old August 21st 04, 05:45 AM
fs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"my pet goat" wrote in message
om...
deep blue kicked human ass in chess.

can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any
human?

i guess it can electronically.

but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly
or better than a human?

i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing.


In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex
scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is
generally not considered a competition, so I would not say the computer
would "kick human ass." Besides, the small rhythmic, volume, and pitch
"flaws" in the performance is how the human performer communicates emotion.


  #5  
Old August 21st 04, 06:17 AM
Ryan Tanaka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which
are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and
possible moves.

Ryan

--
http://www.ryangtanaka.com
  #6  
Old August 21st 04, 07:46 AM
John Rowland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message
om...

All forms of computer programs operate under
finite algorhythms which are only useful for games
like chess that have limited outcomes and
possible moves.


But our brains are computers...

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes


  #7  
Old August 21st 04, 12:39 PM
Gareth Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 07:46:25 +0100, John Rowland wrote:

"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message
om...

All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which
are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and
possible moves.


But our brains are computers...


Arguably, but if they are, they're far more adaptable than "robotic"
computers. They are also self-learning across at least five senses - six
if you include introspection or self-awareness.

The human brain can handle far more bits of information simultaneously
than even the largest supercomputers. The theoretical processing power of
a single human brain is around 100 trillion floating point operations per
second (100 Teraflops). The fastest computer in the world can only manage
a theoretical maximum of around 35 Teraflops.

Even assuming that one could develop a computer with the intuition,
imagination and "free will" sufficient to compose and perform idiomatic
music of any quality, the costs would be huge. Without a supercomputer to
hand you could concoct an array of standard Pentiums, but you'd fill a
large concert hall with the tens of thousands of PCs required, the power
bills would be astronomic and the only fans you'd find in the audience
would be of the cooling variety.

--

Regards, Gareth Williams

  #8  
Old August 21st 04, 12:54 PM
Ron Hardin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fs wrote:
In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex
scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is


There's a built-in limit to speed because pitch becomes indefinite as the
note becomes shorter.

--
Ron Hardin


On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
  #9  
Old August 21st 04, 01:50 PM
Samuel Vriezen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fs wrote:
"my pet goat" wrote in message
om...

deep blue kicked human ass in chess.

can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any
human?

i guess it can electronically.

but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly
or better than a human?

i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing.



In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex
scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is
generally not considered a competition,


Except bravoura virtuoso competitions. One may of course question what
those have to do with music.

so I would not say the computer
would "kick human ass." Besides, the small rhythmic, volume, and pitch
"flaws" in the performance is how the human performer communicates emotion.


What makes you think a robot could not be programmed to have 'flaws'
like those?

--
samuel
concerten.free.fr
http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm
  #10  
Old August 21st 04, 01:54 PM
Samuel Vriezen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Rowland wrote:

"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message
om...

All forms of computer programs operate under
finite algorhythms which are only useful for games
like chess that have limited outcomes and
possible moves.



But our brains are computers...


In fact, the entire universe is a computer. Atoms are data, the laws of
physics are the program manipulating it. And God was an expert
programmer. Therefore, probably the manna from heaven was rich in grease
and caffeine.

--
samuel
concerten.free.fr
http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] pribut@yahoo.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 June 28th 04 07:43 PM
Staunton's rich and varied past John Townsend rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 15 May 24th 04 03:51 AM
Lev Khariton: With Love and Bitterness Aryeh Davidoff rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 2 May 6th 04 05:56 PM
rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] pribut@yahoo.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 May 4th 04 01:59 PM
rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] pribut@yahoo.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 0 March 19th 04 09:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Remortgages - Web Advertising - Share Dealing - Boston Moving Company - Proxy