![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: ass, chess, computer, human, kick, music |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
deep blue kicked human ass in chess.
can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any human? i guess it can electronically. but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly or better than a human? i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
my pet goat wrote:
but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly or better than a human? You don't even need a computer. Machines have been excellent musicians even before the invention of the pianola. i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing. I think a robot conductor is going to have a big problem keeping the orchestra under control. -- samuel concerten.free.fr http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Samuel Vriezen sqv.do.not.spam@xs4all wrote: my pet goat wrote: but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly or better than a human? You don't even need a computer. Machines have been excellent musicians even before the invention of the pianola. i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing. I think a robot conductor is going to have a big problem keeping the orchestra under control. Depends on the orchestra. We do coordinated locks on databases all the time, so having a central timeserver issuing timecodes to multiple devices while operating an output-mixer is straightforward. -- Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields Music: Splendor in Sound A genuine countertenor voice silences all arguments. --Salman Rushdie Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"my pet goat" wrote in message om... deep blue kicked human ass in chess. can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any human? i guess it can electronically. but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly or better than a human? i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing. In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is generally not considered a competition, so I would not say the computer would "kick human ass." Besides, the small rhythmic, volume, and pitch "flaws" in the performance is how the human performer communicates emotion. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which
are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and possible moves. Ryan -- http://www.ryangtanaka.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message
om... All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and possible moves. But our brains are computers... -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 07:46:25 +0100, John Rowland wrote:
"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message om... All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and possible moves. But our brains are computers... Arguably, but if they are, they're far more adaptable than "robotic" computers. They are also self-learning across at least five senses - six if you include introspection or self-awareness. The human brain can handle far more bits of information simultaneously than even the largest supercomputers. The theoretical processing power of a single human brain is around 100 trillion floating point operations per second (100 Teraflops). The fastest computer in the world can only manage a theoretical maximum of around 35 Teraflops. Even assuming that one could develop a computer with the intuition, imagination and "free will" sufficient to compose and perform idiomatic music of any quality, the costs would be huge. Without a supercomputer to hand you could concoct an array of standard Pentiums, but you'd fill a large concert hall with the tens of thousands of PCs required, the power bills would be astronomic and the only fans you'd find in the audience would be of the cooling variety. -- Regards, Gareth Williams |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
fs wrote:
In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is There's a built-in limit to speed because pitch becomes indefinite as the note becomes shorter. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
fs wrote:
"my pet goat" wrote in message om... deep blue kicked human ass in chess. can a computer be programmed to produce music more perfectly than any human? i guess it can electronically. but how about physically? can a computerized robot play as perfectly or better than a human? i'll bet robot conducting would be easier than robot playing. In certain things, yes. For example, a computer/robot could play complex scales faster and more accurately than any human ever could. But music is generally not considered a competition, Except bravoura virtuoso competitions. One may of course question what those have to do with music. so I would not say the computer would "kick human ass." Besides, the small rhythmic, volume, and pitch "flaws" in the performance is how the human performer communicates emotion. What makes you think a robot could not be programmed to have 'flaws' like those? -- samuel concerten.free.fr http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Rowland wrote:
"Ryan Tanaka" wrote in message om... All forms of computer programs operate under finite algorhythms which are only useful for games like chess that have limited outcomes and possible moves. But our brains are computers... In fact, the entire universe is a computer. Atoms are data, the laws of physics are the program manipulating it. And God was an expert programmer. Therefore, probably the manna from heaven was rich in grease and caffeine. -- samuel concerten.free.fr http://composers21.com/compdocs/vriezens.htm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | June 28th 04 07:43 PM |
| Staunton's rich and varied past | John Townsend | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 15 | May 24th 04 03:51 AM |
| Lev Khariton: With Love and Bitterness | Aryeh Davidoff | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | May 6th 04 05:56 PM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | May 4th 04 01:59 PM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 19th 04 09:36 AM |