![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: gik, journalist, khariton, lev, turncoat, yevgeni |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka".
BTW Todd you are topposting and in general you idolize Fischer You make me laugh! You know Russian, so come here http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 and say that you were called a friend of "imaginary" Dunka Kulakova" but don't know what it means. They tell you. ![]() and attack Russians who dare to object your opinions. :P Until now I don't "see" any Russian or or non-Russian in this thread who "dares" to "object" my "opinions". |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Todd E. Flambers" wrote in message
om... No, I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". You make me laugh! You know Russian, so come here http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 and say that you were called a friend of "imaginary" Dunka Kulakova" but don't know what it means. They tell you. ![]() Thus you admit that I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". Funny, previously you made an assumption that I was. Until now I don't "see" any Russian or or non-Russian in this thread who "dares" to "object" my "opinions". You seem to forget Russian Gik. You liked to distort his name and to write "Geek". Don`t you remember ? I`m afraid that you must be a geek yourself (a geek = a person with an unusual or odd personality ) :P Regards, Jerzy |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Todd E. Flambers wrote:
No, I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". BTW Todd you are topposting and in general you idolize Fischer You make me laugh! You know Russian, so come here http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 and say that you were called a friend of "imaginary" Dunka Kulakova" but don't know what it means. They tell you. ![]() and attack Russians who dare to object your opinions. :P Until now I don't "see" any Russian or or non-Russian in this thread who "dares" to "object" my "opinions". Obviously you don't understand both the contents and the cyberpunk undercultural background of the site you quoted otherwise you wouldn't. Probably you're a friend of Lena Golovach. -- Roman M. Parparov - NASA EOSDIS project node at TAU technical manager. Email: http://www.nasa.proj.ac.il/ Phone/Fax: +972-(0)3-6405205 (work), +972-(0)51-34-18-34 (home) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The economy depends about as much on economists as the weather does on weather forecasters. -- Jean-Paul Kauffmann |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jerzy" wrote in message ...
Thus you admit that I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". Funny, previously you made an assumption that I was. Did you "forget" how to "read" or just have a poor eyesight? All I "admit" that you don't know the meaning of expression "Dunka Kulakova" and "advised" you to "ask" Russians from http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 for explanation. Or are you a chicken, scared to ask those good guys "about" it, eh??? You seem to forget Russian Gik. If I "forgot" "Russian" "Gik", I would read his "articles". But I "remember" that "Gik" is a lousy "journalist" and "reading" his "articles" is a waste of time. So I won't even "read" the article Khariton reacted on so passionately and I think that it does not deserve much attention. What is so wrong about it? Not all good chessmasters are good journalists. You liked to distort his name and to write "Geek". Don`t you remember ? On the contrary, I "remember" that you simply don't know English "phonetics". As well as "Gik" who does not even know how to write his name in English in a proper way. It is "Gik" that distorts the English spelling of his name. I`m afraid that you must be a geek yourself (a geek = a person with an unusual or odd personality ) :P Yes, that is yer typical and primitive "way" of discussion: the lack of arguments, total incapability to get a clue, listening to yerself only and giving labels. I am afraid that must be all you are "capable" of! ![]() Regards, Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Look around, Bolgarin Khuev, Golovach Lena is in already yer Tahat! :P
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jerzy" wrote in message ...
Thus you admit that I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". Funny, previously you made an assumption that I was. Did you "forget" how to "read" or just have a poor eyesight? All I "admit" that you don't know the meaning of expression "Dunka Kulakova" and "advised" you to "ask" Russians from http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 for explanation. Or are you a chicken, scared to ask those good guys "about" it, eh??? You seem to forget Russian Gik. If I "forgot" "Russian" "Gik", I would read his "articles". But I "remember" that "Gik" is a lousy "journalist" and "reading" his "articles" is a waste of time. So I won't even "read" the article Khariton reacted on so passionately and I think that it does not deserve much attention. What is so wrong about it? Not all good chessmasters are good journalists. You liked to distort his name and to write "Geek". Don`t you remember ? On the contrary, I "remember" that you simply don't know English "phonetics". As well as "Gik" who does not even know how to write his name in English in a proper way. It is "Gik" that distorts the English spelling of his name. I`m afraid that you must be a geek yourself (a geek = a person with an unusual or odd personality ) :P Yes, that is yer typical and primitive "way" of discussion: the lack of arguments, total incapability to get a clue, listening to yerself only and giving labels. I am afraid that must be all you are "capable" of! ![]() Regards, Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Todd E. Flambers" wrote in message
om... Thus you admit that I`m not a friend of your imaginary "Dunka". Funny, previously you made an assumption that I was. Did you "forget" how to "read" or just have a poor eyesight? All I "admit" that you don't know the meaning of expression "Dunka Kulakova" and "advised" you to "ask" Russians from http://rizh.fastbb.ru/?-0 for explanation. Or are you a chicken, scared to ask those good guys "about" it, eh??? So you admit that "Dunka" is an imaginary name ? Man, give it a break, I don`t know any "Dunka" :P You seem to forget Russian Gik. If I "forgot" "Russian" "Gik", I would read his "articles". But I "remember" that "Gik" is a lousy "journalist" and "reading" his "articles" is a waste of time. So I won't even "read" the article Khariton reacted on so passionately and I think that it does not deserve much attention. Well, in my opinion it is you who are reacting very passionately. Posting twice the same message is a clear sign of your emotions ![]() What is so wrong about it? Not all good chessmasters are good journalists. I see that we have to disagree. Gik wrote several good chess books and some people can`t forgive him that especially because he wrote them in cooperation with Karpov. Also he is an interesting chess journalist contrary to your writings here that are merely personal attacks on Gik. Unfortunately into the same category can be included Lev Khariton`s article. You liked to distort his name and to write "Geek". Don`t you remember ? On the contrary, I "remember" that you simply don't know English "phonetics". As well as "Gik" who does not even know how to write his name in English in a proper way. It is "Gik" that distorts the English spelling of his name. Following your reasoning you should write Fisher not Fischer. It would be more phonetical. Maybe more American but not more correct :-) Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick Poruchick ... another definition of a geek ? :-) Regards, Jerzy (George) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
So you admit that "Dunka" is an imaginary name ? Man, give it a break, I
don`t know any "Dunka" :P Come on, tell it to yer Granny. You know very well what I mean and you admit that you are a friend of Dunka Kulakova, that is why you got so mad and have to put smilies almost after each sentence of yer post to hide it. Well, in my opinion it is you who are reacting very passionately. Posting twice the same message is a clear sign of your emotions ![]() This remark one more time proves that primitive attacks instead of real arguments is all you are capable of. Now I see that Peter van der Hoog was right regarding you! I see that we have to disagree. Gik wrote several good chess books and some people can`t forgive him that especially because he wrote them in cooperation with Karpov. Maybe he wrote "several good chess books"(according to Khariton was a ghostwriter for Karpov), but this is not the subject here. Also he is an interesting chess journalist From a few articles I read it became clear, that "Gik" writes very poor, incomparable with, say, Rene Chun or Larry Parr. contrary to your writings here that are merely personal attacks on Gik. Distortion: I am not a journalist, I just express my opinion in rgcm and don't write lousy articles for money. Gik does it. Following your reasoning you should write Fisher not Fischer. It would be more phonetical. Maybe more American but not more correct :-) One more distortion: The name "Fischer" is written in the American birth certificate and "Gik" is just a wrong transliteration from Russian. Poruchick ... another definition of a geek ? :-) One more reaction like above and I will think that another definition of ignoramus is jerzy. ![]() Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Todd E. Flambers" wrote in message
om... So you admit that "Dunka" is an imaginary name ? Man, give it a break, I don`t know any "Dunka" :P Come on, tell it to yer Granny. You know very well what I mean and you admit that you are a friend of Dunka Kulakova, that is why you got so mad and have to put smilies almost after each sentence of yer post to hide it. Oh, man you are starting it over and over again... :P Well, in my opinion it is you who are reacting very passionately. Posting twice the same message is a clear sign of your emotions ![]() This remark one more time proves that primitive attacks instead of real arguments is all you are capable of. Now I see that Peter van der Hoog was right regarding you! Oh, man take it easy, don`t be so emotional and personal. :P Maybe he wrote "several good chess books"(according to Khariton was a ghostwriter for Karpov), but this is not the subject here. Why not ? You are attacking him, depriving him almost of human dignity and I want to point out that you are wrong. He is better than you not only as a chess player or chess writer but also as a decent man. Also he is an interesting chess journalist From a few articles I read it became clear, that "Gik" writes very poor, incomparable with, say, Rene Chun or Larry Parr. I remember Larry Parr was named Liary Parr many times here but I admit that he is better than that. The same is with Gik. Although he doesn`t write here, so not everyone can read his articles, some of his articles are really good for example I like his article on "political chess", have you read it ? contrary to your writings here that are merely personal attacks on Gik. Distortion: I am not a journalist, I just express my opinion in rgcm and don't write lousy articles for money. Gik does it. You make lousy personal attacks on Gik and that`s enough for me to understand that you are not objective Following your reasoning you should write Fisher not Fischer. It would be more phonetical. Maybe more American but not more correct :-) One more distortion: The name "Fischer" is written in the American birth certificate and "Gik" is just a wrong transliteration from Russian. Wrong again, Gik is the official transliteration of his name. But no doubt that you have a sheer joy in distorting his name :-) Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick So maybe Poru-chick is a derivative from a chicken ? :-) Regards, Jerzy |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jerzy" wrote in message
Oh, man take it easy, don`t be so emotional and personal. :P You are talking to yerself, eh? Why not ? Read the head of the topic: "Lev Khariton: Yevgeni Gik, A Turncoat Of A Journalist". snipped yer pathetic stuff You make lousy personal attacks on Gik and that`s enough for me to understand that you are not objective That is life: When somebody writes stupid articles for money he does deserve rotten tomatoes instead of marzipans. Wrong again, Gik is the official transliteration of his name. But no doubt that you have a sheer joy in distorting his name :-) The official transliteration was made from his own words, so "Gik" distorted his name(or a pseudonym) himself. So maybe Poru-chick is a derivative from a chicken ? :-) You mean that Jer-zy is a derivative from a jerk-off? Orrriginally! "Jerzy" wrote in message ... "Todd E. Flambers" wrote in message om... So you admit that "Dunka" is an imaginary name ? Man, give it a break, I don`t know any "Dunka" :P Come on, tell it to yer Granny. You know very well what I mean and you admit that you are a friend of Dunka Kulakova, that is why you got so mad and have to put smilies almost after each sentence of yer post to hide it. Oh, man you are starting it over and over again... :P Well, in my opinion it is you who are reacting very passionately. Posting twice the same message is a clear sign of your emotions ![]() This remark one more time proves that primitive attacks instead of real arguments is all you are capable of. Now I see that Peter van der Hoog was right regarding you! Oh, man take it easy, don`t be so emotional and personal. :P Maybe he wrote "several good chess books"(according to Khariton was a ghostwriter for Karpov), but this is not the subject here. Why not ? You are attacking him, depriving him almost of human dignity and I want to point out that you are wrong. He is better than you not only as a chess player or chess writer but also as a decent man. Also he is an interesting chess journalist From a few articles I read it became clear, that "Gik" writes very poor, incomparable with, say, Rene Chun or Larry Parr. I remember Larry Parr was named Liary Parr many times here but I admit that he is better than that. The same is with Gik. Although he doesn`t write here, so not everyone can read his articles, some of his articles are really good for example I like his article on "political chess", have you read it ? contrary to your writings here that are merely personal attacks on Gik. Distortion: I am not a journalist, I just express my opinion in rgcm and don't write lousy articles for money. Gik does it. You make lousy personal attacks on Gik and that`s enough for me to understand that you are not objective Following your reasoning you should write Fisher not Fischer. It would be more phonetical. Maybe more American but not more correct :-) One more distortion: The name "Fischer" is written in the American birth certificate and "Gik" is just a wrong transliteration from Russian. Wrong again, Gik is the official transliteration of his name. But no doubt that you have a sheer joy in distorting his name :-) Todd E. Flambers aka Poruchick So maybe Poru-chick is a derivative from a chicken ? :-) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lev Khariton: Kasparov Misses the Historical Chance on a Silver Platter | Aryeh Davidoff | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 9 | December 26th 04 05:10 PM |
| Sam Sloan "American chess journalist" | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 7 | December 22nd 03 11:35 PM |
| Lev Khariton's Interview | Aryeh Davidoff | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | October 31st 03 04:36 AM |
| September 5th, 2003 - 200 Words by Lev Khariton | tomic | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 3 | September 8th 03 10:56 PM |
| September 5th, 2003 - 200 Words by Lev Khariton | tomic | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | September 8th 03 08:49 PM |