Proposition posted by Jerry W:
"Can anyone tell me, is there a forum, website or newsgroup anywhere where
the USCF issues are actually debated?

Everybody here seems to be either vindictive, a lunatic, a foul-mouthed
obsessive or a combination of the three..."

Evidence posted by Frank's Steins:
THE USCF is not just financially bankrupt, but morally bankrupt also. A
bunch of Lesbians are running it.

Jerry,
Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to personal
attacks and ill intentions.

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/USCF-Chess

Rob

Jerry W wrote:
"Tom Klem" wrote in message
news:10Pvd.34335$ve.31951@fed1read06...

"Sam Sloan" wrote in message
...
On 03 Feb 2003 16:53:37 GMT, (ASCACHESS) wrote:


In the beginning of the year 2000, the USCF settled the case.
In
protest for
this decision, I resigned to the position of USCF Scholastic
Director.

I would suggest that in the future you use someone else in you
case
against
Mrs. Jarecki. In my view, this situation is history. A long
time ago,
I
moved
on to better things.


Cordially,

WIM Beatriz Marinello


Beatriz,
What were you protesting?

Were you protesting the two conflicting financials of 7/20/99
which had
your
name on them that were produced as evidence by USCF's attorneys?

Were you protesting the John L White report which was hidden by
the
administration and which reported that no one in the office had
done
ANY
tournament financials during 1999 and that "no one seemed to
care".
The
report
didn't pull any punches. It said this in so many words.
Why did the subsequent audit agree with the conclusion of the
John L
White
report?

You brought this subject up or I would have let it go, but I
won't
allow
you to
lie.

This is where Beatriz goes bye-bye. She can't answer.
Tell us Beatriz, how did you report all the entries received by
the
office and
paid by credit card?
Where did you get or not get those numbers?

The fact is you didn't do any financials and consequently
underreported
tournament income received by the office by as much as $20,000.

Did Cavallo order this?
Did Schultz?
Who xeroxed my name on the second contract? How did it get
datestamped
in the
office?
In December 1999, you claimed you had never seen the second
(xerox)
contract
produced in discovery by USCF's attorneys when Bob Smith showed
it to
you
in
Louisville.

You should have known that Schlutz would never really back you.
You made a mistake in choosing your friends.

Richard Peterson

I just came across this old posting from Feburary, 2003. In it,
Beatriz Marinello says that she resigned as USCF Scholastic
Director
in protest of the decision to settle the suit by the USCF against
Richard Peterson.

At that time, I was defending Beatriz from attacks by Peterson.
Perhaps it is time to take another look at this situation.

Sam Sloan

I thought it was a "leopard changing his spots", not a rat jumping
to
another ship.

Perhaps it's time you took a look at what you did in Nevada.

While I agree with Richard Peterson completely about the likely
forger, he
had proof. You never have. You just make it up as you ooze along.


--
Tom Klem

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------

Can anyone tell me, is there a forum, website or newsgroup anywhere
where
the USCF issues are actually debated?

Everybody here seems to be either vindictive, a lunatic, a
foul-mouthed
obsessive or a combination of the three...

It seems a very poor advertisement for for the USCF, for chess, and
for the
USA.

J

"Rob" Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to personal
attacks and ill intentions.

You and Sam Sloan are the only ones posting there. You seem to enjoy the
sound of yourself. Probably how you prefer making love also. Sam, he just
likes to watch. A chess-list of just you and Sam Sloan is like some kind of
"Waiting For Godot" on the e-list format.

John,
It is a new newsgroup. Most of the posts will initially be from the
moderator. The majority of the posts are relevant "on topic" threads
pulled from this newsgroup. They were selected for the quality of
information that thread possesed. Since I forwarded the message, it
will appear as if I was the poster. I invite you to read the threads
and then make a determination on if you should choose to participate.
If your comments are worthy of posting they will remain. Like we say
down South, "don't salt your gravy till you've had a mouthful or two".

Regards,
Rob
John's Beans wrote:
"Rob" Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to
personal
attacks and ill intentions.

You and Sam Sloan are the only ones posting there. You seem to enjoy
the
sound of yourself. Probably how you prefer making love also. Sam, he
just
likes to watch. A chess-list of just you and Sam Sloan is like some
kind of
"Waiting For Godot" on the e-list format.

Hey guys,
Here's my new address:Todd Ullum 5963 Whitefield Street
Dearborn Heights, Michigan 48127

Hey guys,
Here's my new address:Todd Ullum 5963 Whitefield Street
Dearborn Heights, Michigan 48127

John's Beans wrote:
Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to personal
attacks and ill intentions.

The only ones posting thereseem to enjoy the
yourself.

Thanks,
John

Rob

John's Beans wrote:
Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to personal
attacks and ill intentions.

You seem to enjoy
yourself. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/USCF-Chess
Thanks
John!

Rob

"Rob" Try this site. Thanks
John!

So why are you still here? Hasn't your dyke Boss given you permission to
stop monitoring this ng? How much is she paying you? What a coincidence that
you are some unemployed slob looking for work in Tennessee when the USCF is
moving to your town.

Rob wrote:
John's Beans wrote:
Try this site. It is new and as of yet, not inclined to personal
attacks and ill intentions.

You seem to enjoy
yourself. http://groups-beta.google.com/group/USCF-Chess
Thanks
John!

Rob