![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: checkmate, draw, etc, insufficient, material |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
One way a draw can result is if no series of legal moves could result
in checkmate. Usually that means insufficient material to mate, but is it possible to have a position which has sufficient pieces, but they are permanently blocked so no checkmate is possible? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe Bishops of opposite color each protecting a pawn or two on squares of
their own color. "Jud McCranie" wrote in message ... One way a draw can result is if no series of legal moves could result in checkmate. Usually that means insufficient material to mate, but is it possible to have a position which has sufficient pieces, but they are permanently blocked so no checkmate is possible? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jud McCranie wrote:
One way a draw can result is if no series of legal moves could result in checkmate. Usually that means insufficient material to mate, but is it possible to have a position which has sufficient pieces, but they are permanently blocked so no checkmate is possible? 4k3 8 8 8 p1p3p1 PpPp1pPp 1P1P1P1P 1NB1K3 -- Ken Blake Please reply to the newsgroup |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 16 Feb 2006 00:03:05 GMT, CeeBee
wrote: Stalemate. I mean a position that is not stalemate, but at least one side has sufficient mating material, but checkmate is impossible. --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jud McCranie wrote:
One way a draw can result is if no series of legal moves could result in checkmate. Usually that means insufficient material to mate, but is it possible to have a position which has sufficient pieces, but they are permanently blocked so no checkmate is possible? Yes, if the pawns are blocking each other, so that no one can move and the kings can not reach an opposite pawn. Greetings, Ralf |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"John J." wrote: Maybe Bishops of opposite color each protecting a pawn or two on squares of their own color. But there's certainly a sequence of legal moves here which would give checkmate: one side lets the other side's king gobble up the pawns and the bishop. --Harold Buck "Hubris always wins in the end. The Greeks taught us that." -Homer J. Simpson |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:40:53 +0100, Ralf Callenberg
wrote: Yes, if the pawns are blocking each other, so that no one can move and the kings can not reach an opposite pawn. OK, so white pawns at a4, b5, c4, d5, etc; black pawns opposite them, each king behind its own pawns. Thanks! --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Ralf Callenberg wrote: Jud McCranie wrote: One way a draw can result is if no series of legal moves could result in checkmate. Usually that means insufficient material to mate, but is it possible to have a position which has sufficient pieces, but they are permanently blocked so no checkmate is possible? Yes, if the pawns are blocking each other, so that no one can move and the kings can not reach an opposite pawn. Ah, so if you have an interlocked chain of pawns across the board and the kings can't cross over. Good point! --Harold Buck "Hubris always wins in the end. The Greeks taught us that." -Homer J. Simpson |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Jud McCranie wrote: On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:40:53 +0100, Ralf Callenberg wrote: Yes, if the pawns are blocking each other, so that no one can move and the kings can not reach an opposite pawn. OK, so white pawns at a4, b5, c4, d5, etc; black pawns opposite them, each king behind its own pawns. Thanks! --- Actually, no, because there's still a legal sequence of moves that leads to mate (one of the kings could go run to the other side of the board). Of course, there is no *forced* mate. --Harold Buck "Hubris always wins in the end. The Greeks taught us that." -Homer J. Simpson |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:22:25 -0600, Harold Buck
wrote: OK, so white pawns at a4, b5, c4, d5, etc; black pawns opposite them, each king behind its own pawns. Thanks! --- Actually, no, because there's still a legal sequence of moves that leads to mate (one of the kings could go run to the other side of the board). Of course, there is no *forced* mate. I said "etc", so what if white pawns are on a4, b5, c4, d5, e4, f5, g4, and h5. Black pawns are on 15, b4, c5, d4, e5, f4, g5, h4. White king on e1 black king on e8? Or you could leave off the rook pawns, or any file as long as there are blocked pawns in the right place on either side, such as white pawns on a4, c4, e4, g4; black pawns on a5, c5, e5, g5; kings as before. --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Claiming a draw in time trouble? | Neil Coward | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 93 | January 27th 06 04:58 PM |
| Name three possible endings to a chessgame | Ray Gordon | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 39 | January 24th 06 10:45 PM |
| More about material unbalance | Antonio Torrecillas | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | January 6th 06 05:39 PM |
| BAP | David Kane | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 135 | December 24th 05 08:39 PM |
| Won position or Draw? | Michael951 | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 4 | November 16th 05 06:34 PM |