ANOTHER LOST MEMBER

Max Burkett

He hasn't been a member since 1996-06-30.

- Tom Martinak

Larry Parr wrote (8 May 2006 07:57:04 -0700):

EXCUSE ME?
...
Where is there any reference that jr replied to Louie's
post?

_
Recorded by Google.
_
Notice the line that begins: "In-Reply-To"
_
.com
was one of my notes.
_
Now why would Larry Parr be so interested?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "jr"
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: Keene reviews Kingston
Date: 1 May 2006 00:41:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: .com
References: . com
.com
.com
. com
.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.66
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1146469291 22997 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2006
07:41:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: .com
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 7.0; Windows
NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [ntc-tb012 8.4.0], HTTP/1.0
cache-ntc-ab02.proxy.aol.com[CFC87442] (Traffic-Server/5.4.3 [uScM])
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=207.200.116.66;
posting-account=ng29Qg0AAABmynp-nsX4E-K-5PbtpMuQ

GM Keene: "Casting pearls before swine" is the expression that comes to
mind.

When Kingston returns (and he will) you can expect more abuse.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

jr wrote (8 May 2006 11:33:49 -0700):

It's hard to believe that any intelligent person -- and Martinek
appears to be one -- can still accord the nutty professor any
credibility. If Blair did indeed write that I responded to his post
it's AN OUTRIGHT LIE.

_
Notice the line that begins: "In-Reply-To"
_
.com
was one of my notes.
_
By the way, does jr have anything to say about his Laurie
notes?
_
"Larry, please tell us more about playwright
Richard Laurie. IT'S ALL NEW TO ME and
sounds like another juicy scandal. Why did
truth-seeker Kingston ask Laurie to keep their
correspondence secret?" - jr (2 Apr 2006
09:20:05 -0700) (Emphasis added.)
_
"I have read Richard Laurie's
exchanges with Kingston who
secretly tried to get him to
retract an item Laurie submitted
to Chess Life." - jr (8 Jan 2006
12:21:20 -0800)
_
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "jr"
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: Keene reviews Kingston
Date: 1 May 2006 00:41:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: .com
References: . com
.com
.com
. com
.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.66
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1146469291 22997 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2006
07:41:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: .com
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 7.0; Windows
NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [ntc-tb012 8.4.0], HTTP/1.0
cache-ntc-ab02.proxy.aol.com[CFC87442] (Traffic-Server/5.4.3 [uScM])
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=207.200.116.66;
posting-account=ng29Qg0AAABmynp-nsX4E-K-5PbtpMuQ

GM Keene: "Casting pearls before swine" is the expression that comes to
mind.

When Kingston returns (and he will) you can expect more abuse.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

ANOTHER LOST MEMBER

Max Burkett

He hasn't been a member since 1996-06-30. -- Tom Martinak

Apparently Mr. Martinak doesn't count an ex-member who was
about to rejoin but decided not to after learning of the cancellation
of Evans On Chess as a lost member.

Must be the New Math.

ANOTHER LOST MEMBER

Max Burkett

He hasn't been a member since 1996-06-30. -- Tom Martinak

Apparently Mr. Martinak doesn't count an ex-member who was
about to rejoin but decided not to after learning of the cancellation
of Evans On Chess as a lost member.

Must be the New Math.

PARSER HOIST IN HIS OWN RETARD

GM Keene: "Casting pearls before swine" is the expression that comes
to
mind. When Kingston returns (and he will) you can expect more abuse.
-- jr

This was clearly in response to something I wrote, not something
that
Louie wrote. It appears that Louie outgoogled himself.

The parser offers as proof that jr responded to him a phrase that
was
in response to something I wrote. It seems that Louie, who is always
asking others to apologize for something or other, owes jr an apology.

And so it goes.

HE DOESN'T WORK THERE ANYMORE

I am deepy shocked that the letter by Max Burkett to Larry Evans c/o
the
USCF was returned with a note attached saying: "He does not work here
any
more." Have they no decency? -- Sam Sloan on another newsgroup

WHAT YOU WON'T READ IN CHESS LIFE

Letter to the editor

Dear Mr. Lucas:

Some mistakes we are forced to live with; others, fortunately,
are reversible. Therefore I urge you to retain Larry Evans'
column which has been a staple for well over 30 years and
one of my favorites, as well as the columns by Robert Byrne
annd Michael Rohe

Victor Traibush, Boulder Co. 80306
Life Member #10409587

Larry Parr wrote (8 May 2006 14:26:13 -0700):

PARSER HOIST IN HIS OWN RETARD
_
GM Keene: "Casting pearls before swine" is the
expression that comes to mind. When Kingston
returns (and he will) you can expect more abuse.
-- jr
_
This was clearly in response to something I wrote,
not something that Louie wrote. It appears that
Louie outgoogled himself.
_
The parser offers as proof that jr responded to him
a phrase that was in response to something I wrote.

_
Nonsense. Larry Parr snipped the evidence. Here
it is again:
_
Notice the line that begins: "In-Reply-To"
_
.com
was one of my notes.

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "jr"
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc
Subject: Keene reviews Kingston
Date: 1 May 2006 00:41:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: .com
References: . com
.com
.com
. com
.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.200.116.66
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1146469291 22997 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2006
07:41:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: .com
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 7.0; Windows
NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [ntc-tb012 8.4.0], HTTP/1.0
cache-ntc-ab02.proxy.aol.com[CFC87442] (Traffic-Server/5.4.3 [uScM])
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=207.200.116.66;
posting-account=ng29Qg0AAABmynp-nsX4E-K-5PbtpMuQ

GM Keene: "Casting pearls before swine" is the expression that comes to
mind.

When Kingston returns (and he will) you can expect more abuse.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

CAUGHT WITH HER PANTIES DOWN


To repeat: LOUIS BLAIR IS A DOCUMENTED LIAR.

Now, now jr, no need to shout. I know, you've been caught with your
panties down and now your ovaries are in an uproar. No need to feel
embarrassed ... we've known for a while that you're a flat-out liar. Your
lies have been documented on this forum by numerous individuals.
Your credibility on rgcp still remains at zero.

On the other hand, I defy jr to find one (that right, just one) documented
instance of a Blair lie. jr did not supply any reference to a Blair lie. Why not,
you ask? Because she has none.

So now we see the real reason for jr's anonymity. Got nothing to do with
protecting herself from wackos. jr CANNOT TAKE THE FORSENIC HEAT,
as parr would say. jr won't (or cannot) stand behind her own words.

(Of course, there is still a strong chance that parr and jr are one and the same.
The best way to ascertain whether or not they are one and the same is not with
a lie detector test which proves nothing, but subpoena power to have AOL turn
over the computer address of both parr and jr. The latter is unlikely to happen,
so we can never prove that they are the same, but nevertheless, we are entitled
to our opinions .... and the court of public opinion [a court, I might add, that parr
approves of when such court condemns his enemies] believes parr and jr are
one and the same.)