wrote:
Taylor Kingston wrote:

We all are.

Don't tell Phil. Once he learns he may have some Jewish blood in him he
might have to start insulting himself again.

I guess that would be an "I'm not your goy!" thread.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Taylor Kingston wrote:

We all are.

Don't tell Phil. Once he learns he may have some Jewish blood in him he
might have to start insulting himself again.

I mean really! How low can you POSSIBLY get than to write this ****?
Besides, isn't this the coward can't even write his own name since he has
insulted so many people he thinks quite seriously they are out to get him. I
wonder why?

PI

Chess One wrote:

I mean really! How low can you POSSIBLY get than to write this ****?
Besides, isn't this the coward can't even write his own name since he has
insulted so many people he thinks quite seriously they are out to get him. I
wonder why?


There was only one person with such an interest, a certain Moron Tomic.
At the time, my father had just died (although I am sure Parr will
question whether I ever had one), and by finding his obituary on-line,
started pestering my 70+ year-old mother with phone calls.

That was just a bit much for me, Phil. I don't know about you, but it
seemed like an appropriate thing to do at the time. Whether you approve
is really no concern of mine.

I seem to have trouble with only 3 people in the ng at this time, with
the departure of Moron; you, Parr, and "Nick Bourbakis." The same 3
people everyone else has trouble with. I don't think any of you would
be capable of "getting me." Not that the three of you get much else.

wrote in message
ups.com...

Chess One wrote:

I mean really! How low can you POSSIBLY get than to write this ****?
Besides, isn't this the coward can't even write his own name since he has
insulted so many people he thinks quite seriously they are out to get
him. I
wonder why?


There was only one person with such an interest, a certain Moron Tomic.

Ah! Even now you provoke someone. Whatever the merits of the Serbian war,
how intlligent is it to provoke someone who has been bombed by your country?

At the time, my father had just died (although I am sure Parr will
question whether I ever had one), and by finding his obituary on-line,
started pestering my 70+ year-old mother with phone calls.

That was just a bit much for me, Phil. I don't know about you,

I have also had my stalkers, Steve. I should speak some Latin to you in
private, but the last time I did that to a medico was in mid operation, when
being raised to consciousness from the general, I spoke to the surgeon in
Latin. He didn't understand a word, and later admitted to me that he had nev
er studined it, and asked why I addressed him that way. I said it was some
unconscious sense of his due, and from reading far too much Patrick O'Brian.

but it
seemed like an appropriate thing to do at the time. Whether you approve
is really no concern of mine.

If Goran had understood your circumstances, I would hope and would expect
that he would not have plagued you to such an extent - as it was, you did
nothing to reduce tensions, then nor now. When two men provoke each other,
what price humanity?

I seem to have trouble with only 3 people in the ng at this time, with
the departure of Moron; you, Parr, and "Nick Bourbakis." The same 3
people everyone else has trouble with. I don't think any of you would
be capable of "getting me." Not that the three of you get much else.

Be not so parano, brother. Take this as invitation to write about chess, not
about me or you. Otherwise we dig our own graves with our keyboards, no? And
to what effect? Do we illuminate any subject by /only/ regretting those
others who spoke of it, even though they are so evidently daft?

You are neither better nor worse than any one else who does not fulfill
their potential, certainly myself included. This is the human condition -
though if I should only regret you, I am merely a hypocrite, while should I
encourage your more fullsome attention to any and all these matters, then I
avoid becoming a hypocrite [and learn nothing -- joke] but at least have
the opportunity and potential of learning something from you - and if I
seize that opportunity or let it pass is really my soverign choice as an
individual, which I allow myself absolutely, and in similar circumstance, I
so allow you.

Should you not be able to prove me wrong by virtue of my own words here, you
will not have been paying sufficiently deep attention! - but I am not
playing some game of saints, or idiotic wordisms, which would pay you little
respect, even if I won such a game.

I am a Celt, and as our bloody awful famous bard has pronounced, 'A man's a
man, for a' that', which yet contains an egalitarian attitude to being,
which does not permit superior beings, not sub-human ones neither. All such
are always challenged.

Gaeltacht! S. Maturin.

Chess One wrote:

I am a Celt, and as our bloody awful famous bard has pronounced, 'A man's a
man, for a' that', which yet contains an egalitarian attitude to being,
which does not permit superior beings, not sub-human ones neither. All such
are always challenged.


We Celts do fight a lot, don't we Phil?

I BELIEVE HE HAD A FATHER

At the time, my father had just died (although I am sure Parr will
question whether I ever had one), and by finding his obituary on-line,
started pestering my 70+ year-old mother with phone calls. --
Rynd-Dowd

Rynd-Dowd, this time writing in the singular,
tells us that I might question whether he has a
father. Not at all. We may take that as a given.

The remainder of his/her or their claims -- unless
he/she or they further asserts or assert a mother and
grandparents -- one takes with so many grains.

The gent forged my name at a website dealing
with student evaluations of teachers at some university
where I never taught. He now argues that he was, ah,
using my name rather than forging an identity -- a new
distinction that one rather relishes.

Earlier, he spoke of the episode as being less than a
stellar moment in his obsessional life. Yesterday, he
tried to deny an episode for which he earlier expressed
embarrassment. Now, he feels justified.

Once again, I don't know our Rynd-Dowd from
David. I know nothing about his family circumstances.
Nor do I care.

I accept virtually nothing he says based on his word
alone. His obsession with my person and his constant
name-calling speaks for itself.



wrote:
Chess One wrote:

I mean really! How low can you POSSIBLY get than to write this ****?
Besides, isn't this the coward can't even write his own name since he has
insulted so many people he thinks quite seriously they are out to get him. I
wonder why?


There was only one person with such an interest, a certain Moron Tomic.
At the time, my father had just died (although I am sure Parr will
question whether I ever had one), and by finding his obituary on-line,
started pestering my 70+ year-old mother with phone calls.

That was just a bit much for me, Phil. I don't know about you, but it
seemed like an appropriate thing to do at the time. Whether you approve
is really no concern of mine.

I seem to have trouble with only 3 people in the ng at this time, with
the departure of Moron; you, Parr, and "Nick Bourbakis." The same 3
people everyone else has trouble with. I don't think any of you would
be capable of "getting me." Not that the three of you get much else.

wrote:

I accept virtually nothing he says based on his word
alone. His obsession with my person and his constant
name-calling speaks for itself.

Well, well, well.

Keep saying it over and over and over and over again, Larry; at least,
if no one else takes you seriously ( a common occurence here) you can
convince yourself. And your opinion is all that really matters, right?

THIS MAKES NIRO A CHESS CRIMINAL?!

Liarry has a short memory these days. Was it only
three years ago he quoted the following from Chessdon's
website: "Unfortunately his abrupt departure without
consultation with USCF leaders and the simultaneous
discovery of numerous financial problems and unfavorable
USCF contracts will hurt both the USCF and Frank's image." -- The
Historian

Frank Niro is a "criminal" because he wrote some
rotten contracts and made plenty of mistakes? He
might be liable in some civil action, but I see no
evidence that the man in a chess criminal.

Neil Brennen's attack remains unsubstantiated.

We figure it will remain so.

So, for that matter, does Mr. Brennen.

A COMMON OCCURRENCE

Keep saying it over and over and over and over again,
Larry; at least, if no one else takes you seriously ( a
common occurence here) you can convince yourself. -- Rynd Dowd

After a bit of screeching, Rynd-Dowd, currently
still in the singular, appears to be deflating. Less
huff and puff for a change.

As for something or other being a "common
occurence" our self-described medical ethicist gets
it right. It is indeed a common occurrence to
misspell "occurrence."

For some, there will always be lumps of dough in
the intellectual batter -- just as there will be those
uncontrollable obsessional episodes when one must
forge the name of another.


wrote:
wrote:

I accept virtually nothing he says based on his word
alone. His obsession with my person and his constant
name-calling speaks for itself.

Well, well, well.

Keep saying it over and over and over and over again, Larry; at least,
if no one else takes you seriously ( a common occurence here) you can
convince yourself. And your opinion is all that really matters, right?

wrote in message oups.com...
THIS MAKES NIRO A CHESS CRIMINAL?!


Frank Niro is a "criminal" because he wrote some
rotten contracts and made plenty of mistakes? He
might be liable in some civil action, but I see no
evidence that the man in a chess criminal.

Neil Brennen's attack remains unsubstantiated.


Anyone with half a brain can tell than Brennen was expressing an opinion, and
not a point of fact. Heck, even liaring larry knows that, but chooses to make
an issue out a nonissue.

And speaking of unsubstantiated attacks - that comment is extremely hipocritical
coming from the same man who turns a blind eye to Sam Sloan's many
unsubstantiated and unprovoked attacks.