A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Phil Innes Plays Poker



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 25th 06, 12:06 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
g4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 283
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


"Chess One" wrote in message news:EhnHg.876$Bu2.608@trndny02...
no chess in this message, and some whacko who can' write his name continues to offer gratuitous
advice to someone who can


Hey philsy - your message describes you and your slop that you try to pass off
as chess material.


Ads
  #12  
Old August 25th 06, 03:38 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
The Historian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 630
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


g4 wrote:
"Chess One" wrote in message news:EhnHg.876$Bu2.608@trndny02...
no chess in this message, and some whacko who can' write his name continues to offer gratuitous
advice to someone who can


Hey philsy - your message describes you and your slop that you try to pass off
as chess material.


By the way, I've been on the wagon a week. How am I doing?

  #13  
Old August 25th 06, 04:11 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
g4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 283
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker

You're doing fantastic.

Now if we can only help James Rynd who seems to be a hopeless
philaholic.

"The Historian" wrote in message
ups.com...

g4 wrote:
"Chess One" wrote in message news:EhnHg.876$Bu2.608@trndny02...
no chess in this message, and some whacko who can' write his name continues to offer gratuitous
advice to someone who can


Hey philsy - your message describes you and your slop that you try to pass off
as chess material.


By the way, I've been on the wagon a week. How am I doing?



  #14  
Old August 26th 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
The Historian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 630
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


g4 wrote:
You're doing fantastic.

Now if we can only help James Rynd who seems to be a hopeless
philaholic.


Taylor Kingston appears to be addicted as well.

  #15  
Old August 26th 06, 10:28 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,892
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


Taylor Kingston wrote:


At this point, Phil's right hand, seemingly acting on its own, starts
to slide chips into the pot. He looks down and shouts "Get your greasy
fingers off my pile! I'm not your boy!" After his hand puts 2K worth of
chips in, Innes is considered to have called the bet, though he then
claims he did not.


Kingston shows his hand: A-A-A-K-K.
TK: "Full house, bullets backed with cowboys."



The odds of getting such a hand in five card draw are about
the same as the odds of Sanny becomming the next world
chess champion. I say, check up Kingston's sleeves for
hidden cards, and count the deck to make sure it adds up
to 52 cards. And run a background check on the dealer, as
he may be in on the scam.



The group's patience finally exhausted, the dealer picks up Innes'
cards and lays them on the table, showing 3-3-10-6-2.



See? This is more like it. Innes at least does not cheat
by having extra aces/Kings up his sleeve.



PI: "You have snipped my other twelve cards!"

Dealer: "Those are all the cards you were dealt."

PI: "Cheat! You ignore my other cards, just as you ignore your own
complicity in histories written with blood."

Dealer: "You have no other cards. A draw poker hand is five cards.
Period."




Note well how the dealer *always* takes Kingston's side.
Very suspicious, if you ask me.


PI: "And I have five cards. Therefore I win!"

TK: "Jeez Louise, guys, he doesn't even understand the basic rules of
poker."

PI: "Ha! You understand these things only with your head, not your
heart. As Ovid said to Shelly 'Carthago delenda est, hace calor a la
chingada.' When Karpov was caught dealing off the bottom at Hague-Avro
1936 ..."

At this point the poker parlor bouncer comes over and escorts Innes
outside, where he stands on a street corner, telling passers-by what a
great poker player he is, nearly an IM in fact.



IMO, it was most likely Taylor Kingston's constant cheating
(the ridiculously good hands are a dead giveaway) which
ultimately drove Innes batty. I once played a man who tried
to elbow one of my Rooks off the board during a rated blitz
game. What some people won't do to try and win mere money
and rating points -- as if such things even mattered in our
soon-to-be cashless/ratingless society....


-- help bot

  #16  
Old August 26th 06, 11:40 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
Taylor Kingston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,807
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


help bot wrote:
Kingston shows his hand: A-A-A-K-K.
TK: "Full house, bullets backed with cowboys."


The odds of getting such a hand in five card draw are about
the same as the odds of Sanny becomming the next world
chess champion.


No, they're a bit better than that. And when you get the two pair on
the first deal, as obviously happened in the allegory, then the odds of
hitting the full boat are only 11 to 1. I actually held that very hand
in a game long ago, and won a good pot.
Once I even hit 5 Aces, though admittedly it was in a game with 2
jokers; I actually had A-A-A-joker-joker. Ironically, I hardly won a
thing with that hand. The other players had mostly trash, and they said
I lit up like a Christmas tree when I first looked at my hand. I even
drew a card, discarding one of my jokers in hopes of luring a sucker
in, but no one really bit.

  #17  
Old August 26th 06, 11:57 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,892
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


Taylor Kingston wrote:
help bot wrote:
Kingston shows his hand: A-A-A-K-K.
TK: "Full house, bullets backed with cowboys."


The odds of getting such a hand in five card draw are about
the same as the odds of Sanny becomming the next world
chess champion.


No, they're a bit better than that. And when you get the two pair on
the first deal, as obviously happened in the allegory, then the odds of
hitting the full boat are only 11 to 1. I actually held that very hand
in a game long ago, and won a good pot.
Once I even hit 5 Aces, though admittedly it was in a game with 2
jokers; I actually had A-A-A-joker-joker. Ironically, I hardly won a
thing with that hand. The other players had mostly trash, and they said
I lit up like a Christmas tree when I first looked at my hand. I even
drew a card, discarding one of my jokers in hopes of luring a sucker
in, but no one really bit.



What fool discards a joker? You are supposed to act
exactly as if you have a flush or a straight, and keep all
your cards, but don't frighten anyone away by making
extroadinarily big bets.

This still doesn't explain *why* you drove poor Innes insane.

And what have you and that corrupt dealer done with all of
Innes' rating points? Literally *hundreds* of them have
inexplicably disappeared and no one at the USCF can
account for all the missing points (he was at one time as
high as 2450!).

I played several hands with my 8 year old niece a while back,
and sure enough, great hands like this do come up now and
then. In fact, playing poker, I quickly won back every penny
she had taken from me at blitz chess. :D


-- help bot

  #18  
Old August 27th 06, 04:13 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics
Taylor Kingston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,807
Default Phil Innes Plays Poker


help bot wrote:
This still doesn't explain *why* you drove poor Innes insane.


Oh, no, Phil did that all on his own, or at least without my help. I
merely provide counterpoint on some occasions when his insanity spills
into this group.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phil Innes Plays Poker Taylor Kingston rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 17 August 27th 06 04:13 AM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 160 January 10th 06 02:25 PM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 163 January 10th 06 02:25 PM
Parr challenges Blair parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 201 January 3rd 06 02:19 PM
Parr challenges Blair parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 217 January 3rd 06 02:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Internet Advertising - Remortgages - Home Loan - France Hotels - Web Games