![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: game, topalovkramnik |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ which would have led to a more promising
position.After 49 moves Kramnik has an extra rook but Topalov has 2 advanced passed pawns.I am not strong enough to calculate if Topalov has enough counterplay to hold the draw.A very exciting game!E-JAY |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
EJAY wrote: Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ which would have led to a more promising position.After 49 moves Kramnik has an extra rook but Topalov has 2 advanced passed pawns.I am not strong enough to calculate if Topalov has enough counterplay to hold the draw.A very exciting game! Kramnik wins Game 2 according to www.chessbasenews.com....He was able to win a clear exchange and the rook proved to be too strong than Topalov's knight..2-0 Kramnik (and I thought the hot player Topalov was favored to win)As I stated in the previous post Topalov missed a win on move .33 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm surprised and delighted that Kramnik has retrieved his strength and his
extraordinary insight into positions. I also know Topalov sometimes starts slow and picks up steam as an event progresses. Looks like he'd better not put it off too long along Kramnik. I also hope Kramnik, with his early lead, doesn't start playing for draws now. Wilma "EJAY" wrote in ups.com: EJAY wrote: Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ which would have led to a more promising position.After 49 moves Kramnik has an extra rook but Topalov has 2 advanced passed pawns.I am not strong enough to calculate if Topalov has enough counterplay to hold the draw.A very exciting game! Kramnik wins Game 2 according to www.chessbasenews.com....He was able to win a clear exchange and the rook proved to be too strong than Topalov's knight..2-0 Kramnik (and I thought the hot player Topalov was favored to win)As I stated in the previous post Topalov missed a win on move .33 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ which would have led to a more promising
position. 34. Qc7 wins. Enormous blunder by Topalov. After f7-f5 by black I was thinking it not to be worth waching, but I was lucky I did, though it was all just luck that the Qc2 move was (naturally) missed by Kramnik (the idea was that there's now no Qxe3 by black). Chess is all luck not even counting the blunders. Black shouldn't play passive king positions like that; like playing e.g. French defence. After 49 moves Kramnik has an extra rook but Topalov has 2 advanced passed pawns.I am not strong enough to calculate if Topalov has enough counterplay to hold the draw. Now knowing R+p vs. N+p rates to be a win if the K is there stopping the pawn. It was very easy when the white K was what looks like the wrong side and then got cut off and the Re3 capped it. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Użytkownik "Wilma" napisał w wiadomo¶ci . 125.201... I'm surprised and delighted that Kramnik has retrieved his strength and his extraordinary insight into positions. Well it`s agruable. Simply Topalov missed several chances. Apparently he is not in his best form. I also know Topalov sometimes starts slow and picks up steam as an event progresses. Looks like he'd better not put it off too long along Kramnik. I also hope Kramnik, with his early lead, doesn't start playing for draws now. Kramnik is always satisfied with a draw and Topalov always plays for a win. So I won`t expect much from Kramnik-Drawnik. He became a dull and boring chesssplayer. Ont he other hand hand the match is interesting only thanks to the uncompromising fighter Topalov but as I`ve written above he is not in his best form. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
EJAY wrote: Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ which would have led to a more promising position. That's putting it mildly. Kramnik blundered terribly with 32...Bxf8?? (instead of 32...Kxf8), but Topalov completely missed his chance to win with 33.Rxg4+! (instead of 33.Qg6+?) 33...Bg7 34.Qc7! and Black must give up his queen to stop mate: 34...Qf1+ 35.Ng1 Qg2+ (else 36.Qxg7#) 36.Rxg2 and Black can resign. After 49 moves Kramnik has an extra rook but Topalov has 2 advanced passed pawns.I am not strong enough to calculate if Topalov has enough counterplay to hold the draw. A very exciting game! E-JAY Kramnik ended up winning in about 66 moves; now he's up 2-0. I wonder if Topalov has the resiliency to come back from such a gut-wrenching bang-your-head-against-the-wall might-have-been. Anyone know what the clock situation was around moves 32-33? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 24 Sep 2006 09:50:22 -0700, "EJAY" wrote:
Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ Are these games on TV in the US? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:37:47 -0400, Jud McCranie
wrote: Are these games on TV in the US? ESPN2 had the last Kasparov versus computer, but I can't find any TV coverage of the world championship. --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 24 Sep 2006 09:50:22 -0700, "EJAY" wrote:
Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ What happens after this match? Does the non-FIDE championship cease to exist, and we have only the FIDE one? --- Replace you know what by j to email |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jud McCranie wrote: On 24 Sep 2006 09:50:22 -0700, "EJAY" wrote: Topalov misses 33.Rxg4+ What happens after this match? Does the non-FIDE championship cease to exist, and we have only the FIDE one? If Kramnik wins, wouldn't it be the other way around? Or will FIDE finally recognize his legimitacy? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Veselin Topalov vs Vladimir Kramnik (Rd. 1) | LSD | rec.games.chess.analysis (Chess Analysis) | 15 | October 2nd 06 11:32 PM |
| Kramnik Internet Simul | Duncan Oxley | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 2 | July 31st 06 12:43 PM |
| Kramnik Internet Simul | Duncan Oxley | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | July 31st 06 12:43 PM |
| Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 443 | June 11th 06 09:30 AM |
| Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) | parrthenon@cs.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 445 | June 11th 06 09:30 AM |