Gruppe,

--Taylor Kingston & Phillip Innes have proved themselves inconsolable
******s. It is not my brief, or my American cousins _brief_ to toss them
out, so to speak as self-regarding turds. It is though, levied on _me_
to adjudicate. Which in time, _I_ am surely gonna do. This makes sure of
you. You will no longer have right of call, for example. Your conjugal
rights will remain, but you won't 'enjoy' - so I say - yeahh, baby!..

michael adams wrote:
Gruppe,

--Taylor Kingston & Phillip Innes have proved themselves inconsolable
******s. It is not my brief, or my American cousins _brief_ to toss them
out, so to speak as self-regarding turds. It is though, levied on _me_
to adjudicate. Which in time, _I_ am surely gonna do. This makes sure of
you. You will no longer have right of call, for example. Your conjugal
rights will remain, but you won't 'enjoy' - so I say - yeahh, baby!..


You talk like a (drugged and teleported through time) lawyer.
Adjudicate? Brief? Rights?

Speaking of teleporting through time... Larry Parr is back
again, posting about the FIDE/Karpov/Fischer thing again.
I'm trying to remember back to 1972 -- was that pre-disco?

And speaking of *******, I want to talk about GetClub.
My latest victory against Sanny's "new and improved"
program has me winning a piece in just five moves. Oh
boy am I good! A combination so deep that even a
modern day computer -- with Pentiums out the wazoo --
cannot stand against my brilliant light. This self-regarding
turd (terd?) is a "star" at GetClub, and rightly so. (I now
far out-rate both nearly-an-IM and 2300+ s.r. turds, placing
me in top-turd position there.)

But I digress. We were discussing Law, your worshipfulness.
You must adjudicate something. Hang them, let them go --
do as you must; but don't forfeit their "conjugal rights". That
would be cruel and unusual punishment (like say, forbidding
Dr. Blair from quoting anyone).

self regards,

help bot

And speaking of *******, I want to talk about GetClub.
My latest victory against Sanny's "new and improved"
program has me winning a piece in just five moves. Oh
boy am I good! A combination so deep that even a

I find you are playing only with Beginner and Easy Level, Try playing
with Normal Level and if enough time then Master Level. They will give
you the real Challenge.

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

help bot wrote:

michael adams wrote:
Gruppe,

--Taylor Kingston & Phillip Innes have proved themselves inconsolable
******s. It is not my brief, or my American cousins _brief_ to toss them
out, so to speak as self-regarding turds. It is though, levied on _me_
to adjudicate. Which in time, _I_ am surely gonna do. This makes sure of
you. You will no longer have right of call, for example. Your conjugal
rights will remain, but you won't 'enjoy' - so I say - yeahh, baby!..

You talk like a (drugged and teleported through time) lawyer.
Adjudicate? Brief? Rights?

--OK Bot, points well taken for my part & no, I'm not some brilliantly
educated barrister, operating kang-su (without a court) & I may have
overstepped the mark a few times - but hey babe that's life..

,,

Sanny wrote:

And speaking of *******, I want to talk about GetClub.
My latest victory against Sanny's "new and improved"
program has me winning a piece in just five moves. Oh
boy am I good! A combination so deep that even a

I find you are playing only with Beginner and Easy Level, Try playing
with Normal Level and if enough time then Master Level. They will give
you the real Challenge.


Egads and gadzooks! When I complained about
being unable to complete games due to the slowness
of the program, Sanny "ordered" me to play only the
lowest levels, to alleviate the problem. Now I crush
the Easy level like a bug, and Sanny wants me to
switch back to the levels where I am unable to make
any headway. Why not just "order" me to stop
noticing the problems with this program?

Look, I am simply trying to help you by noting the most
serious weaknesses, like say, the retrograde analysis also
noted by others. Apparently, your testing is not done under
the same conditions, for you never seem to notice these
delays, or the resetting analysis which seems to be at the
root of the slowness problem. One poster has pointed out
that "Jester" also uses a Java applet, but it does not lose
ground while analysing a given position. Doesn't this seem
to clearly indicate a problem with the implementation of the
Java applet on your end? Over the last several months, you
have given us precious little information to work with, so all
we can do is note these problems, and guess the most
probable cause thereof. My view is that your secrecy is
a big part of the reason you're not making very much
substantial progress. Another reason is that may of those
who might have been able to help are focusing their energies
on attacking, rather than helping, you. This is likely the
direct result of your many "unsubstantiated claims", to put
it nicely. My original advice still holds: you would probably
be far better off with a single, *expert* chess programmer,
in place of the confederacy of dunces you have now.

And I am playing the Normal level, but the game is not
making much headway. (Relax: the program made it past
move five without hanging a piece.) :D

-- help bot

And I am playing the Normal level, but the game is not
making much headway. (Relax: the program made it past
move five without hanging a piece.) :D


GAME Speed Dramatically Improved. So you can finish games in time.

Play a game: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

Do now Worry be Happy as this will give a big impulse to the Chess
game.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html