A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 18th 06, 07:01 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,980
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


Mark Houlsby wrote:


Funny how often trolls get their own thread...

Mark


Yo! You do have your own. Congrats

Ads
  #12  
Old December 18th 06, 07:24 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Mark Houlsby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 654
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


Rob wrote:

Mark Houlsby wrote:


Funny how often trolls get their own thread...

Mark


Yo! You do have your own. Congrats


Not for the first time, either...

Figure that one out....

  #13  
Old December 19th 06, 01:25 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Chess One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,003
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...

Not only is the usage of " and ' different, but Rob uses
them correctly, which speaks against the possibility of
him being a sock-puppet with intentionlly introduced
errors deigned to increase obfusation. My conclusion;
not the same person.


Guy concludes from Texas that the famous flamer Rob Mitchell is 'right', by
virtue of him being a fellow American, and Guy has never read anything
written by Forns from Yurp.

A self declared Yurp Forn, one David Richerby, has mentioned that English
people, [and I add European people too, even those not writing in English!],
use a differing system to the Murcan one, which is in fact an eccentric
punctuating system to most all other languages using a Roman* alphabet**.

Please excuse these 'complicated' ideas introduced here, which apparantly
dazzle and confuse the understanding of some Murcans, who are not always the
quickest to realise that there are other places.

I further apologise for my native country inventing the computer, the
strange and confusing terms which Babbage and Turing used, and which are
still used 'over there', and indeed, for inventing the language that Murcans
now attempt. Anyone really interested in Yurp could buy my new book, YURP
for Dimwits and Programmers, which is only 39 Yuros.

Cordially, Phil Innes

* Very old Yurp city and 'heritage' site, also had empire, et ca. Good at
engineering, slavery and war, lousy at poetry and what we, in these days,
like to call 'family values'.

**QUICK YURP TOUR. This does not imply that Roman Yurps actually still
chisel their flowcharts into stone, or that the language 'program' they used
to use was written in English. No no no! Its very compliacted! They wrote
the same alphabet in a different language! But some of it broke and was
discarded. It is untrue that Romans were the original ALGOL programmers,
because, as ani ful no, the Romans Yurps hadn't stolen the modern numbering
system from some non-Yurps, yet, and other Yurps were forced to steal it.
But the Romans did invent the decimal, and guess what it was called!







  #14  
Old December 19th 06, 06:09 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Rob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,980
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


Chess One wrote:
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...

Not only is the usage of " and ' different, but Rob uses
them correctly, which speaks against the possibility of
him being a sock-puppet with intentionlly introduced
errors deigned to increase obfusation. My conclusion;
not the same person.



Heck Guy.. once in a blue moon I might spell something correctly.

Guy concludes from Texas that the famous flamer Rob Mitchell is 'right', by
virtue of him being a fellow American, and Guy has never read anything
written by Forns from Yurp.



Man, I hate that term "famous flamer"..Sounds like there is a cross
dressing reference in there somewhere.Isn't that territory is already
owned by ECJ ? He is welcome to it!

A self declared Yurp Forn, one David Richerby, has mentioned that English
people, [and I add European people too, even those not writing in English!],
use a differing system to the Murcan one, which is in fact an eccentric
punctuating system to most all other languages using a Roman* alphabet**.

Please excuse these 'complicated' ideas introduced here, which apparantly
dazzle and confuse the understanding of some Murcans, who are not always the
quickest to realise that there are other places.

I further apologise for my native country inventing the computer, the
strange and confusing terms which Babbage and Turing used, and which are
still used 'over there', and indeed, for inventing the language that Murcans
now attempt. Anyone really interested in Yurp could buy my new book, YURP
for Dimwits and Programmers, which is only 39 Yuros.



lol

Cordially, Phil Innes

* Very old Yurp city and 'heritage' site, also had empire, et ca. Good at
engineering, slavery and war, lousy at poetry and what we, in these days,
like to call 'family values'.

**QUICK YURP TOUR. This does not imply that Roman Yurps actually still
chisel their flowcharts into stone, or that the language 'program' they used
to use was written in English. No no no! Its very compliacted! They wrote
the same alphabet in a different language! But some of it broke and was
discarded. It is untrue that Romans were the original ALGOL programmers,
because, as ani ful no, the Romans Yurps hadn't stolen the modern numbering
system from some non-Yurps, yet, and other Yurps were forced to steal it.
But the Romans did invent the decimal, and guess what it was called!


  #15  
Old December 19th 06, 06:22 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Inconnux
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 298
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


Guy concludes from Texas that the famous flamer Rob Mitchell is 'right', by
virtue of him being a fellow American, and Guy has never read anything
written by Forns from Yurp.

A self declared Yurp Forn, one David Richerby, has mentioned that English
people, [and I add European people too, even those not writing in English!],
use a differing system to the Murcan one, which is in fact an eccentric
punctuating system to most all other languages using a Roman* alphabet**.

Please excuse these 'complicated' ideas introduced here, which apparantly
dazzle and confuse the understanding of some Murcans, who are not always the
quickest to realise that there are other places.

I further apologise for my native country inventing the computer, the
strange and confusing terms which Babbage and Turing used, and which are
still used 'over there', and indeed, for inventing the language that Murcans
now attempt. Anyone really interested in Yurp could buy my new book, YURP
for Dimwits and Programmers, which is only 39 Yuros.

Cordially, Phil Innes

* Very old Yurp city and 'heritage' site, also had empire, et ca. Good at
engineering, slavery and war, lousy at poetry and what we, in these days,
like to call 'family values'.

**QUICK YURP TOUR. This does not imply that Roman Yurps actually still
chisel their flowcharts into stone, or that the language 'program' they used
to use was written in English. No no no! Its very compliacted! They wrote
the same alphabet in a different language! But some of it broke and was
discarded. It is untrue that Romans were the original ALGOL programmers,
because, as ani ful no, the Romans Yurps hadn't stolen the modern numbering
system from some non-Yurps, yet, and other Yurps were forced to steal it.
But the Romans did invent the decimal, and guess what it was called!


lol, now that is the best post I have ever read by you

  #16  
Old December 19th 06, 07:18 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
Chess One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,003
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


"Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chess One wrote:
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...

Not only is the usage of " and ' different, but Rob uses
them correctly, which speaks against the possibility of
him being a sock-puppet with intentionlly introduced
errors deigned to increase obfusation. My conclusion;
not the same person.



Heck Guy.. once in a blue moon I might spell something correctly.


I also can't spell worth a shirt. ah found reddin duz ur spelin in, an
sbetter notta duit

Guy concludes from Texas that the famous flamer Rob Mitchell is 'right',
by
virtue of him being a fellow American, and Guy has never read anything
written by Forns from Yurp.



Man, I hate that term "famous flamer"..Sounds like there is a cross
dressing reference in there somewhere.Isn't that territory is already
owned by ECJ ? He is welcome to it!


Now don't you start in on me horror I do not feel compelled to answer, and
neither affirm nor deny... nope! and thrice nope!

sfar as i no cross-dressin' is sumpun nother to cross-burnin, but ahs readin
on One Missippi right naw ans thas penty tar rooves storys init to be
convincin yuz someplaice els, doh need no craw daady tok ter mayk ut purttie
reyal

A self declared Yurp Forn, one David Richerby, has mentioned that English
people, [and I add European people too, even those not writing in
English!],
use a differing system to the Murcan one, which is in fact an eccentric
punctuating system to most all other languages using a Roman* alphabet**.

Please excuse these 'complicated' ideas introduced here, which apparantly
dazzle and confuse the understanding of some Murcans, who are not always
the
quickest to realise that there are other places.

I further apologise for my native country inventing the computer, the
strange and confusing terms which Babbage and Turing used, and which are
still used 'over there', and indeed, for inventing the language that
Murcans
now attempt. Anyone really interested in Yurp could buy my new book, YURP
for Dimwits and Programmers, which is only 39 Yuros.



lol


u wanna by won?
sential readin four Uman beens
wantsa travle abrawd
'nless their happie sayin'
therer Canadiuns
witches wot theyl du

wereass wur tawken klas litrityur if'n youn by myn
so's u went stan dowt ovur thur

wen that day of judgement comes
they'll be just like you'n me

o wen that dey
o judgement come
be like just
o you n me

Natalie Carpenter done sung it good, an she did it right her'n yanky vermon'

Cordially, Phil Innes

* Very old Yurp city and 'heritage' site, also had empire, et ca. Good at
engineering, slavery and war, lousy at poetry and what we, in these days,
like to call 'family values'.

**QUICK YURP TOUR. This does not imply that Roman Yurps actually still
chisel their flowcharts into stone, or that the language 'program' they
used
to use was written in English. No no no! Its very compliacted! They wrote
the same alphabet in a different language! But some of it broke and was
discarded. It is untrue that Romans were the original ALGOL programmers,
because, as ani ful no, the Romans Yurps hadn't stolen the modern
numbering
system from some non-Yurps, yet, and other Yurps were forced to steal it.
But the Romans did invent the decimal, and guess what it was called!




  #17  
Old December 20th 06, 08:32 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,800
Default POLL: Should we simply ignore Phil Innes and Rob Mitchell?


Chess One wrote:
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
...

Not only is the usage of " and ' different, but Rob uses
them correctly, which speaks against the possibility of
him being a sock-puppet with intentionlly introduced
errors deigned to increase obfusation. My conclusion;
not the same person.


Note that Guy Macon misspelled both "intentionally", and
IM Innes' famous hallmark, "obfuscation".


Guy concludes from Texas that the famous flamer Rob Mitchell is 'right', by
virtue of him being a fellow American, and Guy has never read anything
written by Forns from Yurp.


Here IM Innes makes the grievous error of miscounting
syllables; the word "Europe" has three, thus his "Yurp"
is, inappropriately, one syllable short of its proper length.


A self declared Yurp Forn, one David Richerby, has mentioned that English
people, [and I add European people too, even those not writing in English!],
use a differing system to the Murcan one, which is in fact an eccentric
punctuating system to most all other languages using a Roman* alphabet**.

Please excuse these 'complicated' ideas introduced here, which apparantly
dazzle and confuse the understanding of some Murcans, who are not always the
quickest to realise that there are other places.


Nonsense. We are fully aware that there are other
places besides just these United States; that is why
we have created the Army, Navy, Air Force and
Marines -- to conquer them and make them sell us
their goods in exchange for pieces of paper, which
will eventually become worthless (commonly known
as U.S. Treasuries).


I further apologise for my native country inventing the computer,


What, Ireland? The Celts invented computers, did
they?

the strange and confusing terms which Babbage and Turing used, and which are
still used 'over there', and indeed, for inventing the language that Murcans
now attempt.


Not so fast! I caught that little insult, you rascal!

Anyone really interested in Yurp could buy my new book, YURP
for Dimwits and Programmers,


This title is redundant. And you might sell more
copies if you were to change it to: "YURUP for
DIMWITS", which is a bit shorter, and thus requires
less (strenuous) thinking to read.

which is only 39 Yuros.


Euros. It does no good to change the "E" to a "Y",
because they are the same length and have the same
sound when spoken.


Cordially, Phil Innes


Dropping hints as to what you expect us to buy you
for Christmas? Cherry cordials, eh? Go back and
read the thread about *weight loss* and you will find
that there is simply no room for empty calories -- not
even at Christmas. You're getting socks, again. Yes,
that thread is here in rgc -- why do you ask? Of
course it has something to do with chess; have you
even bothered to visit a chess tournament, where
fully half the participants are in dire need of weight
loss (not to mention psychological help, but I digress)?

* Very old Yurp city and 'heritage' site, also had empire, et ca.


Abbreviating "cetera" as "ca." lends confusion, for
there is also the word "circa" which could just as
easily be represented by these same two letters.
Hence, normal practice is to spell out the whole
enchilada thus: "et cetera", meaning "and fries".
An order without fries is said to be a "Happy Meal",
because it has fewer calories and less trans fat.
(I won't even mention the inclusion of a cool toy.)


Good at
engineering, slavery and war, lousy at poetry and what we, in these days,
like to call 'family values'.

**QUICK YURP TOUR. This does not imply that Roman Yurps actually still
chisel their flowcharts into stone, or that the language 'program' they used
to use was written in English. No no no! Its very compliacted! They wrote
the same alphabet in a different language! But some of it broke and was
discarded.


I, too, have seen these mangled statues. You'd think
the greatest sculptors would have had the foresight to
reinforce such um, critical parts of the male anatomy
with steel, but no.

It is untrue that Romans were the original ALGOL programmers,
because, as ani ful no, the Romans Yurps hadn't stolen the modern numbering
system from some non-Yurps,


One wonders whether IM Innes can here recall which
people he is trying so hard not to mention by name;
specifically, the OPECs. Uh, make that the Arabs
(sorry).

yet, and other Yurps were forced to steal it.


You're justifying, again. Nobody "forced" anyone
to steal anything; they did this of their own free will.
Please try to own your actions, as well as your words.

But the Romans did invent the decimal, and guess what it was called!


A "Dewey decimal"? A point? A dot? A period?

What the heck did they need of a decimal, when
their numbers were like this: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII,
IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX?

Anyway, good luck with your book. Just keep in
mind that not everyone has the means to travel
extensively, especially in view of the U.S. dollar's
rapid decline vis-a-vis the Euro (among others).

-- help bot

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Lebanese - Personal Loan - Personal Loans - Online Loans - Free Ringtone