Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

BEST JOKE OF THE YEAR

Of course, you did make the best self-deprecating joke of the year!
You
declared 'Old English is dead', which is one of the funniest things I
EVER
read, and it must have taken you some time and considerable knowledge
to
'refute' the idea by using 4 Old English words!


...surely you mean: "... Olde Englishe words!".

I am sorry, no. It would be Englisc wordes if you wanted to try West
Saxon.

No, Old English. If I wanted to try West Saxon, or indeed a
contemporary dialect of Saxony, I'd've said that....

The word 'English' is not A. Saxon at all.

Yes, I know.

The word Englisc is specifically
West Saxon.

Yes, I know that, too.

This has nothing to do with Saxony!

Yes, I know that, too.

But I sense I address
someone of insufficient basis to contest anthing


I sense that your senses are deceiving you :-)

The word 'old' seem to stem from Mercian, and an A. Sax incorporation
from
the Norse of the Danelaw via the north of England, and it is not likely
that
'Old English' are terms that will be found together, certainly not until
as
late as the A. Sax Chronicles, and then in writing, since as ani ful no,
Saxon was hardly homogenous on the Island as any single tongue, and even
50
miles could obviate common understanding of speche


You've never visited Tyneside, have you? Or Wearside, for that matter,
or,...

??
So Mark Holesgby is a Geordie?


I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

This is what stimulated Edward to his great educational project, no?

No, he wanted money.

He wanted money? Ha!


Ha! Indeed.

And,
indeed, why he, and only he of monarchs, is called the Great.


Alfred. Peter. Catherine....

Only 2 of them English. But that would be to invoke the context - dread
words!


I'm sorry, invoke what context...? BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs. This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.

ha ha ha! What do you call this verbal device? In your honor I named
it
Brennunization, and I suggest you spare us any false modesty, since
you
are
so profoundly good at it.
---

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.


"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.

As distinct from constructing a sentence properly?

No, those two are not distinct at all.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no' is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddle

You mean, I get you to sell things to me?

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?


Like where, Phil?

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?


Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.

I know. I was mocking, dude.

You can't really fake it
so much, but you also can't shut up, so you are shown shallow in the face of
anything else. Its okay - most men do it

You always exhibit difficulty in constructing one which can be
understood by those of us who don't inhabit Planet Innes....

So you have failed to understand the issue because of compounded syntax,
and
sentences containing several phrases, which for you is some other planet,

No.

In that case, you will return to the botched question, or you will say 'no'
like saying 'aaargh!' ?


Neither of the above.

and also fail to understand much simpler issues such as 'mostly men',
presumably some liking for 'men, mostly', as an alternate unsplit pair,

Again, no.

again how wan a response. Don't wank so much in public, or you'll
surely get get show-up.


That must explain all the accolades I get for pointing out that you
need psychiatric treatment, then....


you
also have some difficulty with simple 7 and 9 word sentences in the Quiz
about which you exclaim, and even singular words, so that you ask for
definitions of what is:-

'first'
'match'

and also

'first match'


Once again, no.

Really? I distinctly remember you challening these words, each and
severally. But, no doubt you were being facetious, and acting the fool for
the amusement of the group?


Neither of the above.

Which cannot recommend your judgement, large or small, and if it were not
for your fantastic resolutions about other people, could be let lie.


No, it couldn't, and that's kinda the point....

wowa! - is it kinda what point, your ****ing highness?


I know some women who might challenge that description of me....

Instead it is worth pointing out that neither large nor small attention
attends you - since you are happy to conclude with another who also can
comprehend all 9 simple words of this latest 'question' about a question
without having an hysterical breakdown in public.


"...a hysterical breakdown," The letter "h" is a consonant. Anyone who
actually says "A nisterical breakdown" brings new meaning to the
adjective "effete", n'est-ce pas?

You are too concerned with how you appear, boy. And you appear here as the
****wit of your own description.


That, too, must explain my getting all the accolades, then....

Go back to college and finish your degree, or say what you have to say
directly to other men, and see if your snoz survives. Otherwise, there seems
nothing to you.


Tell me, does that last sentence above actually mean anything?

Mark Houlsby

Phil Innes

On Dec 27, 6:06 pm, "Mark Houlsby"
wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
roups.com...

BEST JOKE OF THE YEAR

Of course, you did make the best self-deprecating joke of the year!
You
declared 'Old English is dead', which is one of the funniest things I
EVER
read, and it must have taken you some time and considerable knowledge
to
'refute' the idea by using 4 Old English words!

...surely you mean: "... Olde Englishe words!".

I am sorry, no. It would be Englisc wordes if you wanted to try West
Saxon.

No, Old English. If I wanted to try West Saxon, or indeed a
contemporary dialect of Saxony, I'd've said that....

The word 'English' is not A. Saxon at all.Yes, I know.

The word Englisc is specifically
West Saxon.Yes, I know that, too.

This has nothing to do with Saxony!Yes, I know that, too.

But I sense I address
someone of insufficient basis to contest anthing I sense that your senses are deceiving you :-)





The word 'old' seem to stem from Mercian, and an A. Sax incorporation
from
the Norse of the Danelaw via the north of England, and it is not likely
that
'Old English' are terms that will be found together, certainly not until
as
late as the A. Sax Chronicles, and then in writing, since as ani ful no,
Saxon was hardly homogenous on the Island as any single tongue, and even
50
miles could obviate common understanding of speche

You've never visited Tyneside, have you? Or Wearside, for that matter,
or,...

??
So Mark Holesgby is a Geordie?I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

This is what stimulated Edward to his great educational project, no?

No, he wanted money.

He wanted money? Ha!Ha! Indeed.

And,
indeed, why he, and only he of monarchs, is called the Great.

Alfred. Peter. Catherine....

Only 2 of them English. But that would be to invoke the context - dread
words!I'm sorry, invoke what context...? BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs. This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.





ha ha ha! What do you call this verbal device? In your honor I named
it
Brennunization, and I suggest you spare us any false modesty, since
you
are
so profoundly good at it.
---

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
roups.com...

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.

As distinct from constructing a sentence properly?

No, those two are not distinct at all.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no' is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddleYou mean, I get you to sell things to me?

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?Like where, Phil?

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?

Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.I know. I was mocking, dude.





You can't really fake it
so much, but you also can't shut up, so you are shown shallow in the face of
anything else. Its okay - most men do it

You always exhibit difficulty in constructing one which can be
understood by those of us who don't inhabit Planet Innes....

So you have failed to understand the issue because of compounded syntax,
and
sentences containing several phrases, which for you is some other planet,

No.

In that case, you will return to the botched question, or you will say 'no'
like saying 'aaargh!' ?Neither of the above.

and also fail to understand much simpler issues such as 'mostly men',
presumably some liking for 'men, mostly', as an alternate unsplit pair,

Again, no.

again how wan a response. Don't wank so much in public, or you'll
surely get get show-up.That must explain all the accolades I get for pointing out that you
need psychiatric treatment, then....





you
also have some difficulty with simple 7 and 9 word sentences in the Quiz
about which you exclaim, and even singular words, so that you ask for
definitions of what is:-

'first'
'match'

and also

'first match'

Once again, no.

Really? I distinctly remember you challening these words, each and
severally. But, no doubt you were being facetious, and acting the fool for
the amusement of the group?Neither of the above.

Which cannot recommend your judgement, large or small, and if it were not
for your fantastic resolutions about other people, could be let lie.

No, it couldn't, and that's kinda the point....

wowa! - is it kinda what point, your ****ing highness?I know some women who might challenge that description of me....

Instead it is worth pointing out that neither large nor small attention
attends you - since you are happy to conclude with another who also can
comprehend all 9 simple words of this latest 'question' about a question
without having an hysterical breakdown in public.

"...a hysterical breakdown," The letter "h" is a consonant. Anyone who
actually says "A nisterical breakdown" brings new meaning to the
adjective "effete", n'est-ce pas?

You are too concerned with how you appear, boy. And you appear here as the
****wit of your own description.That, too, must explain my getting all the accolades, then....

Go back to college and finish your degree, or say what you have to say
directly to other men, and see if your snoz survives. Otherwise, there seems
nothing to you.

Tell me, does that last sentence above actually mean anything?

I means that Phil wants to punch you in the nose. This is often his
argument of last resort.

Taylor Kingston wrote:

On Dec 27, 6:06 pm, "Mark Houlsby"
wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
roups.com...

BEST JOKE OF THE YEAR

Of course, you did make the best self-deprecating joke of the year!
You
declared 'Old English is dead', which is one of the funniest things I
EVER
read, and it must have taken you some time and considerable knowledge
to
'refute' the idea by using 4 Old English words!

...surely you mean: "... Olde Englishe words!".

I am sorry, no. It would be Englisc wordes if you wanted to try West
Saxon.

No, Old English. If I wanted to try West Saxon, or indeed a
contemporary dialect of Saxony, I'd've said that....

The word 'English' is not A. Saxon at all.Yes, I know.

The word Englisc is specifically
West Saxon.Yes, I know that, too.

This has nothing to do with Saxony!Yes, I know that, too.

But I sense I address
someone of insufficient basis to contest anthing I sense that your senses are deceiving you :-)





The word 'old' seem to stem from Mercian, and an A. Sax incorporation
from
the Norse of the Danelaw via the north of England, and it is not likely
that
'Old English' are terms that will be found together, certainly not until
as
late as the A. Sax Chronicles, and then in writing, since as ani ful no,
Saxon was hardly homogenous on the Island as any single tongue, and even
50
miles could obviate common understanding of speche

You've never visited Tyneside, have you? Or Wearside, for that matter,
or,...

??
So Mark Holesgby is a Geordie?I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

This is what stimulated Edward to his great educational project, no?

No, he wanted money.

He wanted money? Ha!Ha! Indeed.

And,
indeed, why he, and only he of monarchs, is called the Great.

Alfred. Peter. Catherine....

Only 2 of them English. But that would be to invoke the context - dread
words!I'm sorry, invoke what context...? BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs. This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.





ha ha ha! What do you call this verbal device? In your honor I named
it
Brennunization, and I suggest you spare us any false modesty, since
you
are
so profoundly good at it.
---

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
roups.com...

sic, indeed. His point being that you often exhibit difficulty in
constructing a proper sentence.

As distinct from constructing a sentence properly?

No, those two are not distinct at all.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no' is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddleYou mean, I get you to sell things to me?

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?Like where, Phil?

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?

Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.I know. I was mocking, dude.





You can't really fake it
so much, but you also can't shut up, so you are shown shallow in the face of
anything else. Its okay - most men do it

You always exhibit difficulty in constructing one which can be
understood by those of us who don't inhabit Planet Innes....

So you have failed to understand the issue because of compounded syntax,
and
sentences containing several phrases, which for you is some other planet,

No.

In that case, you will return to the botched question, or you will say 'no'
like saying 'aaargh!' ?Neither of the above.

and also fail to understand much simpler issues such as 'mostly men',
presumably some liking for 'men, mostly', as an alternate unsplit pair,

Again, no.

again how wan a response. Don't wank so much in public, or you'll
surely get get show-up.That must explain all the accolades I get for pointing out that you
need psychiatric treatment, then....





you
also have some difficulty with simple 7 and 9 word sentences in the Quiz
about which you exclaim, and even singular words, so that you ask for
definitions of what is:-

'first'
'match'

and also

'first match'

Once again, no.

Really? I distinctly remember you challening these words, each and
severally. But, no doubt you were being facetious, and acting the fool for
the amusement of the group?Neither of the above.

Which cannot recommend your judgement, large or small, and if it were not
for your fantastic resolutions about other people, could be let lie.

No, it couldn't, and that's kinda the point....

wowa! - is it kinda what point, your ****ing highness?I know some women who might challenge that description of me....

Instead it is worth pointing out that neither large nor small attention
attends you - since you are happy to conclude with another who also can
comprehend all 9 simple words of this latest 'question' about a question
without having an hysterical breakdown in public.

"...a hysterical breakdown," The letter "h" is a consonant. Anyone who
actually says "A nisterical breakdown" brings new meaning to the
adjective "effete", n'est-ce pas?

You are too concerned with how you appear, boy. And you appear here as the
****wit of your own description.

That, too, must explain my getting all the accolades, then....

Go back to college and finish your degree, or say what you have to say
directly to other men, and see if your snoz survives. Otherwise, there seems
nothing to you.

Tell me, does that last sentence above actually mean anything?

I means that Phil wants to punch you in the nose. This is often his
argument of last resort.

O Taylor! Everything you have ever written is wrong or ill-motivated or
both!

It must be! Phil said so! You're just like that nasty Bill Brock! He's
another incarnation of Satan!

;-)

Mark,
This is what YOU wrote:


I can clearly demonstrate that the opposite is true. Do you want me to
do that?
=================================================
Question Mark..... (oh, I made a funny!)
What did that refer to and why were you making an offer?

==================================================
Then YOU said this Mark:
It's a question not of what floats my boat, but of whether you are
prepared to display a shred of integity in these groups. So far,
AFAICT, you haven't done that.
==================================================
That is your OPINION Mark and has no basis in fact. It mearly
continuesyour pattern of attacking and trolling people. A simple google
search of your name provides abple evidence of this.
================================================== ==========
Then YOU said, Mark:
No, it isn't. Your record, thus far, in these groups, has not been
good.

It's not up to me or anyone else to improve your batting average. Only
you can do that.
================================================== ============
Here you backstep because there isn't any evidence to back up your
claim. All you have is conjecture and opinion. Just remember that when
you stand in a glass house you should not throw stones.

Merry Christmas, "?" Question Mark! LOL

Rob

Taylor Kingston wrote:

Go back to college and finish your degree, or say what you have to say
directly to other men, and see if your snoz survives. Otherwise, there seems
nothing to you.

Tell me, does that last sentence above actually mean anything?

I means that Phil wants to punch you in the nose. This is often his
argument of last resort.

Well, there's also the "Robtroll runs interference" play.

Rob wrote:

Mark,
This is what YOU wrote:


I can clearly demonstrate that the opposite is true. Do you want me to
do that?
=================================================
Question Mark..... (oh, I made a funny!)
What did that refer to and why were you making an offer?

==================================================
Then YOU said this Mark:
It's a question not of what floats my boat, but of whether you are
prepared to display a shred of integity in these groups. So far,
AFAICT, you haven't done that.
==================================================
That is your OPINION Mark and has no basis in fact. It mearly
continuesyour pattern of attacking and trolling people. A simple google
search of your name provides abple evidence of this.
================================================== ==========
Then YOU said, Mark:
No, it isn't. Your record, thus far, in these groups, has not been
good.

It's not up to me or anyone else to improve your batting average. Only
you can do that.
================================================== ============
Here you backstep because there isn't any evidence to back up your
claim. All you have is conjecture and opinion. Just remember that when
you stand in a glass house you should not throw stones.

Merry Christmas, "?" Question Mark! LOL

Rob

Uh huh. Join the dots. Figure out the implications of the post to which
this is a reply.

Mark

Mark Houlsby wrote:
Rob wrote:

Mark,
This is what YOU wrote:


I can clearly demonstrate that the opposite is true. Do you want me to
do that?
=================================================
Question Mark..... (oh, I made a funny!)
What did that refer to and why were you making an offer?

==================================================
Then YOU said this Mark:
It's a question not of what floats my boat, but of whether you are
prepared to display a shred of integity in these groups. So far,
AFAICT, you haven't done that.
==================================================
That is your OPINION Mark and has no basis in fact. It mearly
continuesyour pattern of attacking and trolling people. A simple google
search of your name provides abple evidence of this.
================================================== ==========
Then YOU said, Mark:
No, it isn't. Your record, thus far, in these groups, has not been
good.

It's not up to me or anyone else to improve your batting average. Only
you can do that.
================================================== ============
Here you backstep because there isn't any evidence to back up your
claim. All you have is conjecture and opinion. Just remember that when
you stand in a glass house you should not throw stones.

Merry Christmas, "?" Question Mark! LOL

Rob

Uh huh. Join the dots. Figure out the implications of the post to which
this is a reply.

Mark

Dear "?",

Prove what you infer is true.
And then cease the trolling.

Rob

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

because you are so important?

\

I'm sorry, invoke what context...?

Check the thread name.

BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs.

Check the context of what was said.

This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no'
is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddle

You mean, I get you to sell things to me?

No, I mean you are a dunce.

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?


Like where, Phil?

Like, uh, everywhere, dude.

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

You mnean for daring to address a few nutters on newsnet? Pardon me, your
Highness!

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?


Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.

I know. I was mocking, dude.

You were faking. I think I've figured out that you know nothing about what
you write, not on any subject. Let the rest be silence, eh?everyone is
looking

PI

You can't really fake it
so much, but you also can't shut up, so you are shown shallow in the face
of
anything else. Its okay - most men do it

You always exhibit difficulty in constructing one which can be
understood by those of us who don't inhabit Planet Innes....

So you have failed to understand the issue because of compounded
syntax,
and
sentences containing several phrases, which for you is some other
planet,

No.

In that case, you will return to the botched question, or you will say
'no'
like saying 'aaargh!' ?


Neither of the above.

and also fail to understand much simpler issues such as 'mostly men',
presumably some liking for 'men, mostly', as an alternate unsplit
pair,

Again, no.

again how wan a response. Don't wank so much in public, or you'll
surely get get show-up.


That must explain all the accolades I get for pointing out that you
need psychiatric treatment, then....


you
also have some difficulty with simple 7 and 9 word sentences in the
Quiz
about which you exclaim, and even singular words, so that you ask for
definitions of what is:-

'first'
'match'

and also

'first match'


Once again, no.

Really? I distinctly remember you challening these words, each and
severally. But, no doubt you were being facetious, and acting the fool
for
the amusement of the group?


Neither of the above.

Which cannot recommend your judgement, large or small, and if it were
not
for your fantastic resolutions about other people, could be let lie.


No, it couldn't, and that's kinda the point....

wowa! - is it kinda what point, your ****ing highness?


I know some women who might challenge that description of me....

Instead it is worth pointing out that neither large nor small
attention
attends you - since you are happy to conclude with another who also
can
comprehend all 9 simple words of this latest 'question' about a
question
without having an hysterical breakdown in public.


"...a hysterical breakdown," The letter "h" is a consonant. Anyone who
actually says "A nisterical breakdown" brings new meaning to the
adjective "effete", n'est-ce pas?

You are too concerned with how you appear, boy. And you appear here as
the
****wit of your own description.


That, too, must explain my getting all the accolades, then....

Go back to college and finish your degree, or say what you have to say
directly to other men, and see if your snoz survives. Otherwise, there
seems
nothing to you.


Tell me, does that last sentence above actually mean anything?

Mark Houlsby

Phil Innes

Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

because you are so important?

\

I'm sorry, invoke what context...?

Check the thread name.

BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs.

Check the context of what was said.


Ok. I did that. Still nothing about specifically English monarchs.

This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no'
is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddle

You mean, I get you to sell things to me?

No, I mean you are a dunce.


Oh, ok. Well, as I have said, my being a dunce is hardly news. What
should be
worrying you, perhaps, is that compared with you, this dunce looks like
Einstein, and, as a result, gets a lot of accolades. Your not receiving
opprobrium is down to your buddy Rob.

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?


Like where, Phil?

Like, uh, everywhere, dude.


A specific example would be nice...

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

You mnean for daring to address a few nutters on newsnet? Pardon me, your
Highness!


No, I mean when you've been demonstrated to be an ignorant and stupid
troll.

It happens frequently.

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?


Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.

I know. I was mocking, dude.

You were faking.

No, I meant it.


I think I've figured out that you know nothing about what
you write, not on any subject.

I don't doubt that you have figured that out to your own satisfaction.
Everyone else, besides Rob, seems to hold a different point-of-view
about who wins our little exchanges.

Let the rest be silence, eh?everyone is
looking


You mean... you agree to stop posting? Excellent news.

MH

PI

Mark Houlsby wrote:
Chess One wrote:

"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
ups.com...

I've no idea about that. I am, though. I even posted my address
recently. Also, I wrote to Tim Hanke that Eric Idle and I were born in
the same town, South Shields. You didn't know these things?

because you are so important?

\

I'm sorry, invoke what context...?

Check the thread name.

BTW I know that the other two were
not English. Your earlier assertion said nothing about English as a
necessary characteristic for great monarchs.

Check the context of what was said.


Ok. I did that. Still nothing about specifically English monarchs.

This is why I mentioned
the others. I could have mentioned Herod. I didn't.

Not at all distinct? You are still troping, neh? But why argue when 'no'
is
enough for your esteem, except of course you back peddle

You mean, I get you to sell things to me?

No, I mean you are a dunce.


Oh, ok. Well, as I have said, my being a dunce is hardly news. What
should be
worrying you, perhaps, is that compared with you, this dunce looks like
Einstein, and, as a result, gets a lot of accolades. Your not receiving
opprobrium is down to your buddy Rob.

radically when your
silly comments are challenged. Did you not think this was evident?


Like where, Phil?

Like, uh, everywhere, dude.


A specific example would be nice...

'Twould be nice to see you retrace a few steps and eat humble pie once
in a while.

You mnean for daring to address a few nutters on newsnet? Pardon me, your
Highness!


No, I mean when you've been demonstrated to be an ignorant and stupid
troll.

It happens frequently.

But what is a trope,
among we hyper-criticals?


Or betwene...?

Good try, but unfortunately not a word then or now.

I know. I was mocking, dude.

You were faking.

No, I meant it.


I think I've figured out that you know nothing about what
you write, not on any subject.



I don't doubt that you have figured that out to your own satisfaction.
Everyone else, besides Rob, seems to hold a different point-of-view
about who wins our little exchanges.


Dear"?",

since you mentioned me, I will respond. Who is "everyone"?

I doubt the "everyone" is more than four or five frequently posting
people of dubious intent and they would hardly qualify as a valid cross
section of anything except the most frustrated
representation of a group of miscreants trolling the newsgroups. Do
you, "?", consider yourself a member of this group?

ROb
Let the rest be silence, eh?everyone is
looking


You mean... you agree to stop posting? Excellent news.

MH

PI