Jason__911 wrote:

"Chess One" ie; Phil Innes wrote in message
news:%gkCh.1384$aM.440@trndny03...
2) I think I mentioned that actually playing chess is the real test

Phil, YOU don't actually play chess. YOU haven't played a rated tournament
game in over ten years. Your real rating is very likely somewhere in the "b"
class or worse now, as usually happens to an old geezer ..

Jase, why don't you sign up & go off to Iraq & get yourself 'foaded' -
that way you'll avoid becoming a 'bof' (boring old fart) & I'm not an
armchair. But you're a coward & a bully - so no chance..

Jason__911 wrote:

...

FYI, if you mouthed off to me like that in person little "mikey" boy, you
wouldn't be able to walk away on your own power. That is a fact you can take
to the bank, kid.


Get lost small-dik, before I _really_ do you..

"Jason_911" wrote in message
news:Ho8Ch.1046627$R63.833007@pd7urf1no...

Retard boy....I expected to have to repeat myself many times before
something would penetrate into your thick, 1400 rated, illiterate,
fetal-alcohol effects brain, but this is getting ridiculous.

Several things.

1) I see this post has now totally abandoned the previous topic [Topalov],
and any chess content at all.

2) I think I mentioned that actually playing chess is the real test, and as
Fischer said of politics, the truth lies in pawns! So figure out if its
really chess interest or really self-advertisement. Talk is okay, but talk
instead of play is laughable! Often it seems the strongest opinions issue
from non-players, a curiosity!

3) Please trim your posts, especially if you only respond to one paragraph.
It may seem like the debate of the century, but get over yourself!

4) Although the term 'moron' is often thrown around in net-culture to one's
correspondents, the smarter poster realises that morons can't write. If
suitable other words do not occur to you to describe what you observe, you
shouldn't write either. Time to read more and learn what words mean,
otherwise you rather waste any potential increment you may have over a
moron, with result that you are the same.

5) Morons are often and even typically very affectionate, generous people,
and if managing your own massive IQ causes you to be an abusive intolerant
grump in public, consider doing your own brain surgery, since your putative
advantage of being potentially smarter is so overwhelming in your case as to
render such advantage moot. The emphasis in this paragraph is of course to
speak of /potential/ intelligence factors which require two things, exercise
and study, just like chess itself.

Phil Innes

Jason__911 wrote:

"michael adams", the insecure little faggot with no identity who lives
vicariously through his GM hero's life.

Get the **** out of here punk!

My identity is clearly more than you can make do with, you putrid,
maggot riddled, stinky chunk of meat. Take a 'pander' you canuk turkey.
Gobble up some of your own smelly ****. Gobble, gobble, gobbble..

The term Moron was coined by H. Goddard, and has somewhat changed over the
years from initial IQ range of 51-70 to the current designation 50-69. It is
sometimes used to describe adults whose 'mental-age' is 8-12 years, though
this is an ad hoc description and not a clinical definition.

Here below is an article and combo-appreciation of the relative intelligence
quotients of Democratic and Republican Presidents of the United States of
America.
-----------


In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute of Scranton,
Pennsylvania detailed its findings of a four month study of the intelligence
quotient of President George W. Bush. Since 1973, the Lovenstein Institute
has published its research to the education community on each new president,
which includes the famous "IQ" report among others.

According to statements in the report, there have been twelve presidents
over the past 50 years, from F.D. Roosevelt to G. W. Bush who were all rated
based on scholarly achievements, writings that they alone produced without
aid of staff, their ability to speak with clarity, and several other
psychological factors which were then scored in the Swanson/Crain system of
intelligence ranking.

The study determined the following IQs of each president as accurate to
within five percentage points:

147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
132 Harry Truman (D)
122 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R)
174 John F. Kennedy (D)
126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
155 Richard M. Nixon (R)
121 Gerald Ford (R)
175 James E. Carter (D)
105 Ronald Reagan (R)
098 George HW Bush (R)
182 William J. Clinton (D)
091 George W. Bush (R)


The six Republican presidents of the past 50 years had an average IQ of
115.5, with President Nixon having the highest IQ, at 155. President G. W.
Bush was rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91.

The six Democrat presidents had IQs with an average of 156, with President
Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated
the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126. No president other than
Carter (D) has released his actual IQ, 176.

Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President GW Bush,
his low ratings were due to his apparent difficulty to command the English
language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words
for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents)*, his lack
of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body
of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis. The complete report
documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings,
including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis.

"All the Presidents prior to George W. Bush had a least one book under their
belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or
early careers. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein said. "He has no
published works or writings, so in many ways that made it more difficult to
arrive at an assessment. We had to rely more heavily on transcripts of his
unscripted public speaking."

The Lovenstein Institute of Scranton Pennsylvania think tank includes high
caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human
behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein,
world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a
world-respected psychiatrist.

This study was commissioned on February 13, 2001 and released on July 9,
2001 to subscribing member universities and organizations within the
education community

Editor's Note: This is purported to be an Urban Myth, but President MORON is
still a MORON.

----
1) Although this review seems generally accurate, its conclusion is
technically incorrect, since the President in question exceeds the range for
moron.

2) *Anyone interested in quantity of elected words in volunteered speech,
now and then, and in relation to either professions or academic distinction,
write me. It is of particular note that words known is a quite different
factor from words voluntarily used. Distinctions of words known tend to vary
with academic distinction or serious studies, rather than with professions
[though combining in medical doctors for most known except for professional
bibliophiles]. Words used voluntarily are not so differentiated, and at
least one hypothesis posits volunteered speech to be as little as 800 to
1,500 words across all occupations and academic dignities - and in fact, no
different that country use in the C13th!

3) *It is amusing, and perhaps insturctive, that I once wrote to Dr. Rupert
Sheldrake to ask him about a parrot N'Kisi, which had I thought gained 700
words. Dr. S told me that it achieved 1,000 words of speech, cogently
sequenced into sentences, and 'in context' rather than randomly produced.
The parrot also had an aquisition rate for words the same as a human infant
for the first three years. At 1,000 words it stopped gaining new ones, and
made do, like so many people, with the ones it had

4) IQ does not seem to have a direct correlative with chess ability, since
the prime locus of IQ tests have been right-brained sequential processing
[as math, and sentence construction], and lacks any /un-cued/ measurement of
pattern recognition, which is the corresponding factor attributed by de
Groot to mastery at chess play.

Phil Innes

"Chess One" ie; Phil Innes wrote in message
news:%gkCh.1384$aM.440@trndny03...
2) I think I mentioned that actually playing chess is the real test

Phil, YOU don't actually play chess. YOU haven't played a rated tournament
game in over ten years. Your real rating is very likely somewhere in the "b"
class or worse now, as usually happens to an old geezer who is out of the
game for awhile. We had a couple of guys in your age range who used to be
2300 that came back for some OTB and ended up performing like "a" class
players. You've never been anywhere near 2300, nor do you have any FIDE
rating. At your pinnicle peak best you were once rated 2044, but that was a
long time ago and is clearly no longer the case.

Apparently you don't even play online speed games because you've never once
mentioned doing that. If you did we could arrange to meet somewhere, such as
Playchess. I play there pretty much every day, and most, if not all, of the
players over 2100 who make posts here have already played me many times,
though they might not want to admit what their results were.

As I said, battling your quad core computer against someone else's in a game
of internet corr. chess is not "playing chess".

Jason Repa

Jason__911 wrote:

You're a pathetic, whining, crybaby, faggot loser "michael adams". Is M.A.
the only GM whose dick you fantasize about sucking? Or do you worship and
dream about G.K and V.K

Certainly not! There's no way in the world I fantazise about
chess-players in general. What a pathetic bunch of intellectual ******s.
Witness for example the last days of Alekhine - a great Natzi & just
look @ his fall from the heights. Mikail Tal a notorious drunk etc.
Shifting the pieces is an old mans pastime not easily given over to the
peregrinations of a young ****** such as yourself Jason. You have to
beat yourself up that you're never gonna make Michael Adams GM status.
That's really interesting but you still like to play the 'game'. OK - I
know, talk to Phil, he's a sympathetic ear to your troubles plus (+) he
has the added experience of Michael Adams in the flesch so to speak.
Well, I hope I've helped you along the line a distance. Good luck with
your further endeavours in the ah. chess world & do keep in touch..

"Chess One" wrote in message
news:kelCh.6376$am1.670@trndny01...

4) IQ does not seem to have a direct correlative with chess ability, since
the prime locus of IQ tests have been right-brained sequential processing
[as math, and sentence construction],

Actually, that's LEFT-BRAINED activity Phil.

And while there may not be a "direct" relationship to chess and IQ, I think
you would be hard pressed to find someone who has played for some time and
studied the game, but who maintains a rating of 1500 or less, with anything
more than a 90 something IQ.

JMR

On Feb 19, 12:41 pm, "Jason__911" wrote:
"Chess One" ie; Phil Innes wrote in messagenews:%gkCh.1384$aM.440@trndny03...

2) I think I mentioned that actually playing chess is the real test

Phil, YOU don't actually play chess. YOU haven't played a rated tournament
game in over ten years. Your real rating is very likely somewhere in the "b"
class or worse now, as usually happens to an old geezer who is out of the
game for awhile. We had a couple of guys in your age range who used to be
2300 that came back for some OTB and ended up performing like "a" class
players. You've never been anywhere near 2300, nor do you have any FIDE
rating. At your pinnicle peak best you were once rated 2044, but that was a
long time ago and is clearly no longer the case.

Apparently you don't even play online speed games because you've never once
mentioned doing that. If you did we could arrange to meet somewhere, such as
Playchess. I play there pretty much every day, and most, if not all, of the
players over 2100 who make posts here have already played me many times,
though they might not want to admit what their results were.

As I said, battling your quad core computer against someone else's in a game
of internet corr. chess is not "playing chess".

Jason Repa

Skippy, You would rather give banal excuses than take any opportunity
to play. But thats okay. Spider Monkeys aren't know for having a great
attention span.

"Rob" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Feb 18, 11:28 pm, "Jason__911" wrote:
Chess fruit....ease off on the estrogen pills for a little whilte and
maybe
you'll grow enough balls to post your real name. Until then you're just a
pathetic little coward living in fear that nobody will pay any attention
to.
One thing i'm certain of is that you're no chess player. I am 100%
positive
that you're "b" class or weaker.

JMR

Jason Repa
161 Cathedral Ave Ste 16
Winnipeg, MB
(204) 282-7761



Jason Repa
161 Cathedral Ave Ste 16
Winnipeg, MB
(204) 282-7761


Jason Repa
161 Cathedral Ave Ste 16
Winnipeg, MB
(204) 282-7761


Jason Repa
161 Cathedral Ave Ste 16
Winnipeg, MB
(204) 282-7761


As I've already posted in the other thread......

You've got the address right, but that's my old Shaw phone number that I
don't use anymore. Feel free to send me an email to that email address if
you want to come by to "say hi". I'm still waiting for army boy Matt Nemmers
to pay me a visit as he promised to a couple of years ago. It's actually a
very nice and quiet area. I'm close to the river where I have a nice jogging
trail I use in the summer. It's no "border town", it's a well-know city
called WINNIPEG.

Poor Rob is so frustrated that I exposed him for the mentally retarded
little cretin he is. He still hasn't answered my question as to why a guy
that dumb who is completely incapable of playing the game of chess spends so
much time loitering in a chess usenet group. Perhaps he thinks that being
around people who are more intelligent than he is will benefit him. I doubt
it.

Rob is the kind of guy who had to work very hard at everything all his life
just to try to creep by with a passing grade. He can't stand the fact that
someone like me has always had it very easy getting to the top ten % or
better at everything with little effort.

I really should feel sorry for and bad about picking on a moron like Rob,
but somehow I don't.

JMR