"help bot" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 18, 9:22 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:

Randy Bauer is a chicken **** little closet faggot that backed down from
dealing with me some time ago. He even posted himself that he would run
to
the cops if I beat him up. I'm not surprised a moron with an IQ in the
range
of 50-70 such as yourself picks a loser like Bauer to make a reference
to.

So tell us....what do you do for a living? You're probably not bright or
competant enough to flip burgers.

JMR

It's spelled "competent", IQ boy.

Only an idiot such as yourself, Kennedy, would stoop to bickering about a
trivial spelling error as the concepts are flying right over your 1300 rated
head.

You lack the intelligence and knowledge to form a cogent argument so you run
spell checker praying for an opportunity to start whining about a simple
spelling mistake which has no significance whatsoever.

Keep crying you frustrated little boy. You'll always be a pathetic little
1300 rated loser, at everything you do.

JMR

help bot wrote:

Of course, *competent* English writers
write them separately, as they are two separate words. I'm
confidant you will learn all about this sort of thing when you
get out of Junior High, and into the big league of High School,
my boy.

It's "confident", dumb bot.

So I guess there is another "Jason Repa" from shaw who played on
FICS as a weak-assed 1600 player, and who posted to this group
claiming he was a big fish there. Yeah, you are a ****ing
pathetic liar, Repa. I call you out on this one.

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw .ca!pd7tw3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.78.164.21
Reply-To: "^Jason `~`"
From: "^Jason `~`"
Newsgroups:
rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.misc,rec. games.chess.politics
References: .com
Vr9cg.179765$7a.41373@pd7tw1no
Wwzcg.184314$WI1.152779@pd7tw2no
. com

Subject: Why should I play chess???
Lines: 49
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Rfc2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: ma7dg.186019$P01.127170@pd7tw3no
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:49:22 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.66.94.143
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1148518162 24.66.94.143 (Wed, 24 May 2006 18:49:22 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:49:22 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.games.chess.analysis:101094
rec.games.chess.misc:257017 rec.games.chess.politics:294285

Just answer me this Chess Freak. If I got "spanked" as you say....why am i
still generally the highest rated player on FICS? I've now played about 120
games there so I think my rating can be considered to be quite established.

At 1953, I'm almost always the highest rated "human" player on the site. I
will relent this much, the ratings on FICS are lower than elsewhere, but
that's only because FICS is a ****ing ghost town. There's hardly anyone to
play over 1600 so it's very very hard to maintiain a decent rating. After a
few hours of being the highest rated player on the site (according to seek
graph) I played a guy some 3 mintue games who was rated 2017 or something
like that three games (won 2 of them) who I would say is clearly a master.
On Playchess he would probably be around 2200-2300.....but on PlayChess he
wouldn't be the highest rated......he would be in the top 10% with around
50-150 players higher rated.....many of them FM's, IM's, and GM's.

And my ego isn't in a chess rating.....I like strong opponents because I am
still learning in chess and desire to improve my game further. I notice that
alot of online players (on all sites) will bottom feed and avoid people who
seem to have their number. I, conversely, will take on all commers and love
to play someone who can beat me and force me to raise the level of my play.

Maybe i'm only being this diplomatic because i'm somewhat intoxicated as I
type this, but perhaps we can continue to argue our differences of opinion
in a more civilized tone. Do you agree?

Jason


"Chess Freak" wrote in message
t...
liar


"Jason 911" wrote in message
news:9v9Dh.1089009$5R2.336674@pd7urf3no...
Nice try Chess Fruit. I told everyone what my account name was numerous
times and it's neither one of those.

It's obvious you're the SaddamSays account and you lost to another
weakie. LOL

In your wet dreams you couldn't be a 2200-2300 play like I am.

Not only is this imbecile a snivelling coward that won't post his real
name. He's a 1600 rated patzer, ROFL!

JMR

"help bot" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 19, 3:53 pm, "Jason__911" wrote:

Innes, It's interesting how you convienently

It's spelled "conveniently", IQ boy. Pretty much just
the way it sounds.

Such a bitch@!

Is the word related in English to CONYNE: knowledge, an A. N word?

With fals conynge whiche sche hadde
Hire clos envye thos sche spradde.
/Gower, MS Antiq, &c

Of course it is Latinate, with the conjunction of Convenio and Ventum; [to
come]. The same 'vent' appears in intervene, advent, event, revenue &c

Our colleague is as sparse with spelling as were they who indifferently
transmigrated these sounds of Latin to later-English. Wherefore are we in
criticism if we do not understand /how/ such things operate, so that we
should say, PEERis, for Paris?

Heuch. Phil

On Feb 24, 5:50 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"help bot" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Feb 19, 3:53 pm, "Jason__911" wrote:

Innes, It's interesting how you convienently

It's spelled "conveniently", IQ boy. Pretty much just
the way it sounds.

Such a bitch@!

Is the word related in English to CONYNE: knowledge, an A. N word?

With fals conynge whiche sche hadde
Hire clos envye thos sche spradde.
/Gower, MS Antiq, &c

Of course it is Latinate, with the conjunction of Convenio and Ventum; [to
come]. The same 'vent' appears in intervene, advent, event, revenue &c

Our colleague is as sparse with spelling as were they who indifferently
transmigrated these sounds of Latin to later-English. Wherefore are we in
criticism if we do not understand /how/ such things operate, so that we
should say, PEERis, for Paris?

Heuch. Phil

Uh, right. Whatever.

My point was simply that IQ boy, aka Jason Repa, keeps
doling out his insults but all the while making such errors
as can only be interpreted as an inability to spell common
words, some of them quite easy in fact. The comparison
of his *claimed* intelligence to that portion which we all can
plainly see is remarkable in the canyon-sized gap which
exists in between! Add to this a plethora of failed attempts
to lend himself support in his mission as rgc insult-King by
posing under many different handles -- yet so transparently
that even a child could see through his shallow game -- and
what can be concluded, but that he either *is* a young child,
or else he is perhaps the most obtuse poster I have yet
encountered here, save perhaps the five-year-old who went
'round saying things like "You are dumb!", with no apparent
rhyme or reason. (Come to think of it, that may have been
our very own Jason Repa, just in a slightly different mood.)

It really bugs me that this programmer who created the
JR insult-bot could not manage at least a reasonable
imitation of artificial intelligence. We are so advanced in
some areas, yet so very backward in others. It's almost as
if the programmer got carried away in implementing the
sideline, the chess playing aspect, and "forgot" to do his
main job, which obviously was writing a decent insult-bot.
Such a simple task, and yet such a mucked-up job of it.
If I were his boss, I'd fire him and send him over to work
for Sanny, I would. I call that win-win.

-- help bot

"help bot" wrote in message
s.com...

Uh, right. Whatever.

My point was simply that IQ boy, aka Jason Repa, keeps
doling out his insults but all the while making such errors
as can only be interpreted as an inability to spell common
words, some of them quite easy in fact.

Shoot, if I read in Anglo Saxon for a few hours I also can't spell worth a
shirt, Ninglysh norm Erikun. Jus coz he kent spel dunmene hiz idees r@nutz.
they is only insimdentably soo. smore importulent, if yoon dask me, if'n the
structural thingymebobs line up to ken his fawts.

The comparison
of his *claimed* intelligence to that portion which we all can
plainly see is remarkable in the canyon-sized gap which
exists in between!

Less he is smarter than both of us put together, and its self-effacing
parody. Though, this is rarely seen on usenet, which more often sponsors 8
year-old stinky-poo insults, you got to be 10 to do sex, and 47 for politics

Add to this a plethora of failed attempts
to lend himself support in his mission as rgc insult-King by
posing under many different handles

neglecting only the shower-handle - but there is an interesting stem~word,
which we continue to spell variously.

As in WINDLASS, the handle of which is called a HANDLASS. You would think
the last syllable abbreviated, no, as forshortened hypenations sometimes
are. HAND-BREDE is A. Sax., [HANDIG is L.G.] and means hand's breadth.
Another old word is HANDELL, from /Pegge/ which is 'a fuller's instrument',
which evolved HANDFUL, meaning 4 inches, being the measure of a hand, which
also had the synonym 'a span'. Later, post-Elizabethan Dekker used
HANDLOCKED for handcuffed, but HANDYCUFFS meant something else, blows!
[Florio] Also rendered HANDYBLOWS [Hawkins].

So this spelling HANDLE is odd, out of accord with the pattern. But this
almost certainly because without a suffix HANDL [Icel, Norse] was cumbersome
to say in A. Sax., and later English stipped off that not-silent, and not
even present [!] 'e' from the end, leaving us with HAND, yet retaining the L
[+'e'] sound from East Saxon Norsc.

Why indeed this atavism survived a few hundred years of indifferent spelling
with variations on 'handell' is one of the remarkable interesting things
about the continuing existance of A. Sax. particularly in people's speech,
and we must assume that the few who were literate eventually gave up on A.
Norm. phoneticism, and gave in to the spoken word, so handell became handle
again.

What do you think?

Phil

-- yet so transparently
that even a child could see through his shallow game -- and
what can be concluded, but that he either *is* a young child,
or else he is perhaps the most obtuse poster I have yet
encountered here, save perhaps the five-year-old who went
'round saying things like "You are dumb!", with no apparent
rhyme or reason. (Come to think of it, that may have been
our very own Jason Repa, just in a slightly different mood.)

It really bugs me that this programmer who created the
JR insult-bot could not manage at least a reasonable
imitation of artificial intelligence. We are so advanced in
some areas, yet so very backward in others. It's almost as
if the programmer got carried away in implementing the
sideline, the chess playing aspect, and "forgot" to do his
main job, which obviously was writing a decent insult-bot.
Such a simple task, and yet such a mucked-up job of it.
If I were his boss, I'd fire him and send him over to work
for Sanny, I would. I call that win-win.

-- help bot