NO ALIAS?

I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and
out there, and part of my email address! You know it
as well as anyone here.. I backed down from no OTB
match, I simply wasn't going to travel to Canada based
on your challenge.-- "SBD"

Steven Dowd/James Rynd/SBD have emerged from
remission. Jason Repa administered a bit of verbal
buckshot, and SBD is/are back.

Readers will recollect that Dowd/Rynd forged my
name at a website, later admitting that such was not
their most glowing moment.

On that, we disagreed. I thought the act
emblematic -- a badge on his/their escutcheon.

Readers will be forgiven if they imagine that
Dowd/Rynd appear under a variety of names because,
well, they do so. If they can forge the names of
others, they will certainly provide monickers for
themselves beyond what is on their birth certificate.

The key point is that Dowd/Rynd have returned
to our forum, claiming a malady for the reason that
they are unable to play a chess match with Mr. Repa.

NMnot Taylor Kingston, Dowd/Rynd -- they do
have their reasons, don't they?



SBD wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:38 am, "Jason_911" wrote:
SBD is another pathetic crybaby who hides behind an alias that can't play
chess, or do anything else with any degree of competance for that matter.
Not only did this whining ninny back down from an OTB match, he wouldn't
even play me online. I suppose that's because both of us know what the
result would be. You are a loser buddy, and you'll always be a loser. You
have less significance in this world than a cockroach.


I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and out there, and part
of my email address! You know it as well as anyone here.

I backed down from no OTB match, I simply wasn't going to travel to
Canada based on your challenge - again, it seemed to me you were the
one with the point to prove especially since I outrate you by aprox
200 points, and you didn't make an offer to play on-line. That I would
have had to decline as my rheumatoid arthritis makes it impossible to
play chess well with quick time controls. I can only hold a rating of
2100-2200 (where I currently play - playchess.com) in quick time
controls as I simply can't move as fast as I used to.

But sure, travel here with the money you offered to play for (but not
those worthless Canadian $$), and I'll be happy to play a match with
you. Anytime, you just travel down here to play and its on. Now that
I am retired, I have a lot of time to play chess.

Steven B. "Less than a cockroach" Dowd

Now, let's wait for the angry, yet empty reply of the little boy Jason.

Chris, you're not capable of "rational discussion". You have no ability
whatsoever to comprehend simple logic or perform basic reasoning. You won't
even acknowledge the fact that you said "I don't play much" as a pathetic
attempt to try to justify your 1000 (retard level) rating.

This moron AGAIN backs down like the pathetic coward he is even though I
suggested playing online. Of all the lame excuses I've heard for wimping out
of a chess match, yours takes the cake!? It's a forgone conclusion that I
would have won a minimum of 80% of the games. You know it, and I know it.
And that's the real reason you're backing down.

Face it, you're a frightened little ninny who's afraid of his own shadow. In
the real world you have no influence and get no respect from anyone....not
even your mother. You hide in usenet forums to seek respite from your
pathetic existence. You've shown us who the frustrated little boy is kiddo,
and you're completely helpless.

JMR

"Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 16, 11:23 am, "SBD" wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:38 am, "Jason_911" wrote:

SBD is another pathetic crybaby who hides behind an alias that can't
play
chess, or do anything else with any degree of competance for that
matter.
Not only did this whining ninny back down from an OTB match, he
wouldn't
even play me online. I suppose that's because both of us know what the
result would be. You are a loser buddy, and you'll always be a loser.
You
have less significance in this world than a cockroach.

I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and out there, and part
of my email address! You know it as well as anyone here.

I backed down from no OTB match, I simply wasn't going to travel to
Canada based on your challenge - again, it seemed to me you were the
one with the point to prove especially since I outrate you by aprox
200 points, and you didn't make an offer to play on-line. That I would
have had to decline as my rheumatoid arthritis makes it impossible to
play chess well with quick time controls. I can only hold a rating of
2100-2200 (where I currently play - playchess.com) in quick time
controls as I simply can't move as fast as I used to.

But sure, travel here with the money you offered to play for (but not
those worthless Canadian $$), and I'll be happy to play a match with
you. Anytime, you just travel down here to play and its on. Now that
I am retired, I have a lot of time to play chess.

Steven B. "Less than a cockroach" Dowd

Now, let's wait for the angry, yet empty reply of the little boy Jason.

I would be happy to coordinate the match on chessworld.net. We could
even have the game annotated. All Jason has to do is sign up and agree
to play.
Rob

Internet corr. games is not "playing chess". It's computer & database vs
computer & database. Don't pretend like you don't already know that Rob.

There are two sites where cheating (in fast games) is not possible. ICC and
PlayChess. I would have played this coward SBD at EITHER of those sites, but
alas, he knows he's a weakling compared to me and would lose badly so he
backed right down as predicted.

On Feb 17, 12:11 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
This moron AGAIN backs down like the pathetic coward he is even though I
suggested playing online. Of all the lame excuses I've heard for wimping out
of a chess match, yours takes the cake!? It's a forgone conclusion that I
would have won a minimum of 80% of the games. You know it, and I know it.
And that's the real reason you're backing down.

Face it, you're a frightened little ninny who's afraid of his own shadow. In
the real world you have no influence and get no respect from anyone....not
even your mother. You hide in usenet forums to seek respite from your
pathetic existence. You've shown us who the frustrated little boy is kiddo,
and you're completely helpless.

JMR



Dowd is an overrated mouthpiece who hasn't played a rated game in 2
years. I guess his "arthritis" prevents him from playing slow games as
well, lol! If you're bored and don't have any paint to watch dry, you
can do a search and find the many dozens of rubbish posts this twit
has made that makes it quite clear he's all bark, no bite.

Steve

This is funny how you claim that Repa is the one with the "point to
prove", when it's YOU that chickened out of playing him. He even
offered to play you at an online site that you say you play at, but
you backed down and won't play. As for Canadian $$ being worthless,
the Canadian $$ is trading alot closer with the USD these days, than
in the past, but the USD keeps losing more and more value relative to
the Euro.

And an American taking pot shots at Canada is quite hillarious!
Canadians enjoy a much higher standard of living than Americans across
the board. Much lower crime rate, cleaner air, health care, etc, etc,
etc. America is turning into one big prison with well over 2.5 million
Americans in jail. You're also systematically losing more and more of
your already limited rights and freedom under the pretense of
"fighting terror". There are many times more Americans trying to
immigrate to Canada than the converse because most of them are at
least bright enough to know that the grass is indeed greener up North.

I'm going to assume that even an uneducated, burned-out old geezer
like you Dowd has enough "live" brain cells working to be able to
figure out how to do some simple research to confirm what i've said.

Steve

On Feb 17, 12:13 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

oups.com...



On Feb 16, 11:23 am, "SBD" wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:38 am, "Jason_911" wrote:

SBD is another pathetic crybaby who hides behind an alias that can't
play
chess, or do anything else with any degree of competance for that
matter.
Not only did this whining ninny back down from an OTB match, he
wouldn't
even play me online. I suppose that's because both of us know what the
result would be. You are a loser buddy, and you'll always be a loser.
You
have less significance in this world than a cockroach.

I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and out there, and part
of my email address! You know it as well as anyone here.

I backed down from no OTB match, I simply wasn't going to travel to
Canada based on your challenge - again, it seemed to me you were the
one with the point to prove especially since I outrate you by aprox
200 points, and you didn't make an offer to play on-line. That I would
have had to decline as my rheumatoid arthritis makes it impossible to
play chess well with quick time controls. I can only hold a rating of
2100-2200 (where I currently play - playchess.com) in quick time
controls as I simply can't move as fast as I used to.

But sure, travel here with the money you offered to play for (but not
those worthless Canadian $$), and I'll be happy to play a match with
you. Anytime, you just travel down here to play and its on. Now that
I am retired, I have a lot of time to play chess.

Steven B. "Less than a cockroach" Dowd

Now, let's wait for the angry, yet empty reply of the little boy Jason.

I would be happy to coordinate the match on chessworld.net. We could
even have the game annotated. All Jason has to do is sign up and agree
to play.
Rob

Internet corr. games is not "playing chess". It's computer & database vs
computer & database. Don't pretend like you don't already know that Rob.

There are two sites where cheating (in fast games) is not possible. ICC and
PlayChess. I would have played this coward SBD at EITHER of those sites, but
alas, he knows he's a weakling compared to me and would lose badly so he
backed right down as predicted.

Jason,
People who want to cheat are going to cheat. I never assume anyone I
am playing chess against is a cheater. If they beat me by themselves
then they are better than me. If they use a computer they have not
proven anything except they are cheaters. There is no dishonor in
losing to a better nor is there in losing to a cheater.The only
dishonor is in not competing.
Rob

The key point is that Dowd/Rynd have returned
to our forum, claiming a malady for the reason that
they are unable to play a chess match with Mr. Repa.

Larry, you never let the truth bother you, do you?

But at least you got your cheap shot of the day in. I bet it feels
good; doesn't it, little man?

OK, Jason, let's play on playchess.com then. I'll simply take a double
dose of my Celebrex to limber up the fingers.

"Rob" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Feb 17, 12:13 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

oups.com...



On Feb 16, 11:23 am, "SBD" wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:38 am, "Jason_911" wrote:

SBD is another pathetic crybaby who hides behind an alias that can't
play
chess, or do anything else with any degree of competance for that
matter.
Not only did this whining ninny back down from an OTB match, he
wouldn't
even play me online. I suppose that's because both of us know what
the
result would be. You are a loser buddy, and you'll always be a
loser.
You
have less significance in this world than a cockroach.

I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and out there, and part
of my email address! You know it as well as anyone here.

I backed down from no OTB match, I simply wasn't going to travel to
Canada based on your challenge - again, it seemed to me you were the
one with the point to prove especially since I outrate you by aprox
200 points, and you didn't make an offer to play on-line. That I would
have had to decline as my rheumatoid arthritis makes it impossible to
play chess well with quick time controls. I can only hold a rating of
2100-2200 (where I currently play - playchess.com) in quick time
controls as I simply can't move as fast as I used to.

But sure, travel here with the money you offered to play for (but not
those worthless Canadian $$), and I'll be happy to play a match with
you. Anytime, you just travel down here to play and its on. Now that
I am retired, I have a lot of time to play chess.

Steven B. "Less than a cockroach" Dowd

Now, let's wait for the angry, yet empty reply of the little boy
Jason.

I would be happy to coordinate the match on chessworld.net. We could
even have the game annotated. All Jason has to do is sign up and agree
to play.
Rob

Internet corr. games is not "playing chess". It's computer & database vs
computer & database. Don't pretend like you don't already know that Rob.

There are two sites where cheating (in fast games) is not possible. ICC
and
PlayChess. I would have played this coward SBD at EITHER of those sites,
but
alas, he knows he's a weakling compared to me and would lose badly so he
backed right down as predicted.

Jason,
People who want to cheat are going to cheat. I never assume anyone I
am playing chess against is a cheater. If they beat me by themselves
then they are better than me. If they use a computer they have not
proven anything except they are cheaters. There is no dishonor in
losing to a better nor is there in losing to a cheater.The only
dishonor is in not competing.
Rob



Whether you want to call it "being resourceful" or "cheating" is a matter of
semantics. The simple fact is that EVERYONE who gets a decent rating in
corr. chess uses both chess engine analysis and databases. If you refuse to
believe this, it's your problem. The fact still remains. Modern corr. chess
is a form of chess studying, not playing. You can learn alot from this form
of the game assuming you don't just mindlessly run the engine and database
reference but also are a knowledgeable player who thinks about the position
before using the computer assistance.

If you want to actually compete against another human who has to think for
himself you have to either play him (her) OTB, or fast games on a secure
online server such as Playchess or ICC. BTW, what's your OTB tournament
rating Rob?

JMR