On Feb 17, 10:09 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

oups.com...



On Feb 17, 3:12 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Feb 17, 2:03 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Feb 17, 12:13 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Feb 16, 11:23 am, "SBD" wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:38 am, "Jason_911"
wrote:

SBD is another pathetic crybaby who hides behind an alias that
can't
play
chess, or do anything else with any degree of competance for
that
matter.
Not only did this whining ninny back down from an OTB match,
he
wouldn't
even play me online. I suppose that's because both of us know
what
the
result would be. You are a loser buddy, and you'll always be a
loser.
You
have less significance in this world than a cockroach.

I have no alias, Jason, my name is well-known and out there, and
part
of my email address! You know it as well as anyone here.

I backed down from no OTB match, I simply wasn't going to travel
to
Canada based on your challenge - again, it seemed to me you were
the
one with the point to prove especially since I outrate you by
aprox
200 points, and you didn't make an offer to play on-line. That I
would
have had to decline as my rheumatoid arthritis makes it
impossible
to
play chess well with quick time controls. I can only hold a
rating
of
2100-2200 (where I currently play - playchess.com) in quick time
controls as I simply can't move as fast as I used to.

But sure, travel here with the money you offered to play for
(but
not
those worthless Canadian $$), and I'll be happy to play a match
with
you. Anytime, you just travel down here to play and its on. Now
that
I am retired, I have a lot of time to play chess.

Steven B. "Less than a cockroach" Dowd

Now, let's wait for the angry, yet empty reply of the little boy
Jason.

I would be happy to coordinate the match on chessworld.net. We
could
even have the game annotated. All Jason has to do is sign up and
agree
to play.
Rob

Internet corr. games is not "playing chess". It's computer &
database
vs
computer & database. Don't pretend like you don't already know that
Rob.

There are two sites where cheating (in fast games) is not possible.
ICC
and
PlayChess. I would have played this coward SBD at EITHER of those
sites,
but
alas, he knows he's a weakling compared to me and would lose badly
so
he
backed right down as predicted.

Jason,
People who want to cheat are going to cheat. I never assume anyone I
am playing chess against is a cheater. If they beat me by themselves
then they are better than me. If they use a computer they have not
proven anything except they are cheaters. There is no dishonor in
losing to a better nor is there in losing to a cheater.The only
dishonor is in not competing.
Rob

Whether you want to call it "being resourceful" or "cheating" is a
matter
of
semantics. The simple fact is that EVERYONE who gets a decent rating
in
corr. chess uses both chess engine analysis and databases. If you
refuse
to
believe this, it's your problem. The fact still remains. Modern corr.
chess
is a form of chess studying, not playing. You can learn alot from this
form
of the game assuming you don't just mindlessly run the engine and
database
reference but also are a knowledgeable player who thinks about the
position
before using the computer assistance.

If you want to actually compete against another human who has to think
for
himself you have to either play him (her) OTB, or fast games on a
secure
online server such as Playchess or ICC. BTW, what's your OTB
tournament
rating Rob?

JMR

My OTB rating is non-existant because I don't play OTB. My rating at
chessworld.net is currently 1425. Everyone doesn't cheat.

Learn how to read Rob. I didn't say "everyone" cheats. I said "everyone
with
a decent rating" in corr. chess uses both engine analysis and databases.
1425 is nowhere near "decent" in any interpretation of the word. I was
pretty clear in what I said. Were there any words you didn't understand
or
is this just a 1400 rated mentality of trying to "win" an argument?

This really isn't about your little philosophical opinions of what's
proper
etiquette to play corr. chess. I really couldn't care. You proposed that
this would be a good venue to settle a dispute about who the better
player
is and I spelled it out for you in a way a 5 year old could grasp why it
wouldn't. If you still don't understand you never will. Perhaps that
explains, at least in part, why you're a patzer.

I will play
anyone,anytime.

Sorry, I don't give free chess lessons to insolent 1425 rated weakies.

JMR

Like I said. I have nothing to prove with you or anyone else.

You're right. You've already proven that you're a moron! Nothing more needs
to be said.

Just so everyone knows. Jason ignored invitations from Steven Dowd on
playchess for a match. Jason has declined to play on chessworld.net
where everyone can see the game played and can determine first hand is
a program is being used.
Those who refuse to play stand upon weak ground. Quite simply, Jason
needs this attention because his poker sites are losing him money.
Makes one wonder what he will become when he grows up some day. On
second thought, Naw! We know what he will be. LOL
Rob

Rob, you're a complete ****ing loser is every way! Telling lies is not
going to get you any respect from me or anyone else. I'm not even going to
dignify any of the nonsense you've said.

I'm sorry that you lack the intelligence to play this wonderful game of
chess. Don't blame me.

Jason

Actually, YOU'RE the one telling lies you old geezer. I'm sitting at 2238
which indeed is between 2200-2300. But ratings aren't important. The
important thing is that you continuously back down from playing. I played
160 games yesterday and you were nowhere to be found under the name you
mentioned. You have no intention of playing because you know that you're
nowhere near being in my league. I'm a much stronger chess player than you,
and I was stronger than you even in your best days. Schachkomponist has
never been on the site. You're probably sneaking on with other account names
to do your rating research.

Give it up already Steven. Everyone knows you're a chicken **** and a
coward. There are many witnesses to confirm what i've said.

JMR

Your obsession with ratings explains why you haven't played
tournaments in more than 2 years Dowd. Even a brain-damaged senior
citizen, that should have been put out to pasture a few years back,
knows when he's lost whatever meagre ability he once had.

You were given opportunities to play all day yesterday. You certainly
had the time as you kept making posting after posting, generally
blabbing about your rating this or your rating that. Several people
asked you to the tune of a half dozen times what your playchess.com ID
is, but you wouldn't even acknoledge them. Finally, after you wasted
many hours whining about arthritis and making many other excuses why
you "can't" play, you make up a name that nobody has even seen on the
site.

The only delusional party here is you Dowd. Even an inbred Alabama
trailer park trash moron like you should have figured out a few things
by now. What is your excuse going to be for not playing today?

KC

"Jason_911" wrote in message
news:hs%Bh.1019957$1T2.371394@pd7urf2no...


Actually, YOU'RE the one telling lies you old geezer. I'm sitting at 2238
which indeed is between 2200-2300. But ratings aren't important. The
important thing is that you continuously back down from playing. I played
160 games yesterday and you were nowhere to be found under the name you
mentioned. You have no intention of playing because you know that you're
nowhere near being in my league. I'm a much stronger chess player than
you, and I was stronger than you even in your best days. Schachkomponist
has never been on the site. You're probably sneaking on with other account
names to do your rating research.

Give it up already Steven. Everyone knows you're a chicken **** and a
coward. There are many witnesses to confirm what i've said.

JMR

Dowd is a well known liar and troll. His entire life consists of posting
drivel on the internet. Don't waste your time with this guy.

Jeff

On Feb 18, 10:43 am, "Jason_911" wrote:
Rob, you're a complete ****ing loser is every way! Telling lies is not
going to get you any respect from me or anyone else. I'm not even going to
dignify any of the nonsense you've said.

I'm sorry that you lack the intelligence to play this wonderful game of
chess. Don't blame me.

Jason

LOL

you crack me up.

Why does a low IQ guy like you want to keep beating yourself over the head
when it's obvious you don't have the mental prerequisites for the game. Did
I use any words too difficult for you this time?

Jason

On Feb 18, 1:14 pm, "Jason_911" wrote:
Why does a low IQ guy like you want to keep beating yourself over the head
when it's obvious you don't have the mental prerequisites for the game. Did
I use any words too difficult for you this time?

Jason

LOL

You are too funny That remark cut me to the quick.
Take your time and think of some really good ones before you come back

On Feb 18, 5:44 am, "SBD" wrote:

Back to the delusional insultfest....

Steve, why are you bothering with these guys? They make Parr, Sloan
and Innes look like philosopher-kings.

Take your time and think of some really good ones


I don't need to think of "good ones" moron. I just state the facts.

Fact: You're a 1425 rated chess player

Fact: You're an extremely dumb and naive person that STILL doesn't
understand that internet corr. chess involves program use and databases,
even though it was explained to you in a way a child could grasp.

Fact: You have the English reading and writing skills of a high school
dropout who smokes drugs.

Now, let's hear some more lies and nonsense from the frustrated little boy
who calls himself "Rob".