![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: pgn, rgc, tournament |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 25, 4:34 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote: Mr. Repa is on playchess every day and offered to play Dowd, or whoever the half-retarded jackass who posts using his name is, numerous times and provided his playchess.com ID. The imbecile -- a creature which sometimes calls itself Jason Repa -- is back again, pretending to be someone else. Or perhaps it has accorded itself the third person, as a new way of differentiating itself from its many critics. Dowd backed down EVERY time and never provided HIS playchess.com ID. In all probability Dowd has already played Mr. Repa who has a 200+ higher rating than Dowd and lost very badly. In any event, Dowd has backed down and make it quite obvious that he won't play with an ID he owns up to having. Dowd is nothing more than a bull****ting little coward who's made excuses ranging from "arthritis", LMAO! to feeling it's "unlucky" to play on a weekend. Clearly, the creature is in denial; sometimes it seems willing to admit that old geezers can have arthritis, and yet sometimes it "forgets" this and claims the opposite. A more rational imbecile might simply grant that *if* the man is fairly old, he may indeed have arthritis, but add that it may well be just an excuse. I really shouldn't feed this jackass troll, and anyone more intelligent than a fruitfly Fruit fly is two words, Skippy. You can't seem to grasp anything, can you? This is undoubtedly the result of your lagging intellectual development, but I hope your chess therapy may have *some* remedial effect. would have understood that when Paul Keres and Ulf Andersson played corr. chess, it wasn't done on the internet, and there was no fritz to make the moves for them, so they actually did have to come up with the moves on their on. Finally, the imbecile makes a semi-rational point. Yet it is a flawed point, nonetheless. While it is true that GMs Keres and Andersson did not in the old days have the same opportunities to cheat that exist today, it nevertheless remains a fact that cheating was still possible, and indeed must have existed to some extent. One simple way to cheat would be to ask other players their opinions on one's more difficult positions, or even to make a habit of co-analysis -- which also happens to be an effective way to learn and improve. In truth, the only protection from being cheated is to play an opponent who is so strong, and so paranoid, and so stubborn, that he would never dream of showing his in-progress games to anyone, for fear that they might sell some tidbit of information to the "enemy". Well, it comes as no surprise to me that IQ boy has lashed out recklessly once again. Nor is his complete obsession with relative strengths at bullet-chess any surprise. Perhaps, if he becomes desperate enough, I may one day have the pleasure of losing to it, for I willingly admit that I have become very accustomed to playing the weak, the inept, and as a result I myself have become a bit lax, a bit careless -- and therefore vulnerable. Indeed, at GetClub I was so used to being able to recover from almost *any* error of judgment, that I somehow managed to actually fall into a mating net! By and large, my many victories are simply a series of fairly obvious (to me, at least) tactical blows, rendered one after another on a defenseless patzer, not unlike a boxing match where one fellow has his hands tied behind his back. But then, this probably will never happen, for if I know the creature, it will invariably insist that all playing sites are brimming with cheaters who, however, are all easily foiled by his favorite Web site's security measures. He will undoubtedly insist that I am far too weak a player to waste his valuable time on; and in the next breath, he will change tack and indicate that I must come to him, that I must stop my "cheating" immediately and come to his Web site, where all is green pastures and sun; where no one (two separate words, Skippy) can do wrong, and where most important, he rules as the only non- cheater left in the entire world. Delusional is a word which hardly does the poor creature justice. -- help bot |
| Ads |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 26, 3:24 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote: The 1300 retard named "help bitch" is incapable of discussing the actual issues, so he does what one would expect a dumb ape to do......focus on irrelevant details such as spelling/grammar. The creature so quickly forgets its own past criticisms of others in this area, does it? No surprise there. A *weak mind* always has these sorts of little problems. Every time you run your little spell check to try to get some "dirt" on someone, you just verify everything I've said about you all along. Which undoubtedly cannot be clearly remembered. LOL! PS, why is a moron that can't do better than a 1300 chess rating spending so much time in a chess Usenet? I'm baffled. One thing is su the GetClub site has made things VERY difficult insofar as making headway ratings wise. One trouble was the fact that the program was so slow, it often required weeks to finish even a single game vs. the higher levels! Yet another issue was the fact -- and this still applies -- that the higher one climbs, the slower and tougher the going gets, for all of the computer's different levels began at 1000 -- even Advanced! After players like Taylor Kingston and IM Innes and myself had beaten the many levels back to somewhere around 800, things got really tough. Can you imagine trying to go above 1300 while the computer is all the while getting stronger and stronger, yet actually FALLING in rating? For obvious reasons, the newcomers became fewer and fewer in number, and as they stopped "feeding" the computer easy points, it fell hard and fast. Long story short: at GetClub, a rating of 1300+ amounts to being the top-rated player on the site, and having beaten half to death any and all of the different levels of Sanny's hideous creation. Those who got in on the action early were the lucky ones, for they got to play a weaker program while it was still at or near its starting point of 1000 on each level. Me? I showed up late, and yes, I put up with it for far too long. Now I am over at RedHotPawn, where I was assigned a starting rating of 1200, and am slowly working my way higher. Things are much tougher at RedHot, or at least that is what I expect to find shortly. Yet so far, I am undefeated, with no draws. -- help bot |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 26, 9:20 pm, " wrote:
While Mr. Parr obsesses over this writer's person, he may wish to (finally) post his much talked about "analysis" on syntax and grammar; I for one would get a good laugh, and so might many others. That aside, one simply cannot help bot enjoy the way the man hides behind the skirts of a mere child -- a mental child, to be more precise. It seems convenient, for in this case the ranting emanates from someone who claims a bullet-chess rating in the same realms as inhabited by Mr. Parr's other attack dog, nearly-an-IM Innes. Now the fact that none of these attack dogs has any *real* titles or status makes little difference to a man of Larry Parr's standards, you understand. LOL Oh, well. One can always hope and dream about the possibility of a real attempt at analysis by syntax-guru Larry Parr. Much the same way as one can hope and dream about any and all such matters. I for one dream of playing bullet chess against him, and winning out due to my superior eye-hand coordination skill and faster reflexes, but it will never happen I know. And I dream of being rushed and pushed and shoved time-wise by Master Repa, then, with the simple delivery of but one powerful blow, rendering his massive time advantage useless, due to an impending checkmate. Yes, I have a dream... . -- help bot |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 26, 8:20 pm, " wrote:
"Some small satisfaction?" Mr. Repa has managed to make himself look good when matched against Bot and Rynd/Dowd. In truth, no great thing. Merely par for the curse. Wow, Larry, that is a crazy statement even for you. If the insults from Repa look good to you, even in comparison to me (I don't have the ego to think I am the same sort of hot shot you and Repa think you are) and bot, I suspect you are further gone than even most of us imagined. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 26, 8:05 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote: Dowd, I read your post. You keep repeating the same lies and nonsense over and over again like the retarded little automaton you are. I'm playing on Playchess right now. I'm willing to play 1, 2, or 3 minute games. You have all the time in the world to play as you're doing nothing but making your same old useless usenet postings, but no, you're going to back down like the pathetic, testosterone-deficient, snivelling little coward you are. Here is what puzzles me: if in fact the creature known as Jason Repa has no idea of the "real identity" of this SD poster, then why, oh why, does it mean so much to it that it may be able to quick-handedly out-click SD at bullet chess? This makes little sense to me; but then, I am not a frustrated, moronic teen-ager like the creature. Perhaps it feels it cannot tolerate the co-existence of another strong player here? Perhaps it is angry that another poster has made claims to be superior at chess? Perhaps it is just frustrated and confused, and at such times it has made a habit of lashing out by issuing forth challenges like these? Who knows. At any rate, for me the main interest would not lie in the ratings or the results, but in a careful examination of the ideas in the games -- which unfortunately, can never amount to anything under such conditions, such time controls and mouse-demolishing contests of lightening-fast reflexes and youthful energy. It is a bit disappointing when I think that the best that can come of this is a tiny sample for ratings comparison purposes. -- help bot |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
"help bot" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 26, 8:05 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!" wrote: Dowd, I read your post. You keep repeating the same lies and nonsense over and over again like the retarded little automaton you are. I'm playing on Playchess right now. I'm willing to play 1, 2, or 3 minute games. You have all the time in the world to play as you're doing nothing but making your same old useless usenet postings, but no, you're going to back down like the pathetic, testosterone-deficient, snivelling little coward you are. Here is what puzzles me: The challenge of getting your shoelaces tied in the morning puzzles a 1300 rated moron like you kennedy. At any rate, for me the main interest would not lie in the ratings or the results, but in a careful examination of the ideas in the games You're a 1300 rated MORON kid! You don't have the slightest clue about what an idea in the game of chess is. JMR |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
"SBD" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 26, 3:54 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!" wrote: He logged onto the site under a different ID just to check me out. This is an interesting contention you have made multiple times. It's not a contention. It's an obvious fact. On the Sunday a couple of weeks ago, when I was playing on Playchess all day, you were clearly at your computer all day as you kept making your usual retarded usenet postings, but the Playchess ID you gave was nowhere to be found on the server. Instead, you gleefully posted that my Playchess rating was just under the 2200-2300 that I said it was. Obviously, you snuck on with a name you didn't want anyone to know. Well now my rating is actually OVER 2300. You better tell everyone i'm full of it because my rating is outside of the range I said. This is how pathetic and desperate you are. You resort to lies and deception because you know you have no chance whatsoever in a chess match with me. Everyone and their dog knows you're a weakling and a coward and would never play me with a handle you own up to playing under. I'm asking you AGAIN to stop being a frightened little fruitcake and show up on Playchess to play. I'm on the server right now and will be for another hour or two. I can't wait to hear what your new excuse of the day will be. -Carpal tunnel syndrome? -Arthritis (AGAIN)? -Your Mommy won't let you play? Face it Dowd. EVERYONE knows you're an idiot that just keeps backing down from playing. Go back under the rock you came from loser. You're a completely worthless creature who gets not a shred of respect from anyone. JMR |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's truly hilarious to hear a 1300 rated imbecile like Kennedy, "help
bitch" bring up the subject of chess ratings when I'm 700 points higher rated. Kennedy, in your wildest wet dreams you couldn't be a 2000+ rated expert chess player as I am. You're a 1300 rated loser who lacks the intelligence to play the game of chess. And my apartment is actually quite nice, and it several classes up from the skid row trailer park that YOU live in. How many cocks does your mother have to suck to pay the lot rental each month? You're a frightened, testosterone-deficient little invertebrate without a shred of backbone or character. Why are you trolling about in a chess usenet group when you're clearly not a chess player? JMR |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're a 1300 rated MORON help bitch! Why do you troll about in a chess
usenet when you can't even play the game of chess? JMR |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
On the Sunday a couple of weeks
ago, when I was playing on Playchess all day, you were clearly at your computer all day as you kept making your usual retarded usenet postings, but the Playchess ID you gave was nowhere to be found on the server. Instead, you gleefully posted that my Playchess rating was just under the 2200-2300 that I said it was. Obviously, you snuck on with a name you didn't want anyone to know. Well now my rating is actually OVER 2300. You better tell everyone i'm full of it because my rating is outside of the range I said. This is how pathetic and desperate you are. You resort to lies and deception because you know you have no chance whatsoever in a chess match with me. Everyone and their dog knows you're a weakling and a coward and would never play me with a handle you own up to playing under. I'm asking you AGAIN to stop being a frightened little fruitcake and show up on Playchess to play. I'm on the server right now and will be for another hour or two. I can't wait to hear what your new excuse of the day will be. -Carpal tunnel syndrome? -Arthritis (AGAIN)? -Your Mommy won't let you play? Face it Dowd. EVERYONE knows you're an idiot that just keeps backing down from playing. Go back under the rock you came from loser. You're a completely worthless creature who gets not a shred of respect from anyone. JMR |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Los Angeles Open Chess Tournament | expochess07@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | January 31st 07 07:15 PM |
| Los Angeles Open Chess Tournament | expochess07@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | January 3rd 07 12:52 AM |
| Upcoming Los Angeles Open Chess Tournament | expochess07@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | September 26th 06 11:05 PM |
| Los Angeles Open Chess Tournament | expochess07@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | June 28th 06 10:50 PM |
| Los Angeles Open Chess Tournament | expochess07@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | March 29th 06 11:47 PM |