LOL!

He sure hit the nail on the head when he referred to help bitch as a
petulant whiner that hides behind various aliases.

On Feb 27, 2:54 am, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote:
You're a 1300 rated MORON help bitch! Why do you troll about in a chess
usenet when you can't even play the game of chess?

If he is Kennedy, as you assert, from the USCF MSA:

Current Published Rating

Regular Rating 2291
Quick Rating 2336

Hmm 300 points higher than you. Yeah, both him and I are real scared
of you.(sarcasm off) It's no wonder you keep ducking a match with me,
and when I try to contact you on playchess, you simply ignore the
message and continue to play your "wishful thinking" chess videogame.
Very, very sad, the venom you feel compelled to spew forth against
your betters. If you stopped and listened instead, you might learn
something. Come to think of it, that's wishful thinking too.

"SBD" wrote in message

Yeah, both him and I are real scared

You clearly are very scared Dowd. You've backed down from every invitation
to play and come up with a different lame excuse every day? You've never
once tried to contact me on Playchess. You're a liar! All you ever do is
cowardly sneak around under an ID you don't want anyone to know about hoping
to see my rating below 2200, if even for a moment, so that you can report
about it here. You're probably an 2000 player and you know as well as I do
that you would probably lose 10/10 games to me.

Let's hear it retard. Have you come up with some new material why you can't
play? Or is it going to be the same old excuses?

-Carpal tunnel syndrome?
-Arthritis?
-Your Mommy won't let you play?

On Feb 27, 1:01 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote:

Let's hear it retard. Have you come up with some new material why you can't
play? Or is it going to be the same old excuses?

Actually, I seem to be able to make new commentary, whereas yours
remains the same: scared, mommy, sneaking on, didn't message me, lost
badly to Mr. Repa, making fun of medical conditions, 1300-rated
retard, moron, testosterone-deficient, bitch, and so on. It seems your
ability to express yourself, both on the board and off, is severely
limited. That is why I suppose you should be pitied - you can't
express yourself without anger, and won't agree to a match arranged by
an arbiter (since all you can do is say NOT! every time I mention my
numerous attempts to contact you - a fifth grade strategy just to say
"did not" to everything) since you know you couldn't come up with some
lie in that instance.

That offer remains open, and we will see - in your own limited
vocabulary - who the "unich" from Munich is then - although that is
wishful thinking as you would never agree to a match where others
could see you lose. It is probably best that you continue to back away
from any attempt to play as I don't think your ego could take the
pounding. Once the chess puffery is lost, all you have is your
constant poker spamming to fall back on.

On Feb 27, 8:47 am, "SBD" wrote:
On Feb 27, 2:54 am, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"

wrote:
You're a 1300 rated MORON help bitch! Why do you troll about in a chess
usenet when you can't even play the game of chess?

If he is Kennedy, as you assert, from the USCF MSA:

Current Published Rating

Regular Rating 2291
Quick Rating 2336

Hmm 300 points higher than you.

Well, it seems the imbecile known as Jason Repa cannot
think clearly; for *if* I were indeed this player above, I could
hardly be a 1300 player as he maintains. My view is that
the imbecile simply "borrowed" the idea -- unexamined --
from his admirer, Larry "syntax expert" Parr. In truth, this
was not such a great leap, for let's face facts: the child
simply is incapable of any rational or intelligent evaluation
of his supporter's theory, involving as it does, the English
language. No, I say the creature might just as well adopt
whatever theories or fictions his admirer suggests, even
if that involves myriad contradictions of logic and reason.

At least that way, it may maintain a *real* friend, which is
better than just continuing to invent phantom identities with
which to post in praise of itself.


Very, very sad, the venom you feel compelled to spew forth against
your betters.

Ah, but there is no one else available.


Here are couple of facts for the creature to chew on:

At GetClub, it is true that I am only rated somewhere
around 1300, but then, that is the tip-top, and higher
than, for instance, Taylor Kingston, the last I checked.
I beat the living daylights out of Sanny's program, which
most likely *is* a 1300 (USCF) on some level or other.

At RedHotPawn, I am already up well into the 1500s,
having started recently at 1200 and won every single
game.

The idea that I am some master rated 2300 does not
coincide well with the suggestion that I am also a 1300.
The problem here is one of logic, in that one cannot be
two very different ratings -- and strengths -- at the *same
time*. How to explain this to an imbecile, I do not quite
know. I can only hope he checks it out with Larry Parr,
and is informed correctly; but then, LP has had many
similar difficulties with logic and reason. :(

In sum, the creature should either give up its mindless
aping of LP and decide for itself whether I am a true 1300
or some 2300-rated master, or it could begin to grasp the
idea that a 1300 rating on, say, GetClub, is in no way
equivalent to a 1300 USCF (or FIDE) rating. The latter
approach might require mental exertion, which I expect is
rather risky considering the creature's limited resources.

Of course, I freely admit that this is idle speculation on
my part, for no one here expects the creature to even
begin to grasp that his position is both untenable and
embarrassing to himself. Perhaps I will have to settle
for continuing to tutor it in the proper way of delivering
insults and the spewing forth of venom.

-- help bot

"SBD" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 27, 1:01 pm, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"
wrote:

Let's hear it retard. Have you come up with some new material why you
can't
play? Or is it going to be the same old excuses?

Actually, I seem to be able to make new commentary

Yeah, you made up some new lies, such as your bull**** about trying to
contact me on Playchess. I'll play along though.......what Playchess ID have
you been "trying to contact me" from? Get ready for Dowd's favourite
strategy everyone. He'll ignore my request for his Playchess ID, for about
10 requests or so, then he'll make up a name that you'll never see on the
server. We've been down this road before Dowd. Why don't you just own up to
being a weak little coward that never had any intention of playing. It's
already an obvious fact to pretty much everyone.

It's hillarious that you won't even acknowledge that fact that you're a
coward who's been dodging every attempt I've made to arrange a match. Out of
sight out of mind eh? It wasn't long ago you were whining about how
"arthritis" was the reason you couldn't play. After awhile even a complete
moron like you realized you weren't getting any miliage out of that nonsense
anymore, so you invented a Playchess ID and said you were willing to play,
even though that ID was nowhere to be found on the site. You're truly the
most pathetic little coward i've ever met Dowd. The problem with your lies
is that I actually play on Playchess pretty much ever day. Many posters from
this group see me there playing all the time. My current rating is just over
2300. You, on the other hand, are probably in the neighbourhood of
1700-2000. You know, as well as I do, that you would probably lose 10 out of
10 games to me.

Larry Parr was right about you. You're an snivelling little weasel that
forges people's names on the internet. I'd tell you to get a life, but it's
clear you've gone so long hiding from the real world that isn't possible
anymore.

JMR

We both know you're nowhere near 2300 help bitch. You're a 1300 rated loser
that spends all of your time hiding behind your computer and getting your
kicks being a usenet troll. You're choice of name is the real irony here.
You don't understand anything at all about chess, or anything else. The only
thing a guy with your very limited intellect is capable of doing is running
spellcheck, LOL! It was already obvious that you have no ability to think,
reason, or understand a concept more complex than right clicking, but your
latest diatribe on the merits of spelling, especially since Larry Parr
pointed out that you have a history of spelling errors yourself, sealed it.

JMR

On Feb 27, 1:42 pm, "help bot" wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:47 am, "SBD" wrote:

On Feb 27, 2:54 am, "Good Moves Aren't worth BEANS!"

wrote:
You're a 1300 rated MORON help bitch! Why do you troll about in a chess
usenet when you can't even play the game of chess?

If he is Kennedy, as you assert, from the USCF MSA:

Current Published Rating

Regular Rating 2291
Quick Rating 2336

Hmm 300 points higher than you.

Well, it seems the imbecile known as Jason Repa cannot
think clearly; for *if* I were indeed this player above, I could
hardly be a 1300 player as he maintains. My view is that
the imbecile simply "borrowed" the idea -- unexamined --
from his admirer, Larry "syntax expert" Parr. In truth, this
was not such a great leap, for let's face facts: the child
simply is incapable of any rational or intelligent evaluation
of his supporter's theory, involving as it does, the English
language. No, I say the creature might just as well adopt
whatever theories or fictions his admirer suggests, even
if that involves myriad contradictions of logic and reason.

At least that way, it may maintain a *real* friend, which is
better than just continuing to invent phantom identities with
which to post in praise of itself.

Very, very sad, the venom you feel compelled to spew forth against
your betters.

Ah, but there is no one else available.

Here are couple of facts for the creature to chew on:

At GetClub, it is true that I am only rated somewhere
around 1300, but then, that is the tip-top, and higher
than, for instance, Taylor Kingston, the last I checked.
I beat the living daylights out of Sanny's program, which
most likely *is* a 1300 (USCF) on some level or other.

At RedHotPawn, I am already up well into the 1500s,
having started recently at 1200 and won every single
game.

The idea that I am some master rated 2300 does not
coincide well with the suggestion that I am also a 1300.
The problem here is one of logic, in that one cannot be
two very different ratings -- and strengths -- at the *same
time*. How to explain this to an imbecile, I do not quite
know. I can only hope he checks it out with Larry Parr,
and is informed correctly; but then, LP has had many
similar difficulties with logic and reason. :(

In sum, the creature should either give up its mindless
aping of LP and decide for itself whether I am a true 1300
or some 2300-rated master, or it could begin to grasp the
idea that a 1300 rating on, say, GetClub, is in no way
equivalent to a 1300 USCF (or FIDE) rating. The latter
approach might require mental exertion, which I expect is
rather risky considering the creature's limited resources.

Of course, I freely admit that this is idle speculation on
my part, for no one here expects the creature to even
begin to grasp that his position is both untenable and
embarrassing to himself. Perhaps I will have to settle
for continuing to tutor it in the proper way of delivering
insults and the spewing forth of venom.

-- help bot

http://tinyurl.com/2worns

On Feb 27, 3:50 pm, "Rob" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/2worns

Jeesh, Rob, that's hilarious, especially since one of Repa's favorite
epithets to hurl at his many detractors over the years is that they
were "faggots." (ugh - I hated even typing that; prejudice isn't my
bag)

I've never had a bias towards the homosexual population, I served for
many years on the GLT (Gay Lesbian Transgendered) Advisory committee
at my university since, as you can imagine, they are the target of
much prejudice in Alabama, and although I am "straight" (not sure what
90% straight even means, it seems pretty binary to me), I always liked
helping the underdog. I've known quite a few gay/bi chessplayers as
well; most have had to hide it from the world, especially the chess
world, who seem to harbor as much, if not more prejudice than the
general population.

Jennifer Shahade's book "Chess Bitch" has a most interesting chapter
on a transgendered chess player; I believe Angelo knew one once as
well. I played the player in Jennifer's book in a game on an email
server; I was experimenting with the Sicilian - believe me, she knew
her stuff!

Repa seems to have nothing in his favor except for his own delusions,
which he shouts louder and louder, as if anyone believes them - well ,
Larry does, but he lost his connections with reality years ago.
Perhaps he will agree to the match if I put up Christina Aguilera
tickets as the prize?

The imbecile known as Jason Repa bleated:

We both know you're nowhere near 2300 help bitch. You're a 1300 rated loser
that spends all of your time hiding behind your computer and getting your
kicks being a usenet troll. You're choice of name is the real irony here.

Another English lesson presents itself.

The phrase "You're choice" is incorrect. You see, Creature,
the apostrophe merely represents the missing letter "a", and
this is what is called a contraction. What you wanted here
was another word, "your", which indicates possession. It is
obvious you did not really mean to suggest that I *am* a
choice of name, Skippy. Now run along home to Mommy.

You don't understand anything at all about chess, or anything else. The only
thing a guy with your very limited intellect is capable of doing is running
spellcheck, LOL!

Which buttons do I press? My browser keeps
auto-updating, and the many-fold options and
features seem to change with every passing day.
OTOH, dictionary.com seems to remain constant,
steady -- much like the stagnant intelligence of the
imbecile/creature itself. Just tell me how, and I will
gladly get the spell-checker you want, Skippy.


It was already obvious that you have no ability to think,
reason, or understand a concept more complex than right clicking,

Ah, finally a subject with which the creature is familiar!
The clicking of mice, the drag-and-drop, the speedy
transport across wide blue screens of chessmen, to be
deposited nearer to the enemy King! His bullet-skill is
renowned; his fame known far and wide.


but your
latest diatribe on the merits of spelling, especially since Larry Parr
pointed out that you have a history of spelling errors yourself, sealed it.

Is this the same fellow who worships at your feet?
Who loudly proclaims to have undertaken a study
of syntax and grammars, yet never publishes his many
secrets? Who hides behind the skirts of little boys,
and who protects his deep-studied findings on syntax
and spelling such that no scholar may ever bear a
critical eye? I thought it was him. I could almost
smell his omni-presence among us; his elegant odor
of arrogance and fluff; his whispering pretensions to
learning; his floundering attempts at logic and thought.
Yes, this can only be him, for there is no other a match
to his omnipotent aroma. Alas, we are blessed with
the presence of true greatness -- if only in girth and
arrogance.

All that aside, I am truly happy that the creature has
*finally* managed to find someone, a companion not
unworthy of its vast intellectual capabilities, of its kind
demeanor. This is a great day indeed; a day to be
celebrated and long remembered. A small step for man,
yet a giant leap for creature-kind!

-- coach bot