Sloan promotes Pokemon porn to lure innocent children to his site.

It is beginning to seem that judgementday @ clerk.com might be Bill
Brock.

On 21 Mar 2007 03:01:14 -0700, "samsloan" wrote:

It is beginning to seem that judgementday @ clerk.com might be Bill
Brock.

Or someone that wants people to *think* he's Bill Brock.

On Mar 21, 11:22 am, Mike Murray wrote:
On 21 Mar 2007 03:01:14 -0700, "samsloan" wrote:

It is beginning to seem that judgementday @ clerk.com might be Bill
Brock.

Or someone that wants people to *think* he's BillBrock.

One suspects that Bill Brock, were he to resume posting here, would
present such material as the following:

On Mar 21, 9:39 pm, wrote:
On Mar 21, 11:22 am, Mike Murray wrote:

On 21 Mar 2007 03:01:14 -0700, "samsloan" wrote:

It is beginning to seem that judgementday @ clerk.com might be Bill
Brock.

Or someone that wants people to *think* he's BillBrock.

One suspects that BillBrock, were he to resume posting here, would
present such material as the following:

Oopsies.

Second try (deleted from the USCF Issues Forum earlier today):

http://www.billbrock.net/chess/Forum...wtopic.php.htm

To my email program it doesn't matter any longer who he is, if you catch my
drift.


"samsloan" wrote in message
ups.com...
It seems obvious that judgementday @ clerk.com is the same person as
the Fake Sam Sloan. The posting pattern is the same. The writing style
is similar. For example, both post so much that they clog up the
rec.games.chess.politics forum so that all others are discouraged from
posting.

However, I am not convinced that they are both the same person.

Also, there are two Fake Sam Sloans. One posts from ismailsloan @
gmail.com . The other posts from samsloan @ usa.com

I believe that those two are the same person, but I am not sure of
that either.

Any ideas or opinions on this?

The Real Sam Sloan

To say it is Bill Brock is a really wild theory. You can think what
you want of Bill, but he has, in Phil Innes' phrase, always stood up
and owned his own words. The "judgment" fellow seems to have picked up
on much of what Bill has said, and is simply using it.

On Mar 22, 4:26 pm, "SBD" wrote:
To say it is Bill Brock is a really wild theory. You can think what
you want of Bill, but he has, in Phil Innes' phrase, always stood up
and owned his own words. [...]

What about this metrically lame parody, allegedly authored by yours
tr.., er, by Brock, yet published on RGCP under the name of another?

Les sanglots longs
Des salauds avares
Du Vermont
Blessent mon coeur
D'une langueur
Monotone.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 22, 4:26 pm, "SBD" wrote:
To say it is Bill Brock is a really wild theory. You can think what
you want of Bill, but he has, in Phil Innes' phrase, always stood up
and owned his own words. [...]

What about this metrically lame parody, allegedly authored by yours
tr.., er, by Brock, yet published on RGCP under the name of another?

Les sanglots longs
Des salauds avares
Du Vermont
Blessent mon coeur
D'une langueur
Monotone.

Well, what about it? Its cod-French.

Surely you blokes also sorted out the anagram of the title? His own for
himself.

It is no mere anagram, it is his own prediction of himself - that he will
become famous and successful, and empty and [artistically] dead. His friend
Rimbaud took an admittedly radical alternate course.

I could else who wrote the ditties above, surely there isn't much doubt to
the nature of the imposters here [?] which is all of a pattern - derivative
mockery and beshat commentary ~ Victoriana!

I suppose 'objective' proofs of outer identity are necessary for those who
feel they are sufficiently abused to wish to prosecute. Whereas its
ontogenesis is well marked from a psychological perspective, indeed, so well
so it is predicatble to a pattern.

Phil Innes

On Apr 4, 7:17 am, "Chess One" wrote:

[...]


Surely you blokes also sorted out the anagram of the title? His own for
himself.

It is no mere anagram, it is his own prediction of himself - that he will
become famous and successful, and empty and [artistically] dead. His friend
Rimbaud took an admittedly radical alternate course.

Once again, you're obsessing too much about a gay couple's rather
melodramatic relationship. Stop projecting ;-)

But seriously, thx for coming around (to the extent possible) re
Sloan.

"Do the watusi" -- Patti Smith