![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: forums, rules, unwritten, uscf |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would like to point out that in the above posting John Hillary uses
the word "lied" three times and the word "lie" once. Yet, there words are supposedly banned from this forum. I am not really complaining because I am opposed to censorship and besides every regular reader of this group knows that John Hillary hates me and has been attacking me for years, even though I have never met him and have no idea why he always attacks me. The point here is the double standard. Everybody knows that it is forbidden on this forum to post anything of an even vaguely negative nature about Polgar or Truong. Anybody who does so will have the entire thread pulled. You do not have to use any cuss words or accuse them of any impropriety. All you have to do is vaguely suggest that they might not be suitable candidates for sainthood and not only will your remarks be deleted but the entire thread will be locked or pulled and you might even be suspended or banned from posting to this forum. On the other hand, you can say as many bad things about Sam Sloan as you want and not only will your posting not be deleted but you might be rewarded for your valor. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
samsloan schrieb:
I would like to point out that in the above posting John Hillary uses the word "lied" three times and the word "lie" once. Nem tunt fel eddig, hogy ez egy magyar forum lenne? Yet, there words are supposedly banned from this forum. I am not really complaining because I am opposed to censorship and besides every regular reader of this group knows that John Hillary hates me and has been attacking me for years, even though I have never met him and have no idea why he always attacks me. The point here is the double standard. Everybody knows that it is forbidden on this forum to post anything of an even vaguely negative nature about Polgar or Truong. Anybody who does so will have the entire thread pulled. You do not have to use any cuss words or accuse them of any impropriety. All you have to do is vaguely suggest that they might not be suitable candidates for sainthood and not only will your remarks be deleted but the entire thread will be locked or pulled and you might even be suspended or banned from posting to this forum. On the other hand, you can say as many bad things about Sam Sloan as you want and not only will your posting not be deleted but you might be rewarded for your valor. Sam Sloan |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes Hillery called me stupid and just to see what the reaction would be i
complained about. As I expected, his post was not deleted but the moderators retaliated by deleting some of mine. For example, moderator4 claimed that when I told Joel Channing that his idea for changing the forum rules would not work that was off topic so he deleted two of my messages. One actually had been posted there for over a week so I'm sure it was purely retalitatory action on the part of Channing and moderator4. He mentioned that Channing had complained so I know it was him. "arcor" wrote in message ... samsloan schrieb: I would like to point out that in the above posting John Hillary uses the word "lied" three times and the word "lie" once. Nem tunt fel eddig, hogy ez egy magyar forum lenne? Yet, there words are supposedly banned from this forum. I am not really complaining because I am opposed to censorship and besides every regular reader of this group knows that John Hillary hates me and has been attacking me for years, even though I have never met him and have no idea why he always attacks me. The point here is the double standard. Everybody knows that it is forbidden on this forum to post anything of an even vaguely negative nature about Polgar or Truong. Anybody who does so will have the entire thread pulled. You do not have to use any cuss words or accuse them of any impropriety. All you have to do is vaguely suggest that they might not be suitable candidates for sainthood and not only will your remarks be deleted but the entire thread will be locked or pulled and you might even be suspended or banned from posting to this forum. On the other hand, you can say as many bad things about Sam Sloan as you want and not only will your posting not be deleted but you might be rewarded for your valor. Sam Sloan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes Hillery called me stupid and just to see what the reaction would be i complained about. As I expected, his post was not deleted but the moderators retaliated by deleting some of mine. Please try to understand that the soc.culture.magyar is not moderated. Such postst like yours shows clearly how immoral and despicable is the crossponting. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 26 Mar, 14:25, "Todd" wrote:
Yes Hillery called me stupid and just to see what the reaction would be i complained about. *As I expected, his post was not deleted but the moderators retaliated by deleting some of mine. *For example, moderator4 claimed that when I told Joel Channing that his idea for changing the forum rules would not work that was off topic so he deleted two of my messages. One actually had been posted there for over a week so I'm sure it was purely retalitatory action on the part of Channing and moderator4. *He mentioned that Channing had complained so I know it was him. "arcor" wrote in message ... samsloan schrieb: I would like to point out that in the above posting John Hillary uses the word "lied" three times and the word "lie" once. Nem tunt fel eddig, hogy ez egy magyar forum lenne? Yet, there words are supposedly banned from this forum. I am not really complaining because I am opposed to censorship and besides every regular reader of this group knows that John Hillary hates me and has been attacking me for years, even though I have never met him and have no idea why he always attacks me. The point here is the double standard. Everybody knows that it is forbidden on this forum to post anything of an even vaguely negative nature about Polgar or Truong. Anybody who does so will have the entire thread pulled. You do not have to use any cuss words or accuse them of any impropriety. All you have to do is vaguely suggest that they might not be suitable candidates for sainthood and not only will your remarks be deleted but the entire thread will be locked or pulled and you might even be suspended or banned from posting to this forum. On the other hand, you can say as many bad things about Sam Sloan as you want and not only will your posting not be deleted but you might be rewarded for your valor. Sam Sloan- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because you're stupid. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| $am $loan for USCF Executive Board | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 12 | May 2nd 06 09:24 PM |
| $am $loan for USCF Executive Board | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 10 | May 2nd 06 03:18 AM |
| Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 9 | March 30th 06 12:52 AM |
| Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? | Sam Sloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 9 | March 30th 06 12:52 AM |
| Should the USCF rate the Olympiads? | Sam Sloan | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 9 | March 30th 06 12:52 AM |