A Chess forum. ChessBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ChessBanter forum » Chess Newsgroups » rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Mystery of Innes' Bogus Statistics Solved



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old March 30th 07, 06:31 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,950
Default Innes is definitely *not* OK

On Mar 29, 9:14 am, "Taylor Kingston"
wrote:
On Mar 28, 11:27 pm, "help bot" wrote:

Does [Kingston] even like the Beach Boys?


Very much so. I grew up in southern California. "Pet Sounds": in
some ways, an album worthy of Mozart.

I took
'im for a Country kind of guy, like maybe
Johnny Cash or somphin like that.


Ol' John was great, but country's not really my bag.

No, I
think it was Crystal Gayle


I could not name even one of her songs.


That sure makes my brown eyes turn blue. :(


-- or was it the

Talking Heads?


Now you're talking -- "More Songs about Buildings and Food," "Fear
of Music," "Remain in Light," "Stop Making Sense," "Little Creatures"
-- great albums.


Um, you -- yeah you, a way up there in your
tower: IM Innes was a talkin' about someone
he calls "kenedy", which he seems to have
confused with me. (What he doesn't know is
this: I ain't never played 1c4, so how kin I be a
guy who ain't never played nuthin' but c4? Duh!)

We was a spekulatin' as ta what sort o' music
that feller liked, not you, the tower guy. It's
kinda like shootin' in the dark, and just about
as productive, too. :D

Of course, the nearly-insane Innes never dared
to say what sort of music *he* liked, preferring
instead to spek-a-late about somphin' he knows
nuphin' 'bout, as usual.

-- help bot





Ads
  #42  
Old March 30th 07, 06:34 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,950
Default Innes is definitely *not* OK

On Mar 29, 9:25 am, "Chess One" wrote:


-- many (ad hominem) words, signifying nothing.

-- help bot

  #43  
Old March 30th 07, 06:42 AM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
help bot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,950
Default No Mystery in Kennedy's understanding

On Mar 29, 10:54 pm, michael adams wrote:

I reckon they might be a tad more "interesting"
to them what don't care much fer a rational
approach to the issue, a purely objective style
of tackling it. Anyhow, I suspect the players
who have an irrational problem of losing with
Black too often are the ones drawn to such a
title most strongly. Me, I can lose just as
easily with any color, if I put a mind to it.


It's inneresting bot, sorry, INTERESTING ( I've heard the French
habitually cogitate the adverb/adjective 'interesting' to mean boring -
what a perverse viewpoint - no?) For myself, I have to report my results
with black (playing on the icc server) are nothing short of astonishing
in my view. Maybe this has to do with the blackwatch beatle, the black
death, the black dog, the gross all black thug team stretching their
collective hamstrings in preparation for dominance. I dunno?!..


I would like to report on my own results with
either color, but so far I have only two games
at RedHot which were not easy wins, and the
ones at GetClubbed can basically all be
considered freaks, on account of the inhuman
playing conditions there. In essence, it is a
question of attitude: do you play with an
attitude "try to win" with White, but a very
different one with Black? In OTB play the
question of prize money may arise, and here
some players (but not all) may take the
approach of trying to push for the full point
when they perceive themselves as having
the best chances, in other words with the
White pieces. But the truth is that their
opponent may actually do better as Black,
having studied a few of those books which
do a superb job from the Black perspective.


-- help bot




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chess Politics Chess Heretics Chess One rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 28 December 24th 06 04:36 AM
Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 443 June 11th 06 10:30 AM
Keene reviews Kingston (part 1) parrthenon@cs.com rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 445 June 11th 06 10:30 AM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) 160 January 10th 06 02:25 PM
Why are the Hardinge-Simpole titles priced the way they are? Sam Sloan rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) 163 January 10th 06 02:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 ChessBanter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Free Credit Report - Myspace Images - Myspace Proxy - Loans - Debt Consolidation