Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

The retard is so dumb, he thinks his rating is "average". ROFL!!


This useless troll has lost pretty much every rated chess game he's every
played. Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

On Mar 22, 8:39 pm, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
wrote:
Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess ratinghttp://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

The retard is so dumb, he thinks his rating is "average". ROFL!!

This useless troll has lost pretty much every rated chess game he's every
played. Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't make
in a bullet game time scramble.


Skippy, is this the *worst* game you can find?
Really? I want a *slow time control* game where
it looks like two six year olds are cluelessly
shifting wood around the board. Come on -- show
us your research skills in all their glory; find the
very worst games your hecklers have ever played
online, and report back with the results.

-- coach bot

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

The retard is so dumb, he thinks his rating is "average". ROFL!!


This useless troll has lost pretty much every rated chess game he's
every
played. Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

On Mar 22, 9:09 pm, "Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!"
wrote:

--snip--

My imbecile student, Jason Repa, has been off his
meds lately, and can do no better than mindlessly
repeat his earlier postings, again and again. If only
he would follow the doctor's orders, then his brain
would not be deprived of much-needed nutrients... .

--------------

Does anyone have a link to a site where the actual
average USCF rating can be found? I had a quick
look at the USCF Web site, but found little in this
particular area. Then I did a quick search on Indiana
chess and got a few crosstables, but nothing like an
average rating number. (Darn if Emory Tate did not
win the state championship again! Several of the
players I once knew are still around, and their ratings
have gone nowhere or else have dropped fifty points.)
Well, really what I want is an average rating which
excludes the kiddies under 12.

On another subject, I recently lost a game I was
winning at RedHotPawn. Sitting in my vehicle, I
forced myself to make a move in a complex position
and ended up tossing away the initiative, among
other things. Shortly thereafter, I found myself on
the defensive, and in attempting to avoid zero
winning chances I willingly went into a Rook
ending which *appeared* double-edged, but in fact
was dead lost for me! Had I looked this over on an
analysis board the way you do in correspondence
play this probably would never have happened.
That is my second loss on RedHot -- uugh. Years
ago, I was quite an expert of Rook endings, but
apparently no more... .

-- help bot

Help-Bitch is a usenet troll, a snivelling coward who hides behind
various aliases, and complete imbecile who isn't even a
chess player. His big claim to fame is his moderate success at
computer-assisted corr. games on RedHotPawn where he just does what
his
fritz tells him to.




Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557


Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.


JMR

Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 = 0 = 1 1 4.0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 = X X 1 = 1 = 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 = 0 = X X 0 = 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 = 1 = X X
2.0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Yeah, this "horrible player" is an Expert Class 2024 cfc rated tournament
player with a 2314 playchess.com bullet rating. I'm such a terrible player,
why do I even bother?

The retard calling me "horrible" is a Low IQ, 1400 player named Rob Mitchell
aka Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, etc.

How's that for IRONY!!!





Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

This guy is so dumb, he thinks his rating is "average". ROFL!!


This useless troll has lost pretty much every rated chess game he's every
played. Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

On Mar 23, 1:07 am, "Good Moves are worth BEANS!"
wrote:
Yeah,Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 = 0 = 1 1 4.0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 = X X 1 = 1 = 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 = 0 = X X 0 = 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 = 1 = X X
2.0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD. There is also a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

On Mar 23, 8:06 am, "Good Moves Are Worth BEANS!"
wrote:
There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD. There is also a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth,


I can vouch for this; Skippy is ALWAYS fighting
with the facts! LOL

And of course his inability to differentiate between
various posters here can be written off to his lack of
mental capacity, much like several others here.

---------------------------------

On another matter, the great master Rob Mitchell
wrote that Skippy stacked his tournaments with
what he called "weaker rated players". This is not
true. Although they were rated chess players, they
can hardly be described as "weaker" in relation to
Skip. For instance, take a look at Sam Cleto -- he
*trounced* Skippy, and this is not the only time,
either.

In fact, if you visit the CFC Web site you will find
that Skippy quite often has grave difficulties when it
comes to playing REAL chess -- that is, not just
the mindless bullet chess where all that matters is
hand speed. Still, he's not bad player; perhaps a
Class A strength player apart from bullet chess,
which would put him at the 100th percentile among
his peers, the other pathetic imbeciles at Winterpeg
Sanitarium. And even measured against "normal"
people, the Class A level is at what -- the 90th
percentile? No, Skippy is actually quite good at
chess, if nothing else.

Oh, and at beating the other inmates up. We
caretakers often utilize this to our own advantage.
For instance, imagine a situation where one of the
inmates pesters and goads us deliberately, knowing
full well that we cannot touch him under pain of
losing one's job. No problemo: just buy Skippy a
candy bar or a beer and tell him that in return, a
certain inmate needs to be "taught a lesson".
(Not that this has ever happened, you
understand; I'm just saying that it is possible, in
theory. Of course, this would probably be illegal
and so I am definitely against it. No one should
ever stoop this low, and it is a clear violation of
the sanitarium's written policies. Forget I even
mentioned it.)


-- coach bot