-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

Yeah, that's Brian Lafferty, ESQ

"Larry P." schreef in bericht
ups.com...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

How about them ulcers, a?

"Ruud" schreef in bericht
...

"Larry P." schreef in bericht
ups.com...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

How about them ulcers, a?

Don't you just love 'em?

On 23 Mar, 10:15, wrote:
Yeah, that's Brian Lafferty, ESQ

On Mar 23, 9:54 am, "Ruud" wrote:
"Ruud" schreef in .. .


How about them ulcers, a?

Don't you just love 'em?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Mar 23, 12:58 pm, "Skippy Repa" wrote:


Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-----

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 = 0 = 1 1
4.0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 = X X 1 = 1 = 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 = 0 = X X 0 = 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 = 1 = X X=
2.0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead
last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Most interesting is the fact that he only made Expert because the CFC
added one point per game to each player's rating under 2200 active
from 2004-2006 - else he would still be a lowly A player. According
to
the CFC, some players gained as many as 200 points from this rather
dubious sounding adjustment.

I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits

On Mar 23, 9:54 am, "Ruud" wrote:
"Ruud" schreef in .. .
On Mar 23, 12:58 pm, "Skippy Repa" wrote:


Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-----

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 = 0 = 1 1
4.0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 = X X 1 = 1 = 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 = 0 = X X 0 = 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 = 1 = X X=
2.0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead
last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Most interesting is the fact that he only made Expert because the CFC
added one point per game to each player's rating under 2200 active
from 2004-2006 - else he would still be a lowly A player. According
to
the CFC, some players gained as many as 200 points from this rather
dubious sounding adjustment.

I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits

Jason 'The Grim' Repa also claimed FICS was inferior to whatever
internet server he played on. After challenging him to play at
FICS, Repa ended up with a 1600 rating and a 50-50 score. Yup,
he sucks at chess.


"Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 23, 9:54 am, "Ruud" wrote:
"Ruud" schreef in
.. .
On Mar 23, 12:58 pm, "Skippy Repa" wrote:


Bi curious Jason Repa is a failure and a horrible chess player

Results from "Skippy's" Tournament.... a Classic? LOL

Jason Repa Classic

[ Home ] [ Crosstables ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-----

Tournament Director Jason Repa Finish Date 2004/3/28
Tournament # 200405008 Province MB

# Name Old Perf New High
Results Tot
1
Cleto, Sam 1888 2074 1933 1992 X X 1 = 0 = 1 1
4.0

2
Zaczek, Jonathon 1876 2011 1918 1918 0 = X X 1 = 1 = 3.5

3
Van Wyk, Joseph 1954 1852 1928 1954 1 = 0 = X X 0 = 2.5

4
Repa, Jason 1992 1773 1 938 1992 0 0 0 = 1 = X X=
2.0

Notice how he tried to "stack" his tournament with weaker rated
players at the start of the Jason Repa Classic? He finished dead
last
in a tournament he attempted to stack in his favor.

LOL What a joke!

Rob

Most interesting is the fact that he only made Expert because the CFC
added one point per game to each player's rating under 2200 active
from 2004-2006 - else he would still be a lowly A player. According
to
the CFC, some players gained as many as 200 points from this rather
dubious sounding adjustment.

I understand that "Skippy" Repa is so dumb he thinks "Homo Erectus"
refers to his "Bi Curious" dating habits

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD aka other aliases. There is also
a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR

There is a reason you're a 1400 chess player Rob Mitchell, aka
Help-Bitch aka No More Chess, aka SBD aka other aliases. There is also
a reason you
don't sign
your posts with your real name,
but instead hide behind a potpourri of aliases like the snivelling,
frightened little cowardly eunuch you are. The beauty of this
situation is that I fight with 100% facts and truth, and everyone with
a brain reading this knows it....and you fight with 100% lies and
nonsense. Also, it doesn't take a shrink to see that this idiot is
talking about himself with his chronic mention of being "bi-curious".
One would expect someone who's too cowardly to post under his real
name is in all likelyhood a homo, so it's not surprising.

Inconnux = Jason Lohner = Fetal Alcohol effects baby = 1311 chess
rating
http://www.chess.ca/memberinfo.asp?CFCN=144557

Here he loses to someone even LOWER rated than he is:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_ches..._vs_Retard.htm

And check out this game:
http://members.shaw.ca/winnipeg_chess/1300_Jamboree.htm
Notice the obvious blunder on move 35 that a blind inebriate wouldn't
make
in a bullet game time scramble.

JMR