"Ralf Callenberg" wrote in message
...
02.04.2007 08:55, I was better but.....:

Terry, you're an idiot that knows nothing at all about chess. You don't
even know what algebraic notation is.

The position is far from "trivial".

The positon is obviously trivial due to the extra knight

The only thing that is obvious here is that you don't know anything about
chess Ralf. You're probably a weak class player. Morons like you always like
to run around and claim you understand a position but you don't. That's why
you're a weak class player and will never make it to expert or master. If
you think this position is simple, you truly are a know-nothing patzer. It's
not simple at all. And for your information, most positions with Rook and
Knight vs Rook are dead drawn. Many with Rook, Knigh, and Pawn vs Rook are
dead drawn as well. Shut up, watch, listen, and learn Ralf. You don't know
anything.

"Ron" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Ralf Callenberg wrote:

You seem to have a limited experience in tournament play, if you really
think, that advanced players won't describe a plan without using
algebraic notations.

Actually, the reality is, only a moron would not understand enough to use
notation. That's totally obvious. There is a reason notation was invented.
It facilitates unambiguous communication of chess games and positions.

And I'd beat you 100% of the games at any time control "Ron". If you can't
even understand why chess notation is useful and important, you obviously
are not a chess player at all.

"Ralf Callenberg" wrote in message
...
02.04.2007 08:55, I was better but.....:

Terry, you're an idiot that knows nothing at all about chess. You don't
even know what algebraic notation is.

The position is far from "trivial".

The positon is obviously trivial due to the extra knight and any decent
tournament player should instantly see, how to win this, as one just has
to follow some basic recipes even a beginner should know. If you follow
the posted link to the Namilov tablebase, you can indeed easily see, that
this is exactly the fastest way to win: "put the rook behind the pawn and
move the king over". One might add: king and rook can never stop the pawn
as the knight can always control the sqaure in front of the pawn.

You seem to have a limited experience in tournament play, if you really
think, that advanced players won't describe a plan without using algebraic
notations.

Ralf

I play in about 10 otb tournaments a year including 2 fide rated.
I saw no point in using any notation as mine was a general way of winning
in this type of position.

Regards

"I was better but....." wrote in message
news:yAgQh.18065$6m4.12267@pd7urf1no...

"Ralf Callenberg" wrote in message
...
02.04.2007 08:55, I was better but.....:

Terry, you're an idiot that knows nothing at all about chess. You don't
even know what algebraic notation is.

The position is far from "trivial".

The positon is obviously trivial due to the extra knight

The only thing that is obvious here is that you don't know anything about
chess Ralf. You're probably a weak class player. Morons like you always
like to run around and claim you understand a position but you don't.
That's why you're a weak class player and will never make it to expert or
master. If you think this position is simple, you truly are a know-nothing
patzer. It's not simple at all. And for your information, most positions
with Rook and Knight vs Rook are dead drawn. Many with Rook, Knigh, and
Pawn vs Rook are dead drawn as well. Shut up, watch, listen, and learn
Ralf. You don't know anything.




Who is this ****** ???

"Terry" wrote in message
...

"I was better but....." wrote in message
news:yAgQh.18065$6m4.12267@pd7urf1no...

"Ralf Callenberg" wrote in message
...
02.04.2007 08:55, I was better but.....:

Terry, you're an idiot that knows nothing at all about chess. You don't
even know what algebraic notation is.

The position is far from "trivial".

The positon is obviously trivial due to the extra knight

The only thing that is obvious here is that you don't know anything about
chess Ralf. You're probably a weak class player. Morons like you always
like to run around and claim you understand a position but you don't.
That's why you're a weak class player and will never make it to expert or
master. If you think this position is simple, you truly are a
know-nothing patzer. It's not simple at all. And for your information,
most positions with Rook and Knight vs Rook are dead drawn. Many with
Rook, Knigh, and Pawn vs Rook are dead drawn as well. Shut up, watch,
listen, and learn Ralf. You don't know anything.




Who is this ****** ???

Someone alot stronger and more knowledgeable about chess, and many other
areas than your peabrain will ever allow you to be. Seriously idiot, if you
don't even know what chess notation is (descriptive and algebraic) and why
it's what real chess players use to communicate moves and positions, you're
totally hopeless.

"Terry" wrote in message
...

"Ralf Callenberg" wrote in message
...
02.04.2007 08:55, I was better but.....:

Terry, you're an idiot that knows nothing at all about chess. You don't
even know what algebraic notation is.

The position is far from "trivial".

The positon is obviously trivial due to the extra knight and any decent
tournament player should instantly see, how to win this, as one just has
to follow some basic recipes even a beginner should know. If you follow
the posted link to the Namilov tablebase, you can indeed easily see, that
this is exactly the fastest way to win: "put the rook behind the pawn and
move the king over". One might add: king and rook can never stop the pawn
as the knight can always control the sqaure in front of the pawn.

You seem to have a limited experience in tournament play, if you really
think, that advanced players won't describe a plan without using
algebraic notations.

Ralf

I play in about 10 otb tournaments a year

You can play in all the tournaments you like idiot. Alot of weak patzers
like yourself like to push wood. You keep getting your brains bashed in
because you're too stupid to learn how to play this game, but you continue
to enter tournaments nonetheless.

Seriously buddy, if you don't even know what chess notation is (descriptive
and algebraic) and why it's what real chess players use to communicate moves
and positions, you're totally hopeless. Keep your mouth (keyboard) shut and
your eyes open and even a dumb guy like you might just learn something.

On 3 Apr., 08:56, "Terry" wrote:

Who is this ****** ???

Jason Repa. He has got a (Canadian) rating of about 2000 and thinks
this makes him something like a chess god (an angry one, that is). And
as you might have guessed in the meantime: he has some weak spots in
communicating with other persons.

Greetings,
Ralf

" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 3 Apr., 08:56, "Terry" wrote:

Who is this ****** ???

Jason Repa. He has got a (Canadian) rating of about 2000 and thinks
this makes him something like a chess god (an angry one, that is). And
as you might have guessed in the meantime: he has some weak spots in
communicating with other persons.

Greetings,
Ralf



Thanks for the info :-)

He cant be as strong as you say. He fails to see that the position under
consideration is a trivial win. Even a 1200 can see that.

Regards

" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 3 Apr., 08:56, "Terry" wrote:

Who is this ****** ???

Jason Repa. He has got a (Canadian) rating of about 2000 and thinks
this makes him something like a chess god

It's God, imbecile. Not "god". And my 2000+ rating is what it is. YOU on the
other hand "Ralf" are a 1500 rated IDIOT and you will NEVER be anywhere near
2000. You don't have the mental prerequisites for the game.

Terry you retarded little cretin troll. Only weak players like yourself are
quick to make assumptions about positions, as you have done. This position
is far from trivia. It's complex enough that even Rybka 2.3 and Fritz 10 are
way off on the assessment, unless they are run for some time. You're a weak,
dumb, know-nothing 130 bcf player Terry. You are not in a position to be
making sweeping comments when you can't back them up on the board. Chess is
a game of skill. There is a reason your rating is so low idiot!