On Apr 18, 4:07 am, Sanny wrote:
The inevitable conclusion is that you have still failed
to implement this fundamental technique in yourchess
program. Is that because you have no idea what I am
talking about, or perhaps your programmers have no
time for researching how to implement this method?

On improvement there was a bug introduced which was later removed. You
have played lots of game you know it doesn't make such silly moves.

Well, it seems that those who report their results
here are the ones who were lucky enough to have
exploited one of the *many* bugs in the program.
In my games, the program rarely makes such
blunders as the ones reported here.


Whenever the game is improved a new bug comes in and we have to remove
that Bug also.

I see. The introduction of new bugs in exchange
for some alleged improvement may not in fact be
an improvement, after all. However, if you were to
(finally) implement the check & capture extensions,
then we might see some real improvement, new
bugs notwithstanding!


Play a game:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

Now the Beginner Level plays quite strong moves. I am sure people will
start loosing to the higher levels and soon Normal and Master Level
will increase their Ratings to 1600 or so. Currently their rating is
arround 500/600.

Rather than continue to randomly announce these
"improvements", why not watch your own ratings to
see if the change truly is one or not? At this point,
any substantial improvement should be reflected by
a *rapid* increase in the program's own ratings. I
could demonstrate this by taking over for it and
playing all the games simultaneously myself, and
I guarantee that if there are weak players I will get
all your levels back up to 1000 quickly. :D

-- help bot