![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: chess, further, getclub, improved |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi guys after a long time I am able to give good news that GetClub
Chess has further improved. Play a game: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html Now it will see even those moves which are hidden and difficult to see. Beginner Level will play fast but not so good. Easy Level will give good challenge Normal Level very strong. Master will outplay many good players. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
"Sanny" wrote: Master will outplay many good players. Your work on the interface keeps getting worse and worse. Now the program keeps spawning a window (despite my pop-up blocker) which asks me to buy games. I can close it, but it pops back up shortly. It also opens another, uncloseable window. This is unacceptable, and make the game, as far as I'm concerned, unplayable. -Ron |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, Ron wrote:
In article .com, "Sanny" wrote: Master will outplay many good players. Your work on the interface keeps getting worse and worse. He especially needs to get rid of that hideous, idiotic cartoon character to the left of the board, who repeatedly sticks his tongue out. Trying a quick game this morning, I would say the program has regressed. It was lost after just 4 moves: 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.Qf3?! Ne5 4.Bxf7+?? Nxf7 5.d4? cxd4. Virtually as bad as its early days when it would play things like 1.e4 e6 2.d4 Bd6?! 3.Nf3 Nf6??. Now the program keeps spawning a window (despite my pop-up blocker) which asks me to buy games. I can close it, but it pops back up shortly. It also opens another, uncloseable window. This is unacceptable, and make the game, as far as I'm concerned, unplayable. -Ron |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, Ron wrote:
In article .com, "Sanny" wrote: Master will outplay many good players. Your work on the interface keeps getting worse and worse. Now the program keeps spawning a window (despite my pop-up blocker) which asks me to buy games. I can close it, but it pops back up shortly. It also opens another, uncloseable window. This is unacceptable, and make the game, as far as I'm concerned, unplayable. Who do you think you're kidding here? Everyone knows that the *real* reason you find the game to be unplayable is the program's utterly overwhelming strength! After years of countless "improvements", Sanny's program is likely in the USCF 4000-5000 rating range. ;D -- help butt |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 16, 3:46 pm, "Taylor Kingston"
wrote: Your work on the interface keeps getting worse and worse. He especially needs to get rid of that hideous, idiotic cartoon character to the left of the board, who repeatedly sticks his tongue out. Um, FYI: I modeled for that caricature; while it's true that I don't always stick my tongue out during play or open and close my hands compulsively, I thought it was a rather accurate approximation overall. The reason the pic appears where it does is that this is as close as Sanny's programmers were able to place the pic to my name and stats, while maintaining the virtually perfect feng shui of the Web page. Trying a quick game this morning, I would say the program has regressed. It was lost after just 4 moves: 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.Qf3?! Ne5 4.Bxf7+?? Nxf7 5.d4? cxd4. Virtually as bad as its early days when it would play things like 1.e4 e6 2.d4 Bd6?! 3.Nf3 Nf6??. I always wondered how you managed to get so many wins back then. ;D -- help bot |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 16, 3:33 pm, "help bot" wrote:
On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, Ron wrote: After years of countless "improvements", Sanny's program is likely in the USCF 4000-5000 rating range. Just divide by ten and you're close. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beginner Level will play fast but not so good. I started a game at beginner level, with white: 1. e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3. Bc4 and now by its own timer getclubbed took 40 seconds to come up with 3. ... Nf6. I am SO impressed. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Trying a quick game this morning, I would say the program has regressed. It was lost after just 4 moves: 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.Qf3?! Ne5 4.Bxf7+?? Nxf7 5.d4? cxd4. Virtually as bad as its early days when it would play things like 1.e4 e6 2.d4 Bd6?! 3.Nf3 Nf6??. Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html You played with Beginner Level, I suppose. Try Easy & Normal Levels and they will not come under tricks as easily as they used to earlier. For you Master Level will be the best to play with. Now they do not take as much time as they used to earlier but give very good moves. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 17, 2:33 am, Sanny wrote:
Trying a quick game this morning, I would say the program has regressed. It was lost after just 4 moves: 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.Qf3?! Ne5 4.Bxf7+?? Nxf7 5.d4? cxd4. Virtually as bad as its early days when it would play things like 1.e4 e6 2.d4 Bd6?! 3.Nf3 Nf6??. Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html You played with Beginner Level, I suppose. Try Easy & Normal Levels and they will not come under tricks as easily as they used to earlier. For you Master Level will be the best to play with. Now they do not take as much time as they used to earlier but give very good moves. Sanny, believe it or not, on a modern computer such blunders as this should not occur on *any* level, unless deliberately contrived to emulate the play of a total patzer. For instance, the move: 4.Bxf7+ immediately hangs a piece, and the followup: 5.d4 immediately hangs a pawn. Any chess program which properly uses the technique of check & capture extensions will "see" this sort of thing in the blink of an eye, so it matters not which level one may be playing. The inevitable conclusion is that you have still failed to implement this fundamental technique in your chess program. Is that because you have no idea what I am talking about, or perhaps your programmers have no time for researching how to implement this method? -- help bot |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The inevitable conclusion is that you have still failed
to implement this fundamental technique in yourchess program. Is that because you have no idea what I am talking about, or perhaps your programmers have no time for researching how to implement this method? On improvement there was a bug introduced which was later removed. You have played lots of game you know it doesn't make such silly moves. Whenever the game is improved a new bug comes in and we have to remove that Bug also. Play a game: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html Now the Beginner Level plays quite strong moves. I am sure people will start loosing to the higher levels and soon Normal and Master Level will increase their Ratings to 1600 or so. Currently their rating is arround 500/600. Bye Sanny Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Swedish Chess", by Mats Winther | Mats Winther | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | May 25th 06 11:09 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | February 19th 06 05:44 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 18th 05 05:36 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 3rd 05 05:30 AM |