On Apr 22, 8:39 am, samsloan wrote:
On Apr 18, 11:34 pm, Rob wrote:

How about my membership listing from USCF forums?

877 Send private message Robmtchl Nashville,
Tennessee 02 Jan 2005 0

It doesn't copy and paste very well. But There I am. Since 2005 I am
877 on the list.

Not true. I have just searched and can find no postings by "Robmtchl"
to the USCF Forums.

Also, back in 2005 USCF membership was not required for posting to the
forums.

You can prove me wrong by posting to the USCF Forums now.

Note that the two defenders you had no longer seem to be defending you
now that you have posted under two more fake names to the FIDE-chess
Yahoo Group.

Sam Sloan

Mr. Sloan,
I posted a direct copy from the USCF's website. If you will search the
forums member list you can find it. If you wish to continue this
farce, go right ahead. It's will become a source of embarrissment if
someone with your talent and ability cannot find my information. If
you search through your emails from about a year and a half ago I am
sure you will find my phone number and our correspondence

I cannot make you see that which you do not want to find.

..Mr. Sloan has received the proof. He still has not lifted the "ban".
In this instance Mr. Sloan has proven his word to be as unreliable as
his "facts".

While he says the USCF has lost thousands of dollars on his watch he
dodges any responsibility by saying he is just one man. Since he is
unable to work with any member of the board to any productive means,
he uses personal information about the executive director and
personally attacks him thus violating Hippa and EEOC regulations. When
he is warned not to do so and he ignores the advise and gets censured
by the USCF for shooting off his mouth, he bans the messenger from a
discussion group he moderates.( He says he doesn't know who that
person is,even though he has that persons email, phone number and has
communicated with that person privately in the past!)

Mr. Sloan fails to respond to questions as to his statements" it's
impossible to rape a woman" He is also silent as to why he has posted
images of nude young girls engaging in prurient behavior. On these
indefensible issues Mr. Sloan has remained silent. He has remained
silent concerning a drug arrest as well as an arrest for having junior
high school children present at an orgy he sponsored.

There is a great deal of dissatisfaction with the USCF. So much so
that someone positioning them self as a "reformer" got elected. Those
who voted for him either didn't know about his past or were of a
similar nature in dubious sexual enterprises.

I will be honest. I do not expect Mr. Sloan to have the courage to
allow me to post in a newsgroup he moderates. I am simply too honest.
Do not think I am overtly hostile to Mr. Sloan. I have defended his
work against attacks by Louis Blair when Mr. Sloans chess biographies
were summarily deleted from WIkipedia. I even offered him another site
to post them.

If the USCF cannot find a way to self police and silence and remove
quickly dangerous threats to their viability and legal liabilities as
Mr. Sloan; they may not long survive. Parents may soon begin to find
other venues for their children to engage in scholastic chess once
they discover someone who advocates sexula relations with girls not
yet of the age of majority is on the elected governing board of the
USCF.

In parting I would request someone please post this to the newsgroup I
have been banned from addressing.
Rob

On Apr 22, 7:39 am, samsloan wrote:
On Apr 18, 11:34 pm, Rob wrote:

How about my membership listing from USCF forums?

877 Send private message Robmtchl Nashville,
Tennessee 02 Jan 2005 0

It doesn't copy and paste very well. But There I am. Since 2005 I am
877 on the list.

Not true. I have just searched and can find no postings by "Robmtchl"
to the USCF Forums.

Also, back in 2005 USCF membership was not required for posting to the
forums.

You can prove me wrong by posting to the USCF Forums now.

Note that the two defenders you had no longer seem to be defending you
now that you have posted under two more fake names to the FIDE-chess
Yahoo Group.

Sam Sloan

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
posted by chessone in yahoo fide chess group:

Sam Sloan keeps up the blather that he has become confused over Rob
Mitchell's identity, that Rob Mitchell never sent him his telephone #,
and
there are so many Rob Mitchell's around that he, Sam Sloan, is
somehow
confused.

But what Rob Mitchell actually did is challenge Sam Sloan's actions -
not his
blather.
He challenged the reporting of Bill Hall's medical status;
Challenged it in law, and as ethical factor.

He also challenged the porn on Sam Sloan's site.

I would say that any politician who would ban someone for questioning
what
they actually do is someone living in fantasy-land. Chess politicos
need to
become quite literally, response-able - and packing people off to the
Gulags
is quite out of style!

At least Rob Mitchell knows what standards are - since he impartially
defended Sam Sloan just one month ago for the destructive action at
Wikipedia, even though quite clearly Mitchell and Sloan have different
views
on much else.

In terms of their relationship it is strange to think that Mitchell
appears
as the impartial administrator, and Sloan the fickle faddist.

Phil Innes

--------

to All Here

Rob Mitchell has just now finally provided me with a USCF ID number
which has says it his. The number is 12965920

It is to be recalled that I suspended him from my FIDE-chess Yahoo
group because Rob Mitchell refused to provide his USCF ID number and
said that he would not do so, thereby violating a rule of my group
that anonymous or fake name posters are not allowed.

By providing this number, Rob Mitchell is asking to be reinstated.

This number indicates that he is not a USCF member and has never
played in a USCF rated tournament.

..

He put me into his own group and made a member without my permission
and then banned me from this group I never asked to join.

## note from RobThis is a lie. I invited him to the group. I never
placed him in it without his permission. I snipped Sloans whineing
about how evil I am!

As a result of all of the above, I see no reason for allowing Rob
Mitchell back into my group and I note that the only two people who
supported his being reinstated have been quiet about that lately.

Sam Sloan



__._,_.___