![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 35836, payment, polgar |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 5, 4:13 pm, Rob wrote:
Sam Sloan I would like Mr. Sloan to provide a total accounting of the costs to the USCF in defending his frivilous lawsuits? How much money has Mr. Sloan cost the USCF when they honored his requests for various items? I dare say Mr. Sloan has depleted USCF funds at a much greater rate than any other single person and has contributed even less. The total legal bill from Michael Matsler to defend my lawsuit was $8,000. The amount the USCF lost by winning that laswuit was close to one million dollars, which is what the move to Crossville will cost the USCF. Sam Sloan |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob wrote:
Sam Sloan I would like Mr. Sloan to provide a total accounting of the costs to the USCF in defending his frivilous lawsuits? How much money has Mr. Sloan cost the USCF when they honored his requests for various items? I dare say Mr. Sloan has depleted USCF funds at a much greater rate than any other single person and has contributed even less. Holy crap. You continue your self-flagellation to keep yourself down and not taken seriously. For a serious organization, questions such as these would be inexpensive and well within their duty to answer. The information would be documented and in hand. And certainly wouldn't require someone to take a cross country trip to run through boxes. This is not a new or undocumented issue, yet certainly seems unfixed. A mature and serious organization would not have to put up with these questions, because they would not have been raised. The USCF has long passed the line of "trust me", and have yet to repair their reputation. The process is more of a problem with them, than the irritants they have spawned. Lets put it simply... Making money hides a lot of ills. Losing money exposes them all. Why don't they start by making money. Not a little, but a substantial amount. Then you can talk about not wasting time. And has Sloan filed a frivolous lawsuit against the USCF? I know that there have been a number, but I don't recall any by Sloan. I don't really understand your post, if not for blind sensationalism, or to draw so much noise to nothing, as to obscure what may be important. Or you honestly have no freakin' idea how to get what you want except by being petulant. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 5, 2:27 pm, samsloan wrote:
On May 5, 4:13 pm, Rob wrote: Sam Sloan I would like Mr. Sloan to provide a total accounting of the costs to the USCF in defending his frivilous lawsuits? How much money has Mr. Sloan cost the USCF when they honored his requests for various items? I dare say Mr. Sloan has depleted USCF funds at a much greater rate than any other single person and has contributed even less. The total legal bill from Michael Matsler to defend my lawsuit was $8,000. The amount the USCF lost by winning that laswuit was close to one million dollars, which is what the move to Crossville will cost the USCF. Sam Sloan And what was the cost for those employees of the USCF and executive board members from their work time? You simply are not divulging the total costs and you know it. Claiming that the move cost the USCf is simply another rancid fabrication. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 5, 2:48 pm, JohnnyT wrote:
Rob wrote: Sam Sloan I would like Mr. Sloan to provide a total accounting of the costs to the USCF in defending his frivilous lawsuits? How much money has Mr. Sloan cost the USCF when they honored his requests for various items? I dare say Mr. Sloan has depleted USCF funds at a much greater rate than any other single person and has contributed even less. Holy crap. You continue your self-flagellation to keep yourself down and not taken seriously. For a serious organization, questions such as these would be inexpensive and well within their duty to answer. The information would be documented and in hand. And certainly wouldn't require someone to take a cross country trip to run through boxes. This is not a new or undocumented issue, yet certainly seems unfixed. A mature and serious organization would not have to put up with these questions, because they would not have been raised. The USCF has long passed the line of "trust me", and have yet to repair their reputation. The process is more of a problem with them, than the irritants they have spawned. Lets put it simply... Making money hides a lot of ills. Losing money exposes them all. Why don't they start by making money. Not a little, but a substantial amount. Then you can talk about not wasting time. And has Sloan filed a frivolous lawsuit against the USCF? I know that there have been a number, but I don't recall any by Sloan. I don't really understand your post, if not for blind sensationalism, or to draw so much noise to nothing, as to obscure what may be important. Or you honestly have no freakin' idea how to get what you want except by being petulant. When you have done further research about Sloan and his lawsuits, we can discuss it.I tire of Mr. Sloans dishonesty in his arttacks on good people. I do not believe the USCF is lilly white either. I feel Sloans attacks are misguided and of ill use. I agree they should be trying to make money. One of the problems to doing that effectivly is an administrative structure that allows itself to be hamstrung by individuals as Sloan without a remediation possible. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Goichberg's List | samsloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 3 | March 19th 07 09:09 PM |
| Goichberg's List | samsloan | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 2 | March 19th 07 07:25 PM |
| Goichberg's List | samsloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 2 | March 19th 07 07:25 PM |
| The Payment of $13,358.36 to Polgar | samsloan | rec.games.chess.politics (Chess Politics) | 14 | February 22nd 07 09:28 PM |
| The Payment of $13,358.36 to Polgar | samsloan | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 11 | February 22nd 07 09:28 PM |