![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Entertaining article by Jeremy Spinrad about Elijah Williams at Chess Cafe.
I was interested in the following, about the Staunton v. Williams match: " ... the impartial Löwenthal would support him in saying that Williams did not play fairly, doing his best to: ".wear out his invalid host. Upon some occasions he did not appear until mid-day had passed, in order that the game might be protracted to midnight. At others he did not appear at all, but sent the most frivolous excuses." But Williams' story seems to be that the three games were in exchange for Staunton's desire to have the match played at Staunton's country home; showing up late for some games does not strike me as giving Williams more advantage than Staunton might get from not needing to travel." ---- Wouldn't this depend exactly how late Williams arrived? Staunton's "country home" seems a slight misnomer, since throughout the 1851 tournament he lived at 8 Sydney Place, Brompton - more of a town house. (It is where his wife had lived before their marriage in 1849 and is still standing today.) To reach the tournament rooms, Staunton would have needed to walk a few hundred yards to Piccadilly, then turn left into Bond Street, before cutting through Hanover Square to the Polytechnic Institution in Cavendish Square - in all about one and a half miles. If Williams lived to the south or west of Cavendish Square, his journey to Staunton's house would have been shorter than to the tournament rooms; but if he lived to the north or east, he would have had to travel a maximum of an extra one and a half miles. Therefore, it would seem he had little excuse for being more than ten or twenty minutes late. I should imagine that three games start were much more than adequate compensation for Staunton's advantage of home venue. In suggesting that they played there, perhaps Staunton was thinking more of the absence of distractions than avoiding the need to travel. At any rate, it would have given him the opportunity, if he so desired, to go to bed for a few hours while Williams was on move! Regards, John Townsend, Howard Staunton Research Project: http://www.johntownsend.demon.co.uk/...es\Page324.htm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Staunton wood 2de Pieces for chessmaster 10 | cmcanulty | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 1 | May 26th 06 01:39 AM |
| Obscure players of 1851 | Jeremy Spinrad | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 7 | March 16th 06 06:18 PM |
| A (possibly crackpot) theory on London 1851 | John Townsend | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | December 31st 05 11:38 AM |
| Looking for Staunton chess piece descriptions | Ben Thomas | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | October 18th 05 11:40 PM |
| staunton chess men | stewart | alt.chess (Alternative Chess Group) | 3 | July 10th 04 09:36 PM |