I have to admit I have a hard time understanding why serious people
keep responding to the endless onslaught of speculation, innuendo, and
character assassination coming from Mr. Sloan. Simply ignore him
unless he has one of those rare moments when he posts something of
merit.

Perhaps Sam Sloan, Brenan Nierman and Brian Lafferty will get
eventually bored if nobody responds to them. That's how you deal with
trolls. Trying to reason is a complete waste of time as evidenced by
countless posts on this forum.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:03:40 -0700, Jackass Lafferty
wrote:

I have to admit I have a hard time understanding why serious people
keep responding to the endless onslaught of speculation, innuendo, and
character assassination coming from Mr. Sloan.


You forgot off-topic posts. With very rare exceptions, all his posts
belong in rec.games.chess.politics, if they belong anywhere, not
cross-posted to "every* possible chess newsgroup. Sloan thinks what he
has to say is so important that it it's worth bypassing all the rules.

Simply ignore him
unless he has one of those rare moments when he posts something of
merit.


I must have missed those rare moments. I've never seen anything of
merit from hom.

--
Ken Blake
Please Reply to the Newsgroup