![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: alternative, birds ninjas, chess variants, flying bomber, game, game design, strategy, variant |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would like some opinions on this chess variant: Birds and Ninjas
http://chess.computerwebservices.net/birds.php It uses the flying bomber piece for the game Flying Bombers Grand Chess also found on that site: http://chess.computerwebservices.net/flying.php What do you guys think about that variant? Or with chess variants in general? On the gameplay of variants vs chess? And can someone also please explain what forum is appropriate for this sort of topic- mainly because this chess politics crap from the USCF is spilling over to other forums. I mean how the hell can the idiot posting chess politics not understand this: A general discussion of all thing related to chess, where it is NOT relevant to post in another forum. What the hell is the use of different topics for forums if you are going to post the same thing in all of them? This whole site is becoming JUNK because of this Sam Sloan politics crap! Last edited by ChessVariant Inventor : October 22nd 07 at 03:11 AM. Reason: forgot something |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
ChessVariant Inventor wrote:
And can someone also please explain what forum is appropriate for this sort of topic- mainly because this chess politics crap from the USCF is spilling over to other forums. This is the correct place within rec.games.chess.*. I mean how the hell can the idiot posting chess politics not understand this: Their goal is to look like dicks in front of as many people as possible, not to conduct a reasonable discussion about anything. As such, the points you raise, while perfectly correct, are irrelevant to them. You can get rid of most of the junk with killfiles. Dave. -- David Richerby Gigantic Sumerian Lotion (TM): it's www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ like a soothing hand lotion that's really old but it's huge! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 21, 10:08 pm, ChessVariant Inventor ChessVariant.Inventor.
wrote: I would like some opinions on this chess variant: Birds and Ninjas http://chess.computerwebservices.net/birds.php I don't have a board that big currently. Have you implemented in Zillions? Maybe I can download it to take a look. Tell you what, if it is in Zillions, then I will check it out. I will also ask you to check out my set of chess variants involving the use of a Champion (Knight-Rook) and Templar (Knight-Bishop) pieces on an 8x8 board. This family of games goes by the name of: IAGO Standard Fantasy Chess . You can get the ZRF file and also read the discussion he http://abstractgamers.org/forums/com...&page=1#Item_3 It uses the flying bomber piece for the game Flying Bombers Grand Chess also found on that site:http://chess.computerwebservices.net/flying.php What do you guys think about that variant? Or with chess variants in general? On the gameplay of variants vs chess? Myself, I am a BIG fan of chess variants and all abstracts (and shoot, all table games). I am a type who would rather never play the same game twice, than stick to a single game. I would be more akin to Fischer's Random Chess than standard chess, and the Birds and Ninja variant. Of course, this is me speaking. My experience with a local chess club is all they wanted to do is play speed chess. I found it a bit ironic they were complaining speed chess wasn't accepted when they were fairly intolerant of any other chess variant. And can someone also please explain what forum is appropriate for this sort of topic- mainly because this chess politics crap from the USCF is spilling over to other forums. The Sam Sloan at war bit is boring me to tears personally. As for where to discuss chess variants, you have multiple choices: 1. Boardgame Geek. You will get a bit there. Not the strongest but some. 2. The Yahoo abstract games forum. 3. rec.games.abstract usenet newsgroup. 4. The Chess variants website: http://www.chessvariants.org . This is likely your strongest bet if you want to discuss chess variants. 5. The abstractgamers.org website forum. This is the discussion forum for people interest in the International Abstract Games Organization (IAGO), which is currently in prelaunch at this point. IAGO will look to promote all abstracts and work to have champions in different classes of abstract strategy games (like a chess variant world champion), and specific games. It is meant to cover abstract strategy games that don't have an association cover them. You can go here for that: http://www.abstractgamers.org . Eventually it will have an IAGO- (something).com URL, once there is an actually website is up. If you haven't yet, please consider visiting the abstractgamers forum and getting involved with IAGO is some manner. The organization is meant to be a home for you, and looks to avoid a ton of political nonsense. I mean how the hell can the idiot posting chess politics not understand this: A general discussion of all thing related to chess, where it is NOT relevant to post in another forum. What the hell is the use of different topics for forums if you are going to post the same thing in all of them? I found it interest that I posted ideas of changing the chess clock and perhaps adding a doubling cube, as ways to address draw issues and make it more watchable on TV, in rec.games.chess.misc, and someone cross-posts it to the chess.politics newsgroup. I am believing there is a bit of envy over poker's success for some reason. This whole site is becoming JUNK because of this Sam Sloan politics crap! I agree here. I am seriously wondering what has to do to NOT tick off Sam Sloan. - Rich |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rich Hutnik wrote:
I will also ask you to check out my set of chess variants involving the use of a Champion (Knight-Rook) and Templar (Knight-Bishop) pieces on an 8x8 board. These pieces are better known as chancellor and archbishop, respec- tively. There are other names but it probably doesn't help to make even more. Dave. -- David Richerby Aluminium Cheese (TM): it's like a www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ brick of cheese that's really light! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You can however play all my games at the chess variants site -- For example Birds and Ninjas can be played: http://play.chessvariants.org/pbm/pl... s+and+Ninjas Can yours be also played there? In that case I don't mind playing.. Interesting you call the knight-rook - the champion. Omega chess uses a different piece called the Champion! I will check out the abstract gamers site.. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Swedish Chess", by Mats Winther | Mats Winther | rec.games.chess.computer (Computer Chess) | 0 | May 25th 06 11:09 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | February 19th 06 05:44 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 18th 05 05:36 AM |
| rec.games.chess.misc FAQ [2/4] | pribut@yahoo.com | rec.games.chess.misc (Chess General) | 0 | November 3rd 05 05:30 AM |