On Oct 29, 12:47 pm, wrote:

Seriously, short of scrapping the entire orginization and starting
over from scratch there seems little hope for chess in the US.


Here's a better idea: instead of scrapping the USCF -- which
would leave its minions free to pursue ideas of gaining control
of its replacement -- why not leave it in place to keep those
folks tied up (and busy suing one another)? That way, the new
organization can remain free of the political scum, which has
always plagued the USCF, for a while. In fact, a good strategy
would be to conceal the success of the new organization from
those people until after it was too late for them to get in. I say,
quarantine the scum /inside/ the USCF, and keep it alive so
they can continue what they do best: infighting, backstabbing,
etc.


-- help bot

On Oct 29, 4:17 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

Well, in a world where the FBI is allegedly investigating people who
find you tedious....

There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely, it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

Well, we shall see!

Since Brennan is a known stalker, if you complain, then this is in this
country, invigilated by the FBI, who also flash their jurisdisdiction before
every video or cd you rent.

Brennan is a hate-merchant. If you don't understand that, look at any
previous 100 posts he makes in any newsgroup. He suggests that this is some
hysteric reaction to himself, while it is actually what happens.

Brennan is such a character that the fellow who followed my reactions to his
posts, and who talked of sucking and ****ing my family members, was
suggested by Brennan to be my own writing.


All this stalking of Neil Brennan by IM Innes is tedious and
boring. Surely the nearly-an-IM can find something to do
besides stalk NB. How about writing about chess, for a
change?


-- bored bot

On Oct 29, 5:48 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

personalities in by last minute attempts] - though he noticed others I put
to him to such an extent he had to resort to a fabulous diversion on my
identity.

That is desperation tactics!

Wow. Finally, one rat has an epiphany regarding his pack's
situation: desperate.


A check now normal and necessary in this country. I wonder since the issue
is so pertinent in our society, that no-one can think of anything but 'poor
Sam' he has been impersonated by satirists!

Interesting; IM Innes seems to believe that whatever
the Fake Sloan and other fakes were doing, amounted
to nothing more than /satire/. I have seen comments
here that these postings numbered in the hundreds, if
not thousands, and that some contained really bad
stuff, far beyond the realm of satire; but I do not know,
for I have read few of them myself; as such, I have a
decided tendency to doubt SS's claims.



pfft!


Lacks a vowel, no?


-- help bot

The Historian wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely, it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

I was trying to underline the absurdity of Innes speaking on behalf
of the FBI.

I was just taking a free hit at Innes.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Salted Cat (TM): it's like a cat but
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's covered in salt!

"David Richerby" wrote in message
...
The Historian wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely, it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

I was trying to underline the absurdity of Innes speaking on behalf
of the FBI.

I was just taking a free hit at Innes.

Sure thing - after all why not chat with a known abusenik stalker instead of
talk about, say, the welfare of children in chess or public abuse of those
concerned with it. Some people find that 'boring', and I must suppose they
also find taking 'free hits' more exciting, or they just don't give a damn.

So when the subject of children's welfare is raised again, hopefully not by
any awful new circumstance, but electively so we can do whatever we can now
to limit abuse, we will know who prefered a 'free' opinion and did nothing
to contribute to the subject of adult or child abuse, when they could.

For entertainment value it is boring, especially if your tastes run to
shadenfreude. Those who don't like the game may prefer that, while those who
do care for it will continue to be as boring as adults!

"Boring for Britain", Phil Innes

Dave.

--
David Richerby Salted Cat (TM): it's like a cat
but
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's covered in salt!

On Oct 30, 6:10 am, David Richerby
wrote:
The Historian wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely, it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

I was trying to underline the absurdity of Innes speaking on behalf
of the FBI.

I was just taking a free hit at Innes.

Dave.

--
David Richerby Salted Cat (TM): it's like a cat butwww.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's covered in salt!

Sorry Dave, I was tired when I posted. I misread your post. My
apologies.

On Oct 30, 2:51 am, help bot wrote:
On Oct 29, 4:17 pm, "Chess One" wrote:



Well, in a world where the FBI is allegedly investigating people who
find you tedious....

There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely, it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

Well, we shall see!

Since Brennan is a known stalker, if you complain, then this is in this
country, invigilated by the FBI, who also flash their jurisdisdiction before
every video or cd you rent.

Brennan is a hate-merchant. If you don't understand that, look at any
previous 100 posts he makes in any newsgroup. He suggests that this is some
hysteric reaction to himself, while it is actually what happens.

Brennan is such a character that the fellow who followed my reactions to his
posts, and who talked of sucking and ****ing my family members, was
suggested by Brennan to be my own writing.

All this stalking of Neil Brennan by IM Innes is tedious and
boring. Surely the nearly-an-IM can find something to do
besides stalk NB. How about writing about chess, for a
change?

-- bored bot

Oh, but he's amusing at times. I loved the comment about my
"suggestion" that Innes is a hysteric, and Innes confirming "it' is
actually what happens." QED.

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:00:58 -0700, help bot
wrote:

On Oct 29, 5:48 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

pfft!

Lacks a vowel, no?

He was quoting Otis' friend, Bill the Cat. Personal growth thing.
He's trying to expand beyond Daffy Duck.

"The Historian" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 30, 2:51 am, help bot wrote:
On Oct 29, 4:17 pm, "Chess One" wrote:



Well, in a world where the FBI is allegedly investigating people who
find you tedious....

There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely,
it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

Well, we shall see!

Since Brennan is a known stalker, if you complain, then this is in this
country, invigilated by the FBI, who also flash their jurisdisdiction
before
every video or cd you rent.

Brennan is a hate-merchant. If you don't understand that, look at any
previous 100 posts he makes in any newsgroup. He suggests that this is
some
hysteric reaction to himself, while it is actually what happens.

Brennan is such a character that the fellow who followed my reactions
to his
posts, and who talked of sucking and ****ing my family members, was
suggested by Brennan to be my own writing.

All this stalking of Neil Brennan by IM Innes is tedious and
boring. Surely the nearly-an-IM can find something to do
besides stalk NB. How about writing about chess, for a
change?

-- bored bot

Oh, but he's amusing at times. I loved the comment about my
"suggestion" that Innes is a hysteric, and Innes confirming "it' is
actually what happens." QED.

Neil Brennan jokes about his own grossly indecent suggestion, about an
abuse-anon who only stalks those who contradict him.

Here he is trying to gloss the fact, while as usual ignoring all chess
content and rubbishing other people. Greg Kennedy also thinks its funny, so
reverses the relationship.

Neither of them have made any comment about an actual issue here = which has
to do with background checks for those who would have to do with our kids in
chess, which Sam Sloan is too busy to notice - right! And they are too busy
abusing to aver.

PI

On Oct 30, 12:29 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
"The Historian" wrote in message

ups.com...



On Oct 30, 2:51 am, help bot wrote:
On Oct 29, 4:17 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

Well, in a world where the FBI is allegedly investigating people who
find you tedious....

There are an awful lot of people who find Innes tedious. Surely,
it's
not beyond the bounds of possibility that the FBI is investigating at
least one of these people?

Well, we shall see!

Since Brennan is a known stalker, if you complain, then this is in this
country, invigilated by the FBI, who also flash their jurisdisdiction
before
every video or cd you rent.

Brennan is a hate-merchant. If you don't understand that, look at any
previous 100 posts he makes in any newsgroup. He suggests that this is
some
hysteric reaction to himself, while it is actually what happens.

Brennan is such a character that the fellow who followed my reactions
to his
posts, and who talked of sucking and ****ing my family members, was
suggested by Brennan to be my own writing.

All this stalking of Neil Brennan by IM Innes is tedious and
boring. Surely the nearly-an-IM can find something to do
besides stalk NB. How about writing about chess, for a
change?

-- bored bot

Oh, but he's amusing at times. I loved the comment about my
"suggestion" that Innes is a hysteric, and Innes confirming "it' is
actually what happens." QED.

Neil Brennan jokes about his own grossly indecent suggestion, about an
abuse-anon who only stalks those who contradict him.

Here he is trying to gloss the fact, while as usual ignoring all chess
content and rubbishing other people. Greg Kennedy also thinks its funny, so
reverses the relationship.

Neither of them have made any comment about an actual issue here = which has
to do with background checks for those who would have to do with our kids in
chess, which Sam Sloan is too busy to notice - right! And they are too busy
abusing to aver.

PI

Just to let you know we went through the background checks issue on my
FIDE-chess yahoo group at length and nobody agreed with Innes or his
sidekick Ron ("the Robber") Mitchell who want background checks for
everybody but themselves.

In sum, every public school does background checks on its employees
nowadays. However, the USCF should not get into the business of
background checks. We will not catch anybody. If it happens that
somebody slips through and gets arrested (like Robert Snyder for
example) we will be liable and get sued because we said he was OK.
Better to just let the schools take responsibility for that.

Innes seems to have directed this towards me. I have been finger
printed and I passed the background check that was required when I was
hired as a chess teacher in the New York City Public Schools.

On the other hand, I would really like to know what the background is
of Phil Innes, Rob ("the Robber") Mitchell and Paul Truong. I suspect
that they all have several names. Why in there no record in England
for such a great player as "Nearly an IM" Phil Innes?

Sam Sloan