With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how Mr. Sloan
can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you speak up
please?

- Rich

On Oct 31, 12:19 am, Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how Mr. Sloan
can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you speak up
please?

You have to understand, Mr. Sloan is very shy. In fact, if it
weren't for the Fake Sloan(s), we would never have heard a peep
out of him here. Asking him to expound on his "agenda" is a bit
like asking an ant what it is planning to do when it stops standing
around, jabbering. Mr. Sloan is a worker bee; he has no time to
jibber-jabber, for he is always working non-stop for the good of
chess, etc., etc.

When Mr. Sloan was on the board, he seemed obsessed with
financial matters, with the USCF's money (or what little of it was
left). This reminds me of our local chess organization, of pizza
parties and other wise "investments" they made with the
membership fees. Not that I'm envious, you know; they were,
after all, anchovie and mushroom (blech) pizzas... .


-- help bot

On Oct 31, 2:41 am, help bot wrote:
On Oct 31, 12:19 am, Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how Mr. Sloan
can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you speak up
please?

You have to understand, Mr. Sloan is very shy. In fact, if it
weren't for the Fake Sloan(s), we would never have heard a peep
out of him here. Asking him to expound on his "agenda" is a bit
like asking an ant what it is planning to do when it stops standing
around, jabbering. Mr. Sloan is a worker bee; he has no time to
jibber-jabber, for he is always working non-stop for the good of
chess, etc., etc.

When Mr. Sloan was on the board, he seemed obsessed with
financial matters, with the USCF's money (or what little of it was
left). This reminds me of our local chess organization, of pizza
parties and other wise "investments" they made with the
membership fees. Not that I'm envious, you know; they were,
after all, anchovie and mushroom (blech) pizzas... .

-- help bot

Are you say he is going to sign up Pizza Hut as a sponsor and serve
pizza at all the championship chess matches in the USA?

- Rich

Rich Hutnik wrote:
With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Swiss Nuclear Atom Bomb (TM): it's
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ like a weapon of mass destruction
that's made of atoms but it's made
in Switzerland!

On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:
Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

- Rich

Rich Hutnik wrote:
On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:
Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?
Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

- Rich

You were wrong.

--
Kenneth Sloan
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/

On Oct 31, 2:22 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:
On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:

Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

Rich, you may not be as familiar with Sloan as most rec.games.chess
regulars are. Virtually everyone here, with the lamentable exception
of Larry Parr, will tell you that Sam has no genuine interest in
improving chess. His only interest is in drawing attention to himself.
He simply uses chess and the USCF as a means to that end, along with
pornography, racism, and his various other interests.

On Oct 31, 7:14 pm, Taylor Kingston wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:22 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:





On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:

Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

Rich, you may not be as familiar with Sloan as most rec.games.chess
regulars are. Virtually everyone here, with the lamentable exception
of Larry Parr, will tell you that Sam has no genuine interest in
improving chess. His only interest is in drawing attention to himself.
He simply uses chess and the USCF as a means to that end, along with
pornography, racism, and his various other interests.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My money says Sam is an excellent EB member. If Paul Troung wants to
threaten
to kill me, then I am going to put Sam BACK ON THE BOARD. What other
defense
do I have?

I am a former officer of the company, and a court will look at my
judgement as much as any other officer.
The old board being put back is a common law remedy. Deal with it!

Marcus Roberts
former USCF Vice President

A TRUE FARCEUR

Virtually everyone here, with the lamentable exception
of Larry Parr, will tell you that Sam has no genuine
interest in improving chess. -- Taylor Kingston

NMnot Taylor Kingston claims that Sam Sloan has
no interest in improving chess. Nonsense. Sam's
record as a Board member in which he exposed enormous
cost overruns and the crooked behavior of USCF
Executive Board members was outstanding.

NMnot Kingston, who lied about being a 2300-plus
Elo master, was challenged to a chess match by Mr. Sloan.
He has never forgiven Mr. Sloan for showing him up. Ah
yes, one can remember the Kingston posts of the period
in which he offered every excuse imaginable for
poltroonery such as refusing to breathe the same air
in the same room with Sam Sloan.
..
Perhaps it is time to revisit precisely what our
NMnot wrote and examine HIS OWN shifting explanations
for the lie about his rating. Or NMnot can peddle his
wares elsewhere. His choice.

Oh, yes, our NMnot has also posted under other
names on this forum IN PRAISE OF HIMSELF -- and then
told us that he has these things called "standards."
A true farceur. That is also a useful area to revisit
if this poseur fails to subside.

The man has a rock. He must needs recrawl beneath it.

Yours, Larry Parr

---

Taylor Kingston wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:22 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:
On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:

Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

Rich, you may not be as familiar with Sloan as most rec.games.chess
regulars are. Virtually everyone here, with the lamentable exception
of Larry Parr, will tell you that Sam has no genuine interest in
improving chess. His only interest is in drawing attention to himself.
He simply uses chess and the USCF as a means to that end, along with
pornography, racism, and his various other interests.

On Oct 31, 7:25 pm, wrote:

My money says Sam is an excellent EB member.

Really -- it says that? Mine talks incessantly about
being "parted" from fools, and how it expects very soon
to be on the move once again.


If Paul Troung wants to threaten
to kill me, then I am going to put Sam BACK ON THE BOARD. What other
defense do I have?

Um, "checkmate" PT?


I am a former officer of the company, and a court will look at my
judgement as much as any other officer.
The old board being put back is a common law remedy. Deal with it!

You do realize that even if SS were to get back on the
USCF board, he would still have but one vote -- just like
before? The last time, we heard a lot about what was
going on that SS did not like, but he seemed powerless
to do more than merely irritate the real powers, like the
BGs. The way things seem to work there, you need to
"own" at least a couple of other board members, so as
to get your ideas voted in and so as to keep the ideas
of your enemies (there is always a war going on) nixed.

Maybe the idea is just to stir up trouble, for the sake
of our amusement?


-- help bot